Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:48:54.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect sizes I: differences between means

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic*
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia
*
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic, Black Dog Institute Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. Tel: +61 2 9382 3716; Fax: +61 2 9382 3712; E-mail: d.hadzi-pavlovic@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Statistically Speaking
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , October 2007 , pp. 318 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1962;65:145–153. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, GV. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;10:3–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, RB. Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, RJ, Kim, JJ. Effect sizes for research: a broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005. Google Scholar