Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:39:11.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Public Policy

The Protective State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2019

Christopher Ansell
Christopher Ansell
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Summary

The modern state protects citizens from many different harms, from industrial accidents to airline crashes. This Element illuminates a distinctive politics of protection that transcends policy sectors as diverse as criminal justice, consumer protection, and public health. Adopting a comparative and historical perspective, the Element identifies common drivers of protective state-building as well as cross-national differences in the politics of protection. The Element concludes by examining political theories of the protective state, which seek to defend and critique the obligations for and the limits of state protection.
Get access

Keywords

protection
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Public Policy
Online ISBN: 9781108667081
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 18 April 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, T. (2011). The chronicle of a disease foretold: Pandemic H1N1 and the construction of a global health security threat. Political Studies, 59(4), 797–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C., Hurka, S., & Knill, C. (2017). Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(4), 327–344.Google Scholar
Adler, R. S. (1995). Redesigning people versus redesigning products: The Consumer Product Safety Commission addresses misuse. Journal of Law & Politics, 11, 79–127.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Albæk, E., Green-Pedersen, C., & Nielsen, L. B. (2007). Making tobacco consumption a political issue in the United States and Denmark: The dynamics of issue expansion in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, E. A. (2011). Policy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in Hungary: An advocacy coalition approach. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandrova, P. (2015). Upsetting the agenda: The clout of external focusing events in the European Council. Journal of Public Policy, 35(3), 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M. D. (2005). Laying down the law? Interest group influence on state adoption of animal cruelty felony laws. Policy Studies Journal, 33(3), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, P., & Esbester, M. (2018). Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, A. (2013). Surviving the turbulent future. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoore, L. (2013). The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security beyond Probability. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Andreas, P., & Price, R. (2001). From war fighting to crime fighting: Transforming the American national security state. International Studies Review, 3(3), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C., & Balsiger, J. (2011). Circuits of regulation: Transatlantic perspectives on persistent organic pollutants and endocrine disrupting chemicals. In Vogel, D. & Swinnen, J. F., eds., Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: The Shifting Roles of the EU, the US and California. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 180–199.Google Scholar
Ansell, C., & Baur, P. (2018). Explaining trends in risk governance: How problem definitions underpin risk regimes. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 9(4), 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C., Maxwell, R., & Sicurelli, D. (2006). Protesting food: NGOs and political mobilization in Europe. In Ansell, C. K. & Vogel, D., eds., What’s the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. K., & Vogel, D. (Eds.). (2006). What’s the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aradau, C. (2010). Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue, 41(5), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aradau, C. (2004) Security and the democratic scene. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aradau, C., Lobo-Guerrero, L., & Van Munster, R. (2008). Security, technologies of risk, and the political: Guest editors’ introduction. Security Dialogue, 39(2–3), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, R. (2014). Organized labor and the origins of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. New Solutions, 24(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attanasio, David L. (2015). The State Obligation to Protect. PhD. Dissertation. UCLA.Google Scholar
Atwood, K., Colditz, G. A., & Kawachi, I. (1997). From public health science to prevention policy: Placing science in its social and political contexts. American Journal of Public Health, 87(10), 1603–1606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auriel, P. 2018. Introduction. In Auriel, P., Beaud, O., & Wellman, C., eds., The Rule of Crisis: Terrorism, Emergency Legislation and the Rule of Law (Vol. 64). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayre, P. (2001). Child protection and the media: Lessons from the last three decades. British Journal of Social Work, 31(6), 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (2008). The constitution in the national surveillance state. Minnesota Law Review, 93, 1–25.Google Scholar
Balzacq, T. (2008). The policy tools of securitization: Information exchange, EU foreign and interior policies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (2002). Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, T. D. (2002). Waiting for crisis: Regulatory inaction and ineptitude and the Guadalupe Dunes oil spill. Social Problems, 49(2), 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Beermann, J. M. (2015). NFIB v. Sebelius and the right to health care: Government’s obligation to provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 18(2), 277–303.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2005). Insecurity, citizenship, and globalization: The multiple faces of state protection. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The responsibility to protect – five years on. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(2), 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beniger, J. (2009). The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J. (1988). Different processes, one result: The convergence of data protection policy in Europe and the United States. Governance, 1(4), 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, M., & Geyer, M. H. (Eds.). (2002). Two Cultures of Rights: The Quest for Inclusion and Participation in Modern America and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, S. (Ed.). (1983). Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berns, N. S. (2017). Framing the Victim: Domestic Violence, Media, and Social Problems. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigo, D. (2006). Internal and external aspects of security. European Security, 15(4), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binns, C. W., Lee, M. K., & Lee, A. H. (2018). Problems and prospects: Public health regulation of dietary supplements. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A., & Lawrence, R. G. (2009). Media framing and policy change after Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(10), 1405–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, B. H. (2014). Focusing events and public opinion: Evidence from the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Political Behavior, 36(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogard, C. J. (2001). Claimsmakers and contexts in early constructions of homelessness: A comparison of New York City and Washington, DC. Symbolic Interaction, 24(4), 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boin, A. et al. (2014). Civil Security and the European Union: A Survey of European Civil Security Systems and the Role of the EU in Building Shared Crisis Management Capacities. UI Papers, #2. Stockholm: Swedish Institute of International Affairs, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, R. W., Sharma, D., & Leader, T. I. (2016). The age of anxiety? It depends where you look: Changes in STAI trait anxiety, 1970–2010. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(2), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boothe, K., & Harrison, K. (2009). The influence of institutions on issue definition: Children’s environmental health policy in the United States and Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(3), 287–307.Google Scholar
