Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:19:36.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Diffraction of Thin Oxide Films on Soldered Module Pins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

T. Paul Adi
Affiliation:
General Technology Division IBM Corporation Manassas, Virginia
H. F. Stehmeyer
Affiliation:
General Technology Division IBM Corporation Manassas, Virginia
Get access

Abstract

The presence of metal oxide films from wave solder baths on timed module pins are partly responsible for non-wet problems in subsequent soldering steps. The cylindrical geometry of the pins lends itself to the characterization of thin oxide films by using the highly sensitive Debye-Scherrer camera method. As confirmed by Electron Hicroprobe Analysis (EMA), pins containing thin oxide films were used to obtain the diffraction patterns. A software program was developed that subtracts the diffraction angles of an oxids-free control pin from the pattern of the contaminated pin, and tabulates the residual d-spacing (interplanar distance) of the contaminant film.

Type
VI. Analysis of Thin Films by XRD and XRF
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Feder, R. and Berry, B.S., Seeman-Bohlin X-Ray Diffraction for Thin Films, J. Appl. Cryst. 3:372 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Wasserman, G. and Wiewiorosky, J., Uber ein Geiger-Zahlrohr-Goniometer nach dem Seeman-Bohlin-Prinzip, Z. Metallk. 44:567 (1963).Google Scholar
3. Cullity, B.D., “Elements of X-Ray Diffraction,” 2nd ed. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1978).Google Scholar
4. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania (1974).Google Scholar