Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T14:28:14.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overly determined agents prevent consensus in a generalized Deffuant model on ℤ with dispersed opinions

Part of: Special processes Time-dependent statistical mechanics (dynamic and nonequilibrium) Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Timo Hirscher
Timo Hirscher*
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
*
* Postal address: Institute of Mathematics, Goethe-Universität, 60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Email address: hirscher@math.uni-frankfurt.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the last decades, quite a number of interacting particle systems have been introduced and studied in the crossover area of mathematics and statistical physics. Some of these can be seen as simplistic models for opinion formation processes in groups of interacting people. In the model introduced by Deffuant et al. (2000), agents that are neighbors on a given network graph, randomly meet in pairs and approach a compromise if their current opinions do not differ by more than a given threshold value θ. We consider the two-sided infinite path ℤ as the underlying graph and extend existing models to a setting in which opinions are given by probability distributions. Similar to what has been shown for finite-dimensional opinions, we observe a dichotomy in the long-term behavior of the model, but only if the initial narrow mindedness of the agents is restricted.

Keywords

Deffuant modelopinion dynamicsrandom measuretotal variation distance

MSC classification

Primary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
Secondary: 60G57: Random measures 82C22: Interacting particle systems
Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 722 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Castellano, C., Fortunato, S. and Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591–646. Google Scholar
[2] Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G. and Faure, T. (2002). How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J. Artificial Societies Social Simul. 5. Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html. Google Scholar
[3] Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F. and Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–98. Google Scholar
[4] Fortunato, S. (2004). Universality of the threshold for complete consensus for the opinion dynamics of Deffuant et al . Internat. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 1301–1307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Grandell, J. (1977). Point processes and random measures. Adv. Appl. Prob. 9, 502–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Häggström, O. (2012). A pairwise averaging procedure with application to consensus formation in the Deffuant model. Acta Appl. Math. 119, 185–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Häggström, O. and Hirscher, T. (2014). Further results on consensus formation in the Deffuant model. Electron. J. Prob. 19, 19. Google Scholar
[8] Häggström, O. and Hirscher, T. (2015). Water transport on graphs. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03978. Google Scholar
[9] Hirscher, T. (2014). The Deffuant model on ℤ with higher-dimensional opinion spaces. ALEA Latin Amer. J. Prob. Math. Statist. 11, 409–444. Google Scholar
[10] Kallenberg, O. (1983). Random Measures, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. Google Scholar
[12] Lanchier, N. (2012). The critical value of the Deffuant model equals one half. ALEA Latin Amer. J. Prob. Math. Statist. 9, 383–402. Google Scholar
[13] Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, New York. Google Scholar
[14] Lorenz, J. (2006). Continuous opinion dynamics of multidimensional allocation problems under bounded confidence. More dimensions lead to better chances for consensus. Euro. J. Econom. Social Syst. 19, 213–227. Google Scholar
[15] Newman, C. M. and Schulman, L. S. (1981). Infinite clusters in percolation models. J. Statist. Phys. 26, 613–628. Google Scholar
[16] Rubin, H. (1956). Uniform convergence of random functions with applications to statistics. Ann. Math. Statist. 27, 200–203. Google Scholar
[17] Shang, Y. (2013). Deffuant model with general opinion distributions: first impression and critical confidence bound. Complexity 19, 38–49. Google Scholar
[18] Shang, Y. (2014). An agent based model for opinion dynamics with random confidence threshold. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 3766–3777. Google Scholar
[19] Shang, Y. (2014). Consensus formation of two-level opinion dynamics. Acta Math. Sci. B 34, 1029–1040. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Shang, Y. (2015). Deffuant model of opinion formation in one-dimensional multiplex networks. J. Phys. A 48, 395101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F. and Nadal, J.-P. (2002). Meet, discuss, and segregate! Complexity 7, 55–63. Google Scholar