Böschen, S., Kastenhofer, K., Rust, I., Soentgen, J., & Wehling, P. (2010). Scientific nonknowledge and its political dynamics: The cases of agri-biotechnology and mobile phoning. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(6), 783–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. R. (2011). The Environmental Rights Revolution: A Global Study of Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2000). The new regulatory state and the transformation of criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasoveanu, I. V., Brasoveanu, L. O., & Mascu, S. (2014). Comparative analysis of the consumer protection, considering the globalisation and technological changes, within member states of the European Union. Amfiteatru Economic, 16(36), 517.Google Scholar
Brown, E. K., & Socia, K. M. (2016). Twenty-first century punitiveness: Social sources of punitive American views reconsidered. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 935–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. M., & Fee, E. (2014). Social movements in health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, W. (1995). States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubeck, P., Kreibich, H., Penning‐Rowsell, E. C., Botzen, W. J. W., De Moel, H., & Klijn, F. (2017). Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – A comparative analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 10(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2011). From “flood defence” to “flood risk management”: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(3), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, S., Elmeland, K., Thom, B., & Nicholls, J. (2017). Alcohol, Power and Public Health: A Comparative Study of Alcohol Policy. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caduff, C. (2015). The Pandemic Perhaps: Dramatic Events in a Public Culture of Danger. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L. (2014). Organized crime and national security. New Criminal Law Review: In International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 220–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, C. R. (2005). “Women, children and other vulnerable groups”: Gender, strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transnational issue. International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), 295–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D. P. (2014). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D., & Sin, G. (2007). Policy tragedy and the emergence of regulation: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. Studies in American Political Development, 21(2), 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cate, F. H. (1994). The EU data protection directive, information privacy, and the public interest. Iowa Law Review, 80, 431–443.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. (2013). International statebuilding and the ideology of resilience. Politics, 33(4), 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, N., & Mackay, F. (2013). Feminist politics and framing contests: Domestic violence policy in Scotland and Wales. Critical Social Policy, 33(4), 593–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnysh, V., Lloyd, P., & Simmons, B. A. (2015). Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenot, D. (2011). The vicious cycle: Recurrent interactions among the media, politicians, the public, and child welfare services organizations. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(2–3), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., & Lodge, M. (2018). Reputation management in societal security: A comparative study. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, J. (2006). Beyond a snapshot: Preventing human trafficking in the global economy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 13(1), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, L. (2006). Worst Cases: Terror and Catastrophe in the Popular Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cmiel, K. (2004). The recent history of human rights. The American Historical Review, 109(1), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaffee, J. (2013). Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics, 33(4), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaffee, J., & Fussey, P. (2015). Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience. Security Dialogue, 46(1), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, R. W., & Primo, D. M. (2003). The Plane Truth: Airline Crashes, the Media, and Transportation Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. (2003). A Consumers’ Republic. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., & Atkinson, M. M. (1996). Paradigm shifts and policy networks: Cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16(3), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, S. J. (2014). Neoliberalism and natural disaster: Insurance as political technology of catastrophe. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2015). Vital systems security: Reflexive biopolitics and the government of emergency. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(2), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, S., & Lakoff, A. (2008). The vulnerability of vital systems: How “critical infrastructure” became a security problem. In Dunn, M. & Kristensen, K., eds., Securing the Homeland: Critical Infrastructure, Risk and (In) security. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 40–62.Google Scholar
Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordner, A., Mulcahy, M., & Brown, P. (2013). Chemical regulation on fire: Rapid policy advances on flame retardants. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(13), 7067–7076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critcher, C. (2011). For a political economy of moral panics. Crime, Media, Culture, 7(3), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuéllar, M. F. (2009). “Securing” the nation: Law, politics, and organization at the Federal Security Agency, 1939–1953. University of Chicago Law Review, 76(2), 587–718.Google Scholar
Curley, T. M. (2015). Models of emergency statebuilding in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 13(3), 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daemmrich, A. A. (2004). Pharmacopolitics: Drug Regulation in the United States and Germany. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. (1998). Linking policy networks and environmental policies: Nitrate policy making in Denmark and Sweden 1970–1995. Public Administration, 76(2), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, J. J. (2010). Child maltreatment in the last 50 years: The use of statistics. In Smeyers, P. & Depaepe, M., eds., Educational Research – The Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grazia, V. (2009). Irresistible Empire: America’s Advance through Twentieth-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, S. (2017). The End of Heaven: Disaster and Suffering in a Scientific Age. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeritt, D., Rothstein, H., Beaussier, A. L., & Howard, M. (2015). Mobilizing risk: Explaining policy transfer in food and occupational safety regulation in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 47(2), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, M. (2014). Safe until proven unsafe: Solving the growing debate around dietary supplement regulation. Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, 15(4), 576–597.Google Scholar
