Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T23:24:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tomb with a View

New Methods for Bridging the Gap Between Land and Sky in Megalithic Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Fabio Silva
Fabio Silva*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, History and Anthropology, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter Campus, Ceredigion SA48 7ED, United Kingdom; and Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom (fabio.silva@ucl.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The orientations of European prehistoric structures have been studied independently by landscape archaeologists and archaeoastronomers. Despite their similar interests, the two fields have failed to converge primarily because of their differing epistemologies. This paper argues that archaeology has much to gain by integrating the two fields to provide a fuller and more balanced exploration and understanding of the location and orientation of the European megaliths. It is suggested that prehistoric archaeoastronomy needs to become more grounded on the archaeological record and context of the prehistoric structures it studies. If it is to generate knowledge of value to archaeology it needs to become a “skyscape archaeology.” This paper looks at current archaeoastronomical approaches through the lens of archaeological practice. It identifies some limitations and discusses how landscape archaeology can inform archaeoastronomy on overcoming them. A methodology that attempts this necessary cross-fertilization, by shedding unfounded assumptions and developing a more phenomenological approach to pattern-recognition, is proposed. This methodology is applied to a case study in central Portugal. The emergent narrative, linking a cluster of dolmens to a local mountain range and the star Aldebaran, not only fits the archaeological record, but is mirrored by local folklore, lending further support to the validity of this methodology.

El estudio de las orientaciones de las estructuras prehistóricas europeas se ha llevado a cabo de forma independiente por los arqueólogos del paisaje y por los arqueoastrónomos. A pesar de sus intereses similares, los dos campos no han podido converger, sobre todo, debido a sus diferentes epistemologías. Este trabajo sustenta que, la arqueología tiene mucho que ganar con la integración de los dos campos, al proporcionar una exploración y comprensión más completa y equilibrada de la localización y orientación de los megalitos europeos. La arqueoastronomía prehistórica, como se sugiere, necesita apoyarse más en el registro arqueológico y en el contexto de las estructuras prehistóricas que estudia. Si se trata de generar conocimiento de valor para la arqueología, ésta debe convertirse en una “arqueología del skyscape”. Este trabajo examina los planteamientos de la arqueoastronomía a través de la práctica arqueológica. Este mismo identifica algunas limitaciones y analiza cómo la arqueología de paisaje puede indicar a la arqueoastronomía el cómo superarlas. Una metodología que intenta esta necesaria hibridación, desechando suposiciones infundadas y el desarrollo de una perspectiva más fenomenológica al reconocimiento de patrones, es la propuesta. Esta metodología se aplica a un caso de estudio en el centro de Portugal. La narrativa que surge y que relaciona a un conjunto de dólmenes con una cadena montañosa local y con la Estrella Aldebarán, no sólo se presenta en el registro arqueológico, sino que está reflejada en el folklore local, dándole un mayor apoyo a la validez de esta metodología.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 24 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Andrade, Marco António 2013 Em torno ao conceito de “necrópole megalítica” na area da Ribeira Grande (Alto Alentejo, Portugal): monumentos, espaços, paisagens e territórios. In Arqueologia em Portugal—150 anos, pp. 427–433. AAP, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Araújo, João, Connor, Simon E., van Leeuwen, Jacqueline F. N., and van der Knaap, Willem O. 2012 História do fogo durante o Holocénico na Serra da Estrela, Portugal: Resultados Preliminares. In Environmental Changes and Human Interaction along the Western Atlantic Edge, edited by Almeida, A.C., Bettencourt, A.M.S., Moura, D., Monteiro-Rodrigues, S., and Alves, M.I.C., pp.107–114. APEQ, Coimbra.Google Scholar
