Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-17T10:22:35.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in the Philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein

Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2024

Danièle Moyal-Sharrock  and
Duncan Pritchard
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Duncan Pritchard
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine

Summary

An overview is offered of Wittgenstein's groundbreaking discussion of knowledge and certainty, especially in his final notebooks, published as On Certainty. The main interpretative readings of On Certainty are discussed, especially a non-propositional/non-epistemic interpretation and a variety of propositional and/or epistemic interpretations. Surveys are offered of the readings of On Certainty presented by such figures as Annalisa Coliva, John Greco, Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Duncan Pritchard, Genia Schönbaumsfeld, P. F. Strawson, MichaelWilliams, and CrispinWright. This Element demonstrates how On Certainty has been especially groundbreaking for epistemology with regard to its treatment of the problem of radical scepticism.
Get access

Keywords

Ludwig Wittgensteinknowledgecertaintyepistemologyscepticism
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in the Philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein
Online ISBN: 9781108946599
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 09 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, F. D., & Gage, L. P. (2023). ‘Newman and Quasi-Fideism: A Reply to Duncan Pritchard’, Heythrop Journal 64, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazin, J. (2002). ‘Si un lion … ’, Philosophia Scientiæ, 6, 127–46.Google Scholar
Bell, R. H. (1995). ‘Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy: Beyond Fideism and Language Games’, in Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief (eds.) Tessin, T. & von der Ruhr, M., 215–48, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bennett-Hunter, G. (2019). ‘Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism and Interreligious Communication’, in Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies (eds.) Andrejč, G. & Weiss, D. H., 157–73, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boncompagni, A. (2022). ‘Religious Hinges: Some Historical Precursors’, Topoi 41, 955–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. (1993). ‘Content Preservation’, Philosophical Review 102, 457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. (2003). ‘Perceptual Entitlement’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67, 503–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, J. J. (2011). ‘Making Sense of Doubt: Strawson’s Anti-Scepticism’, Theoria 77, 261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. A. (2017). ‘Epistemic Pluralism, Epistemic Relativism and “Hinge” Epistemology’, in Epistemic Pluralism (eds.) Coliva, A. & Pedersen, N. J. L. L., 229–52, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. (2007). The Possibility of Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S. (1979). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1999). ‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives 13, 57–89.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2010 a). Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2010 b). ‘Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?’, Philosophical Investigations 33, 1–23.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2013). ‘Hinges and Certainty. A Précis of Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense’, Philosophia 41, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2014). ‘Moderatism, Transmission Failures, Closure, and Humean Scepticism’, Scepticism and Perceptual Justification (eds.) Dodd, D. & Zardini, E., 248–72, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2015). Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2016) ‘Which Hinge Epistemology?’ International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 6 (2–3), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2019). ‘Hinge Epistemology and Relativism’, in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (ed.) Kusch, M., 320–28, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. (2022). Wittgenstein Rehinged, London: Anthem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2023). ‘Hinges in the Knowledge Economy: On Greco’s Common and Procedural Knowledge’, Synthese 201, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A. (2024). ‘Religious Hinges?’, manuscript.Google Scholar
Coliva, A., & Moyal-Sharrock, D. (eds.). (2017). Hinge Epistemology, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A., Moyal-Sharrock, D. & Pritchard, D. H. (Forthcoming). ‘Moyal-Sharrock’s, Pritchard’s and Coliva’s Wittgenstein: The Hinge Epistemology Program’, in Wittgenstein and Other Philosophers: His Influence on Historical and Contemporary Analytic Philosophers (Vol. I) (eds.) Hossein Khani, A. & Kemp, G., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coliva, A., & Palmira, M. (2020). ‘Hinge Disagreement’, Social Epistemology and Epistemic Relativism (ed.) Kusch, M., 11–29, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A., & Pritchard, D. H. (2022). Scepticism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crary, A., & Read, R. (eds.). (2000). The New Wittgenstein, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (1995). ‘Solving the Skeptical Problem’, Philosophical Review 104, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Ceglie, R. (2017). ‘Faith and Reason: A Response to Duncan Pritchard,’ Philosophy 92, 231–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ridder, J. (2019). ‘Against Quasi-Fideism’, Faith and Philosophy 36, 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1970). ‘Epistemic Operators’, Journal of Philosophy 67, 1007–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, D. (2021). ‘Rule Following, Anxiety, and Authenticity’, Mind 130, 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoigne, N. (2019). Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty, London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, E. (1963). ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23, 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. (2024) ‘Philosophy Rehinged?’ in his Normativity, Meaning and Philosophy: Essays on Wittgenstein, 63–88, London: Anthem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Alonso, M. (2021). ‘Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Hinge Epistemology’, Skepsis 12, 18–34.Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2016). ‘Common Knowledge’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6, 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. (2020). The Transmission of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, P., & Pritchard, D. H. (eds.). (2009). Williamson on Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. (2001). ‘When the Whistling Had to Stop’, in his Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies, 141–69, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998). ‘Pyrrhonism’, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/pyrrhonism/v-1.Google Scholar