Dingwall, R., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2017). Health and Safety in a Changing World. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Donzelot, J. (1977). The Policing of Families. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, E. M. (2009). Media coverage of agency-related child maltreatment fatalities: Does it result in state legislative change intended to prevent future fatalities? Journal of Policy Practice, 8(3), 224–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, L. R. (2013). A constitutional right to police protection and classical liberal theory: Complement, not conflict. Akron Journal of Constitutional Law and Policy, 4, 37–69.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. (1992). The Sanitarians: A History of American Public Health. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, E. (2007). Escherichia coli, corporate discipline and the failure of the sewer state. Space and Polity, 11(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. L. (2005). “Victims” and “survivors”: Emerging vocabularies of motive for “battered” women who stay. Sociological Inquiry, 75(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. (1972). Paternalism. The Monist, 56(1), 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. (2016). Saving children, controlling families: Punishment, redistribution, and child protection. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilperin, J., Dennis, B., & Mooney, C. (2018, Oct. 1). Government report reveals the Trump Administration Is fully aware of the devastating impacts of climate change. The Washington Post. Available from www.sciencealert.com/government-report-reveals-the-trump-administration-is-already-preparing-for-the-worst-when-it-comes-to-climate-change#Google Scholar
Elbe, S. (2012). Bodies as battlefields: Toward the medicalization of insecurity. International Political Sociology, 6(3), 320–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, R. A. (1996). Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Epp, C. R. (2010). Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, C. R. (1998). The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A. (1995). The harm principle - and how it grew. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 45(4), 369–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (2016). The politics of health mobilization in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies.” Social Science & Medicine, 165, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S. (2008). Patient groups and health movements. In Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wacjman, J., eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 499–539.Google Scholar
Esbester, M., & Almond, P. (2017). Do the public have a problem with health and safety? In Dingwall, R. & Frost, S., eds., Health and Safety in a Changing World. London: Routledge, pp. 16–35.Google Scholar
Escobar, M. P., & Demeritt, D. (2014). Flooding and the framing of risk in British broadsheets, 1985–2010. Public Understanding of Science, 23(4), 454–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esmark, A. (2018). Limits to liberal government: An alternative history of governmentality. Administration & Society, 50(2), 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. (2010). Constitutional inclusion of animal rights in Germany and Switzerland: How did animal protection become an issue of national importance? Society & Animals, 18(3), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, F. (2014). L’Etat Providence. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Ewald, F. (1999). The return of the crafty genius: An outline of a philosophy of precaution. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 6, 47–79.Google Scholar
Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fairchild, A. L., Rosner, D., Colgrove, J., Bayer, R., & Fried, L. P. (2010). The EXODUS of public health: What history can tell us about the future. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fangerau, H., Görgen, A., & Griemmert, M. (2015). Child welfare and child protection: Medicalization and scandalization as the new norms in dealing with violence against children. In Bagattini, A. & Macleod, C., eds., The Nature of Children’s Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feurer, R. (1988). The meaning of “sisterhood”: The British women’s movement and protective labor legislation, 1870–1900. Victorian Studies, 31(2), 233–260.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. K., Rutledge, P. E., Dixon, G. C., & Peralta, J. S. (2016). When the smoke clears: Focusing events, issue definition, strategic framing, and the politics of gun control. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1144–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flickinger, R. (1983). The comparative politics of agenda setting: The emergence of consumer protection as a public policy issue in Britain and the United States. Review of Policy Research, 2(3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
France, A., & Utting, D. (2005). The paradigm of “risk and protection‐focused prevention” and its impact on services for children and families. Children & Society, 19(2), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., & Marsh, R. (2002). The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 22(4), 701–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, B. H. (2011). Managing fear: The politics of homeland security. Political Science Quarterly, 126(1), 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, D. A. (2013). Public health regulation and the limits of paternalism. Connecticut. Law Review, 46(5), 1687–1770.Google Scholar
Friedman, D. A. (2007). Reinventing consumer protection. DePaul Law Review, 57, 45–91.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (1994). Total Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M., & Thompson, J. (2003). Total disaster and total justice: Responses to man-made tragedy. DePaul Law Review, 53, 251–287.Google Scholar
Friesendorf, C. (2007). Pathologies of security governance: Efforts against human trafficking in Europe. Security Dialogue, 38(3), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedi, F. (2009). Precautionary culture and the rise of possibilistic risk assessment. Erasmus Law Review, 2(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedi, F. (2005). Politics of Fear. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Gainsborough, J. F. (2009). Scandals, lawsuits, and politics: Child welfare policy in the US States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 9(3), 325–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2003). The rise of risk. In Erickson, R. V. & Doyle, A., eds., Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 48–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2012). A comparative study of child welfare systems: Abstract orientations and concrete results. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2002). Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassner, B. (1999). The Culture of Fear. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Glickman, L. B. (2001). The strike in the temple of consumption: Consumer activism and twentieth-century American political culture. The Journal of American History, 88(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, W. T. Jr. (1986). Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity, 18(4), 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L. O., & Gostin, K. G. (2009). A broader liberty: JS Mill, paternalism and the public’s health. Public Health, 123(3), 214–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gourevitch, A. (2010). Environmentalism – long live the politics of fear. Public Culture, 22(3), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, G. C. (2009). The responsibilization strategy of health and safety: Neo-liberalism and the reconfiguration of individual responsibility for risk. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. (1997). Risk and Misfortune: A Social Construction of Accidents. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gross, M. L., Canetti, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2017). Cyberterrorism: Its effects on psychological well-being, public confidence and political attitudes. Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