Belmonte, Juan Antonio, and César González-García, A. 2012 The “Genetic” Analysis of Iberian Dolmens: A Test of the Idea in the Central Pyrenees. Journal for the History of Astronomy 43:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Bernadette 2014 Star Phases: The Naked-Eye Astronomy of the Old Kingdom Pyramid Texts. In Skyscapes in Archaeology: The Role and Importance of the Sky, edited by Fabio Silva and Nicholas Campion, ch. 7. Oxbow, Oxford, in press.Google Scholar
Campion, Nicholas 2014 Skyscapes: Locating Archaeoastronomy within Academia. In Skyscapes in Archaeology: The Role and Importance of the Sky, edited by Fabio Silva and Nicholas Campion, ch. 2. Oxbow, Oxford, in press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J. L, and González, A. 2002 Testemunhos da ocupação pré-histórica da Serra da Estrela. Al-madan 11:242–243.Google Scholar
Cruz, Domingos 1995 Cronologia dos monumentos com tumulus do Noroeste peninsular e da Beira Alta. Estudos Pré-Históricos 3:81–120.Google Scholar
Cruz, Domingos 2001 O Alto Paiva: megalitismo, diversidade tumular e práticas rituais durante a Pré-história Recente. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
Cummings, Vicky 2001 Landscapes in Transition? Exploring the Origins of Monumentality in South-West Wales and South-West Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, School of History and Archaeology, University of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Cummings, V., Jones, Andrew, and Watson, Aaron 2002 Divided Places: Phenomenology and Asymmetry in the Monuments of the Black Mountains, Southeast Wales. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 12(1):57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espírito Santo, Moisés 1988 Origens Orientais da Religião Popular Portuguesa. Assírio & Alvim, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Evans, E. Estyn, 1957 Irish Folk Ways. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Flood, Josephine 1990 Archaeology of the Dreamtime: The Story of Prehistoric Australia and Its People. 2nd ed. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M. 2007 Evidence in Favor of the Palaeolithic Continuity Refugium Theory (PCRT): ‘Hamalau’ and Its Linguistic and Cultural Relatives, Part 1. Insula 4:91–131.Google Scholar
González-García, A. César, and Belmonte, Juan Antonio 2010 Statistical Analysis of Megalithic Tomb Orientations in the Iberian Peninsula and Neighbouring Regions. Journal for the History of Astronomy 41:225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-García, A. César, Ferrer, Lourdes Costa, and Belmonte, Juan Antonio 2007 Solarists vs. Lunatics: Modelling Patterns in Megalithic Astronomy. In Lights and Shadows in Cultural Astronomy, edited by Mauro Peppino Zedda and Juan Antonio Belmonte, pp. 23–30. Associazione Archeofila Sarda, Sardinia.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Gerald S. 1965 Stonehenge Decoded. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
Henty, Liz 2014a An Examination of the Divide between Archaeoastronomy and Archaeology. In Skyscapes in Archaeology: the Role and Importance of the Sky, edited by Silva, Fabio and Campion, Nicholas , ch. 3. Oxbow, Oxford, in press.Google Scholar
Henty, Liz 2014b The Archaeoastronomy of Tomnaverie Recumbent Stone Circle: A Comparison of Methodologies. Manuscript on file, School of Archaeology, History and Anthropology, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael 2001 Tombs, Temples and their Orientations. Ocarina Books, Bognor Regis.Google Scholar
Knight, Chris 1991 Blood Relations: Menstruation and the Origins of Culture. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Kosowsky, Michael 2013 HeyWhatsThat Testbed. Electronic resource, http://www.heywhatsthat.com/, accessed May 24, 2013.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, 1986 [1964] The Raw and the Cooked: Introduction to a Science of Mythology, Vol. 1. Translated by Weightman, J. and Weightman, D. . Penguin Books, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Lozano, José Antonio, Ruiz-Puertas, Gerardo, Hódar-Correa, Manuel, Pérez-Valera, Fernando, and Morgado, Antonio 2014 Prehistoric Engineering and Astronomy of the Great Menga Dolmen (Málaga, Spain). A Geometric and Geoarchaeological Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 41:759–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, Mike 2012 Stonehenge: Exploring the Greatest Stone Age Mystery. Simon & Schuster, London.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Clive L. N. 1999 Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Clive L.N. 2005 Archaeoastronomy. In Archaeology: The Key Concepts, edited by Renfrew, C. and Bahn, P., pp. 11–16. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Clive L.N. 2011 Pushing Back the Frontiers or Still Running around the Same Circles? ‘Interpretative Archaeoastronomy’ Thirty Years On. Proceedings IAU Symposium 278:1–18. Lima.Google Scholar