Harrison, B. (2013). ‘The Epistemology of Know-How’, PhD thesis, University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. (2005). ‘The Case for Closure’, in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (eds.) Sosa, E. & Steup, M., 26–43, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. (2014). ‘Contentless Perceiving: The very idea’, in Wittgenstein and Perception (eds.) Campbell, M. & O’Sullivan, M., 63–83, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. (2019). ‘Hinge Epistemology, Radical Skepticism, and Domain Specific Skepticism’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9, 116–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusch, M. (2016). ‘Wittgenstein’s On Certainty and Relativism’, in Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives (eds.) Rinofner-Kreidl, S. & Wiltsche, H. A., 29–46, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerspetz, O. (2021). ‘The Linguistic Idealism Question: Wittgenstein’s Method and His Rejection of Realism’, Wittgenstein-Studien 12, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1996). ‘Elusive Knowledge’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74, 549–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljiljanaa, R., & Slavišab, K. (2017). ‘Religious Hinge Commitments: Developing Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism’, Belgrade Philosophical Annual 30, 235–56.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1952). ‘Knowledge & Belief’, Mind 61, 178–89.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1982). ‘Wittgenstein: The Relation of Language to Instinctive Behaviour’, in Wittgenstein Themes: Essays 1978–1989, (ed.) von Wright, G.H., 66–86, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1995) ‘Wittgenstein and Idealism’, in Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays 1978–1989 (ed.) von Wright, G. H., 87–109, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (2018). ‘A Memoir’, in Portraits of Wittgenstein: Abridged Edition (eds.) Flowers, F. A. III & Ground, I., 619–72, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Malmgrem, H. (1983). Immediate Knowledge: A Study in G. E. Moore’s Epistemology, Sweden: Doxa.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. (1989). Sense and Certainty: A Dissolution of Scepticism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. (2010). ‘Ludwig Wittgenstein’, in Routledge Companion to Epistemology (eds.) Bernecker, S. & Pritchard, D. H., 763–73, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (2007). The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1925). ‘A Defence of Common Sense’, in Philosophical Papers, 32–59, London: George Unwin, 1959.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1939). ‘Proof of an External World’, in his Philosophical Papers, 127–50, London: George Unwin.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1957). Some Main Problems of Philosophy, Leicester: Blackfriars Press.Google Scholar
Morawetz, T. (1979). Wittgenstein and Knowledge: The Importance of ‘On Certainty, Cambridge, MA: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2002). ‘The Third Wittgenstein and the Category Mistake of Philosophical Scepticism’, in Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy: A Reassessment after 50 Years (eds.) Haller, R. & Puhl, K., 293–305, Vienna: öbv & hpt.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2003). ‘Logic in Action: Wittgenstein’s Logical Pragmatism and the Impotence of Scepticism’, Philosophical Investigations 26, 125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2004). The Third Wittgenstein: The post-Investigations works, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2005). Understanding Wittgenstein’s on Certainty, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2007 a). ‘The Good Sense of Nonsense: A Reading of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus as Nonself-Repudiating’, Philosophy 82, 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2007 b). ‘Wittgenstein on Psychological Certainty’, in Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology (ed.) Moyal-Sharrock, D., 211–35, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2016). ‘The Animal in Epistemology: Wittgenstein’s Enactivist Solution to the Problem of Regress’, Hinge Epistemology (eds.) Coliva, A. & Moyal-Sharrock, D., 24–47, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2017). ‘Fighting Relativism: Wittgenstein and Kuhn’, in Realism – Relativism – Constructivism (eds.) Kanzian, C., Kletzl, S. & Neges, K., 215–32, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2019). ‘Wittgenstein’s Grammar: Through Thick and Thin’, in Wittgensteinian (adj.): Looking at the World from the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy (eds.) Wuppuluri, S. & da Costa, N., 39–54, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2021 a). ‘Restoring Certainty’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11, 143–58.Google Scholar
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2021 b). Certainty in Action: Wittgenstein on Language, Mind & Epistemology, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. (1967). ‘Wittgensteinian Fideism’, Philosophy 42, 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Hara, N. (2018). Moral Certainty and the Foundations of Morality, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. Z. (1976). Religion without Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pleasants, N. (2008). ‘Wittgenstein, Ethics and Basic Moral Certainty’, Inquiry 51, 241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2002). ‘Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 64, 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2005). Epistemic Luck, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2010 a). ‘Epistemic Relativism, Epistemic Incommensurability and Wittgensteinian Epistemology’, in The Blackwell Companion to Relativism (ed.) Hales, S., 266–85, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2010 b). ‘Relevant Alternatives, Perceptual Knowledge, and Discrimination’, Noûs 44, 245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2011 a). ‘Wittgenstein on Scepticism’, in Oxford Handbook on Wittgenstein (eds.) Kuusela, O. & McGinn, M., 521–47, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2011 b). ‘Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism’, Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 4, 145–59.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2012 a). Epistemological Disjunctivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2012 b). ‘Wittgenstein and the Groundlessness of Our Believing’, Synthese 189, 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2015 a). Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2015 b). ‘Wittgenstein on Faith and Reason: The Influence of Newman’, in God, Truth and Other Enigmas (ed.) Szatkowski, M., 141–64, Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2017 a). ‘Faith and Reason’, Philosophy 81, 101–18.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2017 b). ‘Wittgenstein on Hinge Commitments and Radical Scepticism in On Certainty’, in Blackwell Companion to Wittgenstein (eds.) Glock, H.-J. & Hyman, J., 563–75, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2018 a). ‘Disagreement, of Belief and Otherwise’, in Voicing Dissent: The Ethics and Epistemology of Making Disagreement Public (ed.) Johnson, C., 22–39, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2018 b). ‘Epistemic Angst’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2018 c). ‘Quasi-Fideism and Religious Conviction’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2018 d). ‘Unnatural Doubts’, in Skepticism: Historical and Contemporary Inquiries (eds.) Bruno, G. A. & Rutherford, A., 223–47, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2018 e). ‘Wittgensteinian Hinge Epistemology and Deep Disagreement’, Topoi 40, 1117–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9612-y.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2019 a). ‘Wittgensteinian Epistemology, Epistemic Vertigo, and Pyrrhonian Scepticism’, in Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus (eds.) Vlasits, J. & Vogt, K. M., 172–92, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2019 b). ‘Wittgenstein’s on Certainty as Pyrrhonism in Action’, in Wittgensteinian (adj.): Looking at Things from the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy (eds.) de Costa, N. & Wuppuluri, S., 91–106, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2020). ‘Epistemic Vertigo’, in The Philosophy and Psychology of Ambivalence: Being of Two Minds, (eds.) Brogaard, B. & Gatzia, D., 110–128, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2021 a). ‘Cavell and Philosophical Vertigo’, Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 9, 7–22.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2021 b). ‘Ignorance and Inquiry’, American Philosophical Quarterly 58, 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2021 c). ‘Ignorance and Normativity’, Philosophical Topics 49, 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2021 d). ‘Sceptical Fideism and Quasi-Fideism’, Manuscrito 44, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2022 a). ‘Exploring Quasi-Fideism’, in Extending Hinge Epistemology, (eds.) Moyal-Sharrock, D. & Sandis, C., 26–48, London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2022 b). ‘Hinge Commitments and Common Knowledge’, Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03647-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2022 c). ‘In Defence of Closure’, in New Perspectives on Epistemic Closure, (eds.) Jope, M. & Pritchard, D. H., 113–30, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2022 d). ‘Quasi-Fideism and Epistemic Relativism’, Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2135820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2023 a). ‘Hinge Commitments and Trust’, Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04378-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2023 b). ‘Understanding Deep Disagreement’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2023.2263709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2024 a). ‘Religious Vertigo’, in Religionsphilosophie nach Wittgenstein (Philosophy of Religion after Wittgenstein), (ed.) Ramharter, E., 287–306. Stuttgart: Metzler/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2024 b). ‘Epistemic Vertigo and Existential Angst’, Conversations: Journal of Cavellian Studies 11, 17–36.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2024 c). ‘Beliefs, Delusions, Hinge Commitments’, Synthese 204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04703-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2024 d). ‘Hume and Wittgenstein on Naturalism and Scepticism’, in Hume and Contemporary Epistemology, (eds.) Stapleford, S. & Wagner, V., 206–20, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (2025). ‘Deep Disagreement’, in Routledge Handbook to Philosophy of Disagreement, (eds.) Baghramian, M., Carter, J. A. & Rowland, R., ch. 4, 31–61, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (Forthcominga). ‘Honest Doubt: Quasi-Fideism and Epistemic Vertigo’, in Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Religion, (eds.) Pritchard, D. H. & Venturinha, N., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (Forthcomingb). ‘Pyrrhonism and Wittgensteinian Quietism’, in Ancient Scepticism and Contemporary Philosophy, (eds.) Perissinotto, L. & Cámara, B. R., Milan: Mimesis International.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (Forthcomingc). ‘Quasi-Fideism and Virtuous Anti-Evidentialism: Wittgenstein and Newman on Knowledge and Certainty’, in Newman and Contemporary Philosophy, (eds.) Milburn, J. & Aquino, F., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. (Forthcomingd). ‘Strawson and Wittgenstein on Hinge Commitments’, in Skepticism and Naturalism: Hume, Wittgenstein, Strawson, (eds.) Hyman, J., Ohta, Y. & Thorne, M., Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1998). ‘Strawson and Skepticism’, in The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, (ed.) Hahn, L. E., 273–87, Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Ranalli, C. (2020). ‘Deep Disagreement and Hinge Epistemology’, Synthese 197, 4975–5007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, C. (2021 a). ‘Are There Heavyweight Perceptual Reasons?’