Grüning, T., Strünck, C., & Gilmore, A. B. (2008). Puffing away? Explaining the politics of tobacco control in Germany. German Politics, 17(2), 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, M. F., & Capron, L. (2016). State capacity, minority shareholder protections, and stock market development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1), 125–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guldbrandsson, K., & Fossum, B. (2009). An exploration of the theoretical concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena. Health Promotion International, 24(4), 434–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagmann, J., & Cavelty, M. D. (2012). National risk registers: Security scientism and the propagation of permanent insecurity. Security Dialogue, 43(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmüller, J., & Lemnitzer, J. M. (2003). Why do Europeans fly safer? The politics of airport security in Europe and the US. Terrorism and Political Violence, 15(4), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, S., & Lea, J. (2011). Reconstructing Leviathan: Emerging contours of the security state. Theoretical Criminology, 15(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, H. A., Morales-Suárez-Varela, M. M., & Martin-Moreno, J. M. (2010). Chronic disease prevention and the new public health. Public Health Reviews, 32(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammit, J., Rogers, M., Sand, P., & Wiener, J. B. (2013). The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrieder, T., & Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2014). WHO decides on the exception? Securitization and emergency governance in global health. Security Dialogue, 45(4), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, B. E. (1999). The collapse of the harm principle. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 90(1), 109–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification.” Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. A. (2005). Good Cops: The Case for Preventive Policing. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. (1995). Is cooperation the answer? Canadian environmental enforcement in comparative context. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(2), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, J., Strid, S., Husu, L., & Verloo, M. (2016). Interrogating violence against women and state violence policy: Gendered intersectionalities and the quality of policy in The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Current Sociology, 64(4), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebenton, B., & Seddon, T. (2009). From dangerousness to precaution: Managing sexual and violent offenders in an insecure and uncertain age. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In Stillman, R., ed., Public Administration Concepts and Cases. New York: Barnes and Noble, pp. 46–57.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2012). Two or three waves of welfare state transformation? In Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J., eds., Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, pp. 33–60.Google Scholar
Heyer, K. C. (2002). The ADA on the road: Disability frights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry, 27(4), 723–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyman, S. J. (1991). First duty of government: Protection, liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment. Duke Law Journal, 41, 507–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hier, S. P., Lett, D., Walby, K., & Smith, A. (2011). Beyond folk devil resistance: Linking moral panic and moral regulation. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, M. (2009). Prosperity for All: Consumer Activism in an Era of Globalization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hilton, M. (2007). Social activism in an age of consumption: The organized consumer movement. Social History, 32(2), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M. (2002). Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: Evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 35(2), 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1998). Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: Operationalizing the postpositivist analysis of the politics of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 26(3), 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, P. M. (2008). Risk decisions in German constitutional and administrative law. In Woodman, G. & Klippel, D., eds., Risk and the Law. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar
Huffman, M. K. (2016). Moral panic and the politics of fear: The dubious logic underlying sex offender registration statutes and proposals for restoring measures of judicial discretion to sex offender management. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, 4(2), 241–303.Google Scholar
Hurka, S., & Nebel, K. (2013). Framing and policy change after shooting rampages: A comparative analysis of discourse networks. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, G., Leibenath, M., & Mattissek, A. (2014). Governing through resilience? Exploring flood protection in Dresden, Germany. Social Sciences, 3(2), 272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huysmans, J. (2004). Minding exceptions: The politics of insecurity and liberal democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (2007). The Rights Revolution. Toronto: House of Anansi.Google Scholar
Iriye, A., Goedde, P., & Hitchcock, W. I. (Eds.). (2012). The Human Rights Revolution: An International History (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, R., & Camasso, M. J. (2011). The crucial role played by social outrage in efforts to reform child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(6), 894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, M. (2009). Feeding children and protecting women: The emergence of breastfeeding as an international concern. Women’s Studies International Forum, 32(3), 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janus, E. S. (2006). Failure to Protect: America’s Sexual Predator Laws and the Rise of the Preventive State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2011). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59(1), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. (1994). “The ice age” the social construction of a drug panic. Justice Quarterly, 11(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, B. (2007). Public health and civic republicanism: Toward an alternative framework for public health ethics. In Dawson, A. & Verweij, M., eds., Ethics, Prevention and Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C. (2011). Focusing events, policy dictators and the dynamics of reform. Policy Studies, 32(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (1989). Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, Y., & Haider‐Markel, D. P. (2001). Tracing issue definition and policy change: An analysis of disability issue images and policy response. Policy Studies Journal, 29(2), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, J. (2003). Framing issues and seizing opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and women’s rights. International Studies Quarterly, 47(2), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L., Tunstall, S.M., & Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (2005). Floods as catalysts for policy change: Historical lessons from England and Wales. Water Resources Development, 21(4), 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. F. (2007). Discursive democracy in the transgenerational context and a precautionary turn in public reasoning. Contemporary Political Theory, 6(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joly, P. B. (2007). Scientific expertise in public arenas: Lessons from the French experience. Journal of Risk Research, 10(7), 905–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. M., & Bayer, R. (2007). Paternalism & its discontents: Motorcycle helmet laws, libertarian values, and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 97(2), 208–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience, 1(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. (2009). Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. (2000). Introduction: Comparing national styles of regulation in Japan and the United States. Law & Policy, 22(3–4), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamradt-Scott, A. (2012). Changing perceptions: Of pandemic influenza and public health responses. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 90–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasperson, R. E., & Kasperson, J. X. (1996). The social amplification and attenuation of risk. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, L. (2017). Tracing policy influence of diffuse interests: The post-crisis consumer finance protection politics in the US. Journal of Civil Society, 13(2), 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, K. R. (1980). The new regulation of health and safety. Political Science Quarterly, 95(3), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, A. C. (2009). Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, A. C., & Packel, L. (2014). Going for the cure: Patient interest groups and health advocacy in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(2), 331–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelman, S. (1981). Regulating America. Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Kerr, O. S. (2009). The national surveillance state: A response to Balkin. Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, 93, 2179–2184.Google Scholar
Kersh, R., & Morone, J. A. (2005). Obesity, courts, and the new politics of public health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30(5), 839–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kersh, R., & Morone, J. A. (2002). How the personal becomes political: Prohibitions, public health, and obesity. Studies in American Political Development, 16(2), 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kete, K. (2002). Animals and ideology: The politics of animal protection in Europe. In Rothfels, N., ed., Representing Animals. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Kickbusch, I. (2003). The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 383–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2018). Distributed responsibility in risk governance. In Wilderer, P. A., Renn, O., Grambow, M., Molls, M., & Mainzer, K., eds., Sustainable Risk Management. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk‐based, precaution‐based, and discourse‐based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1071–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, S. G. (2012). The Disaster Experts: Mastering Risk in Modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, K. (2013). The limits and variety of risk‐based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 236–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzer, P., & Cooper, A. (2011). Hold the croissant! The European Union declares war on obesity. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kysar, D. A. (2006). It might have been: Risk, precaution and opportunity costs. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 22, 1–57.Google Scholar
Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (Eds.). (2019). Societal Security and Crisis. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., & Colebatch, H. (2014). Problems, policy and politics: Making sense of Australia’s “ice epidemic.” Policy Studies, 35(2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, M. K. (1995). The new politics of environmental policy. In Landy, M. K. & Levin, M. A., eds., The New Politics of Public Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, M. K., & Levin, M. A. (Eds.). (1995). The New Politics of Public Policy. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lango, P., Rykkja, L. H.,& Lægreid, P. (2011). Organizing for Internal Security and Safety in Norway, Risk Management Trends, Giancarlo Nota, IntechOpen, DOI:10.5772/18277. Available from www.intechopen.com/books/risk-management-trends/organizing-for-internal-security-and-safety-in-norwayCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. W. (2009). The contemporary culture of blame and the fetishization of the modernist mentality. Current Sociology, 57(5), 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(3), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. T. (1998). The Ford Pinto case and the development of auto safety regulations, 1893–1978. Business and Economic History, 27(2), 390–401.Google Scholar
Leggett, W. (2014). The politics of behaviour change: Nudge, neoliberalism and the state. Policy & Politics, 42(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. (2012). Strange bedfellows: Smartersafer.org and the Biggert-Waters Act of 2012. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 23, 351–361.Google Scholar
Leisering, L., & Mabbett, D. (2011). Introduction: Towards a new regulatory state in old-age security? Exploring the issues. In Leisering, L., ed., The New Regulatory State. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leka, S., Jain, A., Zwetsloot, G., Andreou, N., & Hollis, D. (2017). The changing landscape of occupational health and safety policy in the UK. In Dingwall, R. & Frost, S., eds., Health and Safety in a Changing World. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lemke, T. (2001). “The birth of bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentzos, F., & Rose, N. (2009). Governing insecurity: Contingency planning, protection, resilience. Economy and Society, 38(2), 230–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenstein, H. (2012). Fear of Food. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linders, A., & Bogard, C. (2014). Teenage pregnancy as a social problem: A comparison of Sweden and the United States. In Cherry, A. L. & Dillon, M. L., eds., International Handbook of Adolescent Pregnancy. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, J. (2017). Threat or opportunity? The politicization of focusing events in the parliamentary arena. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(2), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litfin, K. (1994). Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. (2011). Risk, regulation and crisis: Comparing national responses in food safety regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 31(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., & Hood, C. (2002). Pavlovian policy responses to media feeding frenzies? Dangerous dogs regulation in comparative perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2011). Governance as contested logics of control: Europeanized meat inspection regimes in Denmark and Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(1), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofstedt, R. E. (2011). Risk versus hazard – How to regulate in the 21st century. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubitow, A. (2013). Collaborative frame construction in social movement campaigns: Bisphenol-A (BPA) and scientist–activist mobilization. Social Movement Studies, 12(4), 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundström, T. (2001). Child protection, voluntary organizations, and the public sector in Sweden. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenbach, J. P., & McKee, M. (2013). A comparative analysis of health policy performance in 43 European countries. The European Journal of Public Health, 23(2), 195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahoney, C. (2007). Networking vs. allying: The decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamudu, H. M., & Studlar, D. T. (2009). Multilevel governance and shared sovereignty: European Union, member states, and the FCTC. Governance, 22(1), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansell, J., Ota, R., Erasmus, R., & Marks, K. (2011). Reframing child protection: A response to a constant crisis of confidence in child protection. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2076–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, I. (2003). The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. B. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class (Vol. 2). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Mascini, P., Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2013). Neoliberalism and work-related risks: Individual or collective responsibilization? Journal of Risk Research, 16(10), 1209–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. N. (1991). Gone yesterday, here today: Consumer issues in the agenda‐setting process. Journal of Social Issues, 47(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBeth, M. K., Clemons, R. S., Husmann, M. A., Kusko, E., & Gaarden, A. (2013). The social construction of a crisis: Policy narratives and contemporary US obesity policy. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 4(3), 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, A. F. (1995). The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire of 1911: Social change, industrial accidents, and the evolution of common-sense causality. Law & Social Inquiry, 20(2), 621–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, R. S. (1995). Separation of powers and the strategy of rights: The expansion of special education. In Landy, M. K. & Levin, M. A., eds., The New Politics of Public Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1865). On Liberty. London: Longman, Greens and Co.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkkonen, E. H. (1992). History of urban police. Crime and Justice, 15, 547–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montpetit, E., & Rouillard, C. (2008). Culture and the democratization of risk management: The widening biotechnology gap between Canada and France. Administration & Society, 39(8), 907–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M., Yeatman, H., & Davey, R. (2015). Which nanny – the state or industry? Wowsers, teetotallers and the fun police in public health advocacy. Public Health, 129(8), 1030–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, D. A. (2004). When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk Manager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, J. E. (2008). A short history of child protection in America. Family Law Quarterly, 42(3), 449–463.Google Scholar
Nash, L. (2017). From safety to risk: The cold war contexts of American environmental policy. Journal of Policy History, 29(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, R. F. (1989). The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nathanson, C. A. (2007a). Disease Prevention as Social Change: The State, Society, and Public Health in the United States, France, Great Britain, and Canada. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Nathanson, C. A. (2007b). The contingent power of experts: Public health policy in the United States, Britain, and France. Journal of Policy History, 19(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nestle, M. (2013). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nestle, M. (2003). Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. E. J. (2011). Republicanism as a paradigm for public health – Some comments. Public Health Ethics, 4(1), 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, M. (2016). Public Health and Municipal Policy Making: Britain and Sweden, 1900–1940. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. L. Jr. (1998). The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century’s End. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Novkov, J. (2001). Constituting Workers, Protecting Women: Gender, Law and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, A., & Neeley, G. (1996). Toward an explanation for public interest group formation and proliferation. Policy Studies Journal, 24(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, K. (2017). An assessment of aggregate focusing events, disaster experience, and policy change. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(3), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. E. (2005). Fat Politics: The Real Story behind America’s Obesity Epidemic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, T. R. (2006). The politics of public health policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 195–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, P. (2010). Resilient subjects: Uncertainty, warfare and liberalism. Economy and Society, 39(4), 488–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, P. (2004). Risk, Uncertainty and Government. Milton Park, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
O’Neil, P. D., & Krane, D. (2012). Policy and organizational change in the Federal Aviation Administration: The ontogenesis of a high‐reliability organization. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, S. K. (2005). State animal protection laws – The next generation. Animal Law, 11, 131–166.Google Scholar
Parton, N. (2010). “From dangerousness to risk”: The growing importance of screening and surveillance systems for safeguarding and promoting the well-being of children in England. Health, Risk & Society, 12(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, N. (2008). The “Change for Children” programme in England: Towards the “preventive‐surveillance state.” Journal of Law and Society, 35(1), 166–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, N. (1979). The natural history of child abuse: A study in social problem definition. British Journal of Social Work, 9(4), 431–451.Google Scholar
Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E. (2013). The struggle to remake politics: Liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary American state. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1071–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, N. (1996). Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 678–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedriana, N. (2006). From protective to equal treatment: Legal framing processes and transformation of the women’s movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1718–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, R. (2015). The price of prevention: The preventative turn in crime policy and its consequences for the role of the state. Punishment & Society, 17(2), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, R. (2013). The Preventive Gaze: How Prevention Transforms Our Understanding of the State. PhD Thesis. Tilburg University, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penhale, B. (2007). Elder abuse in Europe: An overview of recent developments. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 18(1), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2015). Freedom and the state: Nanny or nightwatchman? Public Health, 129(8), 1055–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettit, P. (1987). Towards a social democratic theory of the state. Political Studies, 35(4), 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendas, D. O. (2012). Toward a new politics? On the recent historiography of human rights. Contemporary European History, 21(1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrunik, M., & Deutschmann, L. (2008). The exclusion–inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(5), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfohl, S. J. (1977). The “discovery” of child abuse. Social Problems, 24(3), 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, C. (1991). The Fail-Safe Society: Community Defiance and the End of American Technological Optimism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pope, T. M. (2003). Counting the dragon’s teeth and claws: The definition of hard paternalism. Georgia State University Law Review, 20, 659–722.Google Scholar
