Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T11:15:18.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wittgenstein on Aspect Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Avner Baz
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts

Summary

The perception of what he calls 'aspects' preoccupied Wittgenstein and gave him considerable trouble in his final years. The Wittgensteinian aspect defies any number of traditional philosophical dichotomies: the aspect is neither subjective (inner, metaphysically private) nor objective; it presents perceivable unity and sense that are (arguably) not (yet) conceptual; it is 'subject to the will', but at the same time is normally taken to be genuinely revelatory of the object perceived under it. This Element begins with a grammatical and phenomenological characterization of Wittgensteinian 'aspects'. It then challenges two widespread ideas: that aspects are to be identified with concepts; and that aspect perception has a continuous version that is characteristic of (normal) human perception. It concludes by proposing that aspect perception brings to light the distinction between the world as perceived and the world as objectively construed, and the role we play in the constitution of the former.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781108878012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 26 November 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agam-Segal, R. (2019). ‘Avner Baz on Aspects and Concepts: A Critique’. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1999). How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baylis, G. C. and Driver, J. (1995). ‘One-sided edge assignments in vision: figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects’. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4(5): 140146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baz, A. (2000). ‘What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects?’. Philosophical Investigations 23(2): 97121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baz, A. (2003). ‘On When Words are Called For: Cavell, McDowell, and the Wording of Our World’, Inquiry 46(4): 473500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baz, A. (2010). ‘On Learning from Wittgenstein, or What Does it Take to See the Grammar of Seeing Aspects?’. In Seeing Wittgenstein Anew. Day, W. and Krebs, V. (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press: 227248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baz, A. (2011). ‘Aspect Perception and Philosophical Difficulty’. In Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, McGinn, Marie and Kuusela, Oskari (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press: 697713.Google Scholar
Baz, A. (2012). When Words are Called For. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baz, A. (2017a). The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baz, A. (2017b). ‘Motivational Indeterminacy’. European Journal of Philosophy 25(2): 336–57.Google Scholar
Baz, A. (2018). ‘Wittgenstein and the Difficulty of What Normally Goes Without Saying’. In Language, Form(s) of Life, and Logic: Investigations after Wittgenstein. Martin, C. (ed.). New York: de Gruyter: 253276.Google Scholar
Baz, A. (2019). ‘Bringing the Phenomenal World into View’. In Wittgenstein on Objectivity, Intuition, and Meaning. Conant, James and Greve, Sebastian (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press: 100118.Google Scholar
Baz, A. (2020). The Significance of Aspect Perception: Bringing the Phenomenal World into View. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. (2010). ‘Attention and Mental Paint’. Philosophical Issues 20(1): 2363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N. (2014). ‘Seeing-As in the Light of Vision Science’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89(3): 560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S. (1969). Must We Mean What We Say? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. (1979). The Claim of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, C. (1991). The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
Eilan, N. (2013). ‘On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler’. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 2(3): 119.Google Scholar
Floyd, J. (2010). ‘On Being Surprised: Wittgenstein on Aspect-Perception, Logic, and Mathematics. In Seeing Wittgenstein Anew. Day, W. and Krebs, V. (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press: 314337.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1956). ‘The Thought’. Mind 65(259): 289311.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1999). The Foundations of Arithmetic. Austin, J. L. (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. (1965). ‘Assertion’. Philosophical Review 74(4): 449465.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. David Carr (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1998). The Paris Lectures. Koestenbaum, P. (trans.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P. (1993). Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Guyer, Paul (ed.), Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1927). The Growth of the Mind: An Introduction to Child-Psychology (second edition), M. R. Ogden (trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. (1997). Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. (2010). ‘Wittgenstein and Internal Relations’, European Journal of Philosophy 18(4): 495509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Lefort, C. (ed.), and Lingis, A. (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996/2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Colin Smith (trans.)/Donald Landes (trans). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Modiano, P. (1999). Dora Bruder. Kilmartin. J. (trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (1990). On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (2001). ‘Seeing Aspects’. In Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Glock, H-J (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Munro, A. (1996). Selected Stories. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S. (2010). ‘A Tale of Two Problems: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Aspect Perception’, in Cottingham, J. & Hacker, P.M.S. (eds.), Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny. New York: Oxford University Press: 352371.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1999). Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2015). Seeing Things as They Are: A Theory of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. (1982). ‘Imagination and Perception’. In Kant on Pure Reason. Charles, Ralph Walker, Sutherland (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press: 8299. (Originally published in Experience and Theory, Foster and Swanson (eds.). Amherst, Mass. and London: University of Massachusetts Press and Duckworth, 1971.)Google Scholar
Travis, C. (2013). Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C. (2015). ‘Suffering Intentionally?’. In Wittgenstein and Perception. Campbell, M. and O’Sullivan, M. (eds.). New York: Routledge: 4562.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.). Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I, Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.), tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.), tr. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980c). Culture and Value, von Wright, G. H. (ed.), Winch, P. (tr.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I, von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H. (eds.), tr. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, Barrett, Cyril (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H. (eds.), tr. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Pears, D. and McGuinness, B. (trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009a). Philosophical Investigations, Part I, G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (trans.). Malden, MA: Basil-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009b). Philosophical Investigations, Part II, G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (trans.). Malden, MA: Basil-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and Its Objects (second edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Wittgenstein on Aspect Perception
  • Avner Baz, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Online ISBN: 9781108878012
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Wittgenstein on Aspect Perception
  • Avner Baz, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Online ISBN: 9781108878012
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Wittgenstein on Aspect Perception
  • Avner Baz, Tufts University, Massachusetts
  • Online ISBN: 9781108878012
Available formats
×