Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:06:00.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy and Precision of Intensities in X-Ray Polycrystalline Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

W. Parrish  and
T. C. Huang
W. Parrish
Affiliation:
IBM Research Laboratory, 5600 Cottle Road, San Jose, California 95193
T. C. Huang
Affiliation:
IBM Research Laboratory, 5600 Cottle Road, San Jose, California 95193
Get access

Abstract

The integrated and peak intensities of a series of silicon powder samples of various crystallite sizes were measured with a computer automated diffractometer and a profile fitting method (PFM). The accuracy of the PFM was better than 0.003% in computing the integrated intensities. The PFM gave more precise values than would be expected from counting statistics of the peak intensity. The average difference between each measurement and the average intensity was 0.5% with little dependence oo the absolute intensity. Crystallite sizes have a large effect and it is essential to rotate the specimen around the diffraction vector. The best results were obtained with <10 μm particles. Larger sizes decrease the absolute intensities and change the relative intensities. Structure refinement using the POWLS (powder least squares refinement) program showed the presence of (111) preferred orientation even in the <10 μm specimens. R(Bragg) decreased from 4.3% to 0.7% by including the preferred orientation correction in the refinement.

Type
I. Accuracy in X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 26: Thirty-First Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 1-6, 1982 , 1982 , pp. 35 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Parrish, W., Ayers, G. L. and Huang, T. C., A Minocomputer and Methodology for X-Ray Analysis, Adv. X-Ray Anal. 23:313–2 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Parrish, W., Huang, T. C. and Ayers, G. L., X-Ray Polycrystalline Diffraction:Program Deacription-Opeiations Manual, 2nd ed., IBM Research. Report RJ 3524 (41681), June 12, 1982Google Scholar
3. Parrish, W. and Huang, T. C., Accuracy of the Profile Fitting Method for X-Ray Poly crystallite Diffractometry, Symp. on Accuracy in Powder Diffraction, in:Nat. Bur. Stand. Spec. Pub. 457, 95–110.Google Scholar
4. Parrish, W., “X-Ray Analysis Papers,” Centrex Publ. Co., Eindhoven (1965).Google Scholar
5. DeWolff, P. M., Taylor, J. and Parrish, W., Experimental Study of Effect of Crystallite Size Statistics on X-Ray Diffractometer Intensities, Journal Appl. Phys. 30:63–69 (1959).Google Scholar
6. Hubbard, C. R., Swanson, H. E. and Mauer, F. A., A Silicon Powder Diffraction Standard Reference Material, Journal Appl. Cryst. 8:45–48 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Will, G., POWLS:A Powder Least-Squartes Program, Journal Appl. Cryst. 12:483–2 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Will, G., Parrish, W. and Huang, T. C., Crystal Structure Refinement by Profile Fitting and Least Squares Analysis of Powder Diffractometer Data, in preparation.Google Scholar
9. Rietveld, H. M., A Profile Refinement Method for Nuclear and Magnetic Structures, Journal Appl. Cryst. 2:65–71 (1969).Google Scholar