Porter, D. (1999). Health, Civilization, and the State: A History of Public Health from Ancient to Modern Times. Abingdon: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pralle, S. (2006). The “mouse that roared”: Agenda setting in Canadian pesticides politics. Policy Studies Journal, 34(2), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). “The Beast of Blenheim,” risk and the rise of the security sanction. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 528–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princen, S. (2007). Advocacy coalitions and the internationalization of public health policies. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pupavac, V. (2001). Therapeutic governance: Psycho‐social intervention and trauma risk management. Disasters, 25(4), 358–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, J. A. (2008). The child welfare system and state intervention in families: From historical patterns to future questions. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 888–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2006). Beyond the harm principle. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34(3), 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. S. (2013). Disasters and the American State: How Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Public Prepare for the Unexpected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocco, P. (2015). Mapping the policy state. Public Administration, 93(1), 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, P. (2012). Is securitization a “negative” concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, D., & Markowitz, G. (2016). Building the world that kills us: The politics of lead, science, and polluted homes, 1970 to 2000. Journal of Urban History, 42(2), 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, H., Borraz, O., & Huber, M. (2013). Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk‐based governance across Europe. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, H., Huber, M., & Gaskell, G. (2006). A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sack, E. J. (2004). Battered women and the state: The struggle for the future of domestic violence policy. Wisconsin Law Review, 6, 1657–1740.Google Scholar
Saetta, S. (2016). Medicalization of Sex Offenders: An Ethnological Study of a Specialized Prison and Treatment Facility in France. TEPSIS paper n°15 Réseau Monde Carcéral.Google Scholar
Saguy, A. C. (2000). Employment discrimination or sexual violence? Defining sexual harassment in American and French law. Law and Society Review, 34(4), 1091–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, M. B. (2008). Imagining numbers: Risk, quantification, and aviation security. Security Dialogue, 39(2–3), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang-Hun, Choe (2016, Dec. 23). Korean court begins impeachment process. New York Times. Available from www.nytimes.com/2016/12/22/world/asia/south-korea-president-park-impeachment.html.Google Scholar
Scheberle, D. (1994). Radon and asbestos: A study of agenda setting and causal stories. Policy Studies Journal, 22(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Theory of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, V. E., & Silverman, C. (2005). Common-sense construction of consumer protection acts. University of Kansas Law Review, 54, 1–72.Google Scholar
Sell, T. K., Watson, C., Meyer, D., Kronk, M., Ravi, S., Pechta, L. E., Lubell, K., & Rose, D. A. (2018). Frequency of risk‐related news media messages in 2016 coverage of Zika virus. Risk Analysis, 38(12), 2514–2524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schou Tjalve, V. (2011). Designing (de)security: European exceptionalism, Atlantic republicanism and the “public sphere,” Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. N. (2005). Shifting the burden of proof: The precautionary principle and its potential for the “democratization” of risk. Law Commission of Canada, 50–85.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. A. (2014). Dying at work: Political discourse and occupational safety and health. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 831–848.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S., & Glicksman, R. (2003). Risk Regulation at Risk: Restoring a Pragmatic Approach. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheingate, A. (2012). Still a jungle. Democracy, 25, 48–59.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (2015). Whiplash and backlash – Reflections on a human rights approach to environmental protection. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 13, 11–30.Google Scholar
Shepard, B. (2007). Sex panic and the welfare state. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. (1998). Managing the monstrous: Sex offenders and the new penology. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1–2), 452–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. (2005). Reversal of fortune: The resurgence of individual risk assessment in criminal justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, S. (2009). Taking stock. In Jacobs, L. & King, D., eds., The Unsustainable American State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrentny, J. D. (2002). The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1986). The psychometric study of risk perception. In Covello, V. T., Menkes, J., & Mumpower, J., eds., Risk Evaluation and Management. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, S. D., & Barach, P. (2002). Patient safety and health policy: A history and review. Hematology and Oncology Clinics of North America, 16(6), 1463–1482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. J. (1991). From policy community to issue network: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food. Public Administration, 69(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, M. K. (2008). The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, M.W., & Bowen, W.M. (2016). Are you scared yet? On the ethic of sustainability and the politics of fear in public administration. Public Integrity, 19(4), 300–315.Google Scholar
Stallings, R. A. (1990). Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Social Problems, 37(1), 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starck, C. (2000). State duties of protection and fundamental rights. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 3(1), 1–51.Google Scholar
Stephenson, N., Davis, M., Flowers, P., MacGregor, C., & Waller, E. (2014). Mobilising “vulnerability” in the public health response to pandemic influenza. Social Science & Medicine, 102, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolz, B. (2005). Educating policymakers and setting the criminal justice policymaking agenda: Interest groups and the “Victims of Trafficking and Violence Act of 2000.” Criminal Justice, 5(4), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, H. (2016). The meaning of “protection” within the refugee definition. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(3), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strünck, C. (2015). Consumer policy. In Wright, J. D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 4). Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 733–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studlar, D. T. (2014). Cancer prevention through stealth: Science, policy advocacy, and multilevel governance in the establishment of a “National Tobacco Control Regime” in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(3), 503–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(4), 583–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2002a). The paralyzing principle. Regulation, 25, 32–37.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2002b). Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1159–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, P. L. (2015). Chronic victims, risky women: Domestic violence advocacy and the medicalization of abuse. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinnen, J. (2015). Changing coalitions in value chains and the political economy of agricultural and food policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 31(1), 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switzer, J. V., & Vaughn, J. (1997). Green Backlash: The History and Politics of the Environmental Opposition in the US. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Tarlock, A. D. (2012). United States flood control policy: The incomplete transition from the illusion of total protection to risk management. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 23, 151–184.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2006). Social and public policy: Reflexive individualization and regulatory governance. In Taylor-Gooby, P. & Zinn, J. O., eds., Risk in Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.). (2004). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, P. (1985). Government actions in times of crisis: Lessons from the history of drug regulation. Journal of Social History, 18(3), 433–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C. I. (2014). In Food We Trust: The Politics of Purity in American Food Regulation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, K. (2015). Resilience and the neoliberal project: Discourses, critiques, practices – and Katrina. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(10), 1327–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In Besteman, C., ed., Violence: A Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
Trein, P. (2018). Healthy or Sick? Coevolution of Health Care and Public Health in a Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trein, P. (2017). Coevolution of policy sectors: A comparative analysis of healthcare and public health. Public Administration, 95(3), 744–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentmann, F. (2004). Beyond consumerism: New historical perspectives on consumption. Journal of Contemporary History, 39(3), 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoukala, A. (2006). Democracy in the light of security: British and French political discourses on domestic counter‐terrorism policies. Political Studies, 54(3), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbull, G. (2012). Strength in Numbers: The Political Power of Weak Interests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbull, G. (2006). Consumer Capitalism: Politics, Product Markets, and Firm Strategy in France and Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tulchinsky, T. H., & Varavikova, E. A. (2014). The New Public Health. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tunstall, A. M., Weible, C. M., Tomsich, E. A., & Gover, A. R. (2016). Understanding policy reform in Colorado’s domestic violence offender treatment standards. Social Policy & Administration, 50(5), 580–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urofsky, M. I. (1985). State courts and protective legislation during the Progressive Era: A reevaluation. The Journal of American History, 72(1), 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardi, I. (2014). Quantifying accidents: Cars, statistics, and unintended consequences in the construction of social problems over time. Qualitative Sociology, 37(3), 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasterman, P., Yzermans, C. J., & Dirkzwager, A. J. (2005). The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, D. (2012). The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (2009). Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (2003). The hare and the tortoise revisited: The new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. K. (1998). Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity. Sociological Forum 25 (2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In Liphshutz, R., ed., On Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2006). Safety and security. Nebraska Law Review, 85, 454–507.Google Scholar
Walker, B. A. (2010). Deciphering risk: Sex offender statutes and moral panic in a risk society. University of Baltimore Law Review, 40, 183–214.Google Scholar
Wälti, S. (2004). How multilevel structures affect environmental policy in industrialized countries. European Journal of Political Research, 43(4), 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. (2005). Imagining the administrative state: Legal pragmatism, securities regulation, and New Deal liberalism. Journal of Policy History, 17(3), 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardman, J. K., & Löfstedt, R. (2018). Anticipating or accommodating to public concern? Risk amplification and the politics of precaution reexamined. Risk Analysis, 38(9), 1802–1819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weingart, P. (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy 26(3), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society, 35(3), 447–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. L., & Htun, M. (2013). Feminist mobilisation and progressive policy change: Why governments take action to combat violence against women. Gender & Development, 21(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Braga, A. A., & Sullivan, C. J. (2014). Serious youth violence and innovative prevention: On the emerging link between public health and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 31(3), 500–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. (2007). Consumerism versus producerism: A study in comparative law. Yale Law Journal, 117, 340–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J. B., & Rogers, M. D. (2002). Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. Journal of Risk Research, 5(4), 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikander, U., Kessler-Harris, A., & Lewis, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). Protecting Women: Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, 1880–1920. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wiktorowicz, M. E. (2003). Emergent patterns in the regulation of pharmaceuticals: Institutions and interests in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28(4), 615–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, L. F., Berman, M. L., & Blanke, D. (2013). Who’s Your Nanny? Choice, paternalism and public health in the age of personal responsibility. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. C. (2011). Securitization and the liberalism of fear. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. K. (1985). The Politics of Safety and Health: Occupational Safety and Health in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wolfe, M. (2012). Putting on the brakes or pressing on the gas? Media attention and the speed of policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woloch, N. (2015). A Class by Herself: Protective Laws for Women Workers, 1890s–1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. B., & Doan, A. (2003). The politics of problem definition: Applying and testing threshold models. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 640–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. M. (2007). Beyond the panopticon? Foucault and surveillance studies. In Elden, S., ed., Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 245–263.Google Scholar
Wood, M. (2016). Paradoxical politics: Emergency, security and the depoliticisation of flooding. Political Studies, 64(3), 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. S. (2006). Tobacco’s tipping point: The Master Settlement Agreement as a focusing event. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuthnow, R. (2010). Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. (2001). Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi, T. (2014). Social imaginary and dilemmas of policy practice: The food safety arena in Japan. Food Policy, 45, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Protective State
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Protective State
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Protective State
Available formats
×