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, C. (2021 b). ‘Moral Hinges and Steadfastness’, Metaphilosophy 52, 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, R., & Lavery, M. (eds.). (2011). Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1910). ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11, 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy, (ed.) Perry, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., & Moyal-Sharrock, D. (eds.). (2022). Extending Hinge Epistemology, London: Anthem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2016). The Illusion of Doubt, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2017). ‘Beliefs-in-a-Vat’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117, 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2019). ‘Was Wittgenstein a Disjunctivist Avant la Lettre?’, in New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism, (eds.) Doyle, C., Milburn, J. & Pritchard, D. H., 113–30, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2021 a). ‘Précis of The Illusion of Doubt’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2021 b). ‘Response to Critics (Ranalli, Williams, Moyal-Sharrock)’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11, 159–75.Google Scholar
Schroeder, S. (2024) ‘Farewell to Hinge Propositions’ in his Language, Mind, and Value: Essays on Wittgenstein, 145–60, London: Anthem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H. (2021). ‘Hinges, Disagreements, and Arguments: (Rationally) Believing Hinge Propositions and Arguing across Deep Disagreements’, Topoi 40, 1107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, H. (2004). ‘Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism’, in Pyrrhonian Skepticism, (ed.) Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 99–117, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. (2021). ‘How to Hang a Door: Picking Hinges for Quasi-Fideism’, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. (1998). ‘P. F. Strawson’s Epistemological Naturalism’, in The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, (ed.) Hahn, L. E., 361–69, Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2003). ‘On Strawson’s Naturalistic Turn’, in Strawson and Kant, (ed.) Glock, H.-J., 219–34, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, L. (2002). ‘Six Levels of Mentality’, Philosophical Explorations 5, 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1966). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1985). Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1998 a). ‘Reply to Ernest Sosa’, in The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, (ed.) Hahn, L. E., 370–72, Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1998 b). ‘Reply to Hilary Putnam’, in The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, (ed.) Hahn, L. E., 288–92, Chicago IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Stroll, A. (1994). Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroll, A. (2002). ‘Understanding on Certainty: Entry 194’, in Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy, (eds.) Haller, R., & Puhl, K., 446–56, Vienna: oebvhpt.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. (1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, G. (1981). On Doubting the Reality of Reality: Moore and Wittgenstein on Sceptical Doubts, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Thébert, A. (2023). ‘Peut-on comprendre le sceptique?’, Revue de metaphysique et de morale 3, 311–33.Google Scholar
Tiercelin, C. (2010). ‘Peirce et Wittgenstein: deux strategies pragmatistes face au defi sceptique’, Paradigmi 3, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gennip, K. (2008) ‘Wittgenstein’s on Certainty in the Making: Studies into Its Historical and Philosophical Background’ PhD thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (1982). Wittgenstein, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinten, R. (2022). ‘Wittgenstein, Quasi-Fideism, and Scepticism’, Topoi 41, 967–78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09832-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. (1991). Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2004). ‘Wittgenstein’s Refutation of Idealism’, in Wittgenstein and Scepticism, (ed.) McManus, D., 76–96, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2017). ‘How Hinges Can Be Knowledge’, manuscript.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2018). ‘Illusions of Doubt: Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty’, in Skepticism: from Antiquity to the Present, (eds.) Machuca, D. & Reed, B., 371–89, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2021 a). ‘No Shadow of a Doubt: Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty; Neglected Themes’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45, 179–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. (2021 b). ‘Knowledge without “Experience”’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11, 119–42.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (Forthcoming). ‘Fideism, Skepticism and “Hinge” Epistemology’, in Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Religion, (eds.) Pritchard, D. H. & Venturinha, N., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004 a). ‘Hinge Propositions and the Serenity Prayer’, in Knowledge and Belief, Proceedings of the 26th International Wittgenstein Symposium, (eds.) Loffler, W. & Weingartner, P., 287–306, Vienna: Holder-Pickler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004 b). ‘Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (supp.) 78, 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (2022). ‘Closure and Transmission Again’, in New Perspectives on Epistemic Closure, (eds.) Jope, M. & Pritchard, D. H., 163–90, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Wittgenstein’s Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, (ed.) Barrett, C., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty
Available formats
×