Scarre, Chris 2011 Landscapes of Neolithic Brittany. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Brad E. 1987 Heliacal Rise Phenomena. Journal for the History of Astronomy 18:S19–S33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Brad E. 2000 The Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Journal for the History of Astronomy 31:149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senna-Martinez, João Carlos, López-Plaza, M.S., and Hoskin, Michael 1997 Territorio, ideología y cultura material en el megalitismo de la plataforma del Mondego (Centro de Portugal). In O Neolítico Atlántico e as Orixes do Megalitismo, edited by Casal, A. A. R., pp. 657–676. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Senna-Martinez, João Carlos, and Ventura, José Manuel Q. 2008a Do Mundo das Sombras ao Mundo dos Vivos: Octávio da Veiga Ferreira e o Megalitismo da Beira Alta, meio século depois. Estudos Arqueológicos de Oeiras 16:317–350.Google Scholar
Senna-Martinez, João Carlos, and Ventura, José Manuel Q. 2008b Neolitização e Megalitismo na Plataforma do Mondego: Algumas Reflexões sobre a Transição Neolítico Antigo/Neolítico Médio. In Actas do IV Congreso del Neolítico en la Península Ibérica, edited by Hernández Pérez, M. S., Soler Díaz, J. A. and López Padilla, J. A., pp. 77–84. Museo Arqueológico de Alicante – MARQ, Alicante.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio 2010 Cosmology and the Neolithic: A New Survey of Neolithic Dolmens in Central Portugal. Journal of Cosmology 9:3094–3106.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio 2013a Landscape and Astronomy in Megalithic Portugal: The Carregal do Sal Nucleus and Star Mountain Range. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 22:99–114.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio 2013b Astronomia e Paisagem no Megalitismo do Norte do País: Problemas e Perspectivas. In Arqueologia em Portugal—150 anos, pp. 427–433. AAP, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio 2014 The View from Within: A ‘Time-Space-Action’ Approach to Megalithism in Central Portugal. In Skyscapes in Archaeology: The Role and Importance of the Sky, edited by Fabio Silva and Nicholas Campion, ch. 10. Oxbow, Oxford, in press.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio, and Campion, Nicholas 2014 Skyscapes in Archaeology: The Role and Importance of the Sky. Oxbow, Oxford, in press.Google Scholar
Sims, Lionel 2006 The “Solarization” of the Moon: Manipulated Knowledge at Stonehenge. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16(2):191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, John M. 2007 Calendars and Years: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient Near East. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Steele, James, and Rockman, Marcy 2003 “Where Do We Go from Here?” Modelling the Decision-Making Process during Exploratory Dispersal. In Colonization of Unfamiliar Landscapes: the Archaeology of Adaptation, pp. 130–143. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Stellarium Development Team 2013 Stellarium 0.12.4. Electronic document, http://www.stellarium.org/, accessed October 28, 2013.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher 1994 A Phenomenology of Landscape. Berg Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
Valera, António Carlos 1998 A Neolitização da Bacia Interior do Mondego. Estudos Pré-Históricos 6:131–148.Google Scholar
Wheatley, David 1995 Cumulative Viewshed Analysis: A GIS-based Method for Investigating Intervisibility, and Its Archaeological Application. In Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems, edited by Gary Lock and Zoran Stancic, pp.171–187. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Witzel, E. J. Michael 2012 The Origins of the World’s Mythologies. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar