Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T23:13:15.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a micro air vehicle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

S. Watkins
S. Watkins*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering RMIT University, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aerodynamic characteristics of five planar flying wing plan-forms suitable for micro air vehicles (MAVs) are investigated via a series of wind-tunnel tests. The external boundary of the five plan-forms result from slender carbon fibre (CF) struts under various degrees of buckling. The maximum lift/drag ratios were similar for all the (quite different) shapes but the stall characteristics were found to be markedly different. Results are presented of cross-plane traverses detailing the wake vector field and turbulence characteristics for two of the planforms at conditions close to stall. A MAV, based on mylar-covered buckled CF struts, is described. The MAV utilises elevon control based on modified commercially available micro radio control systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1068: The UAV Special Issue , February 2003 , pp. 117 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smits, A.J. Challenges for innovation in aeronautics, topical review paper, 2001, 14th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Adelaide, 9-14 Dec 2001.Google Scholar
2. http://www.ukdf.org.uk/ts6.html. Google Scholar
3. Grasmeyer, J.M. and Keennon, M.T. Development of the Black Widow micro air vehicle, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper AIAA-2001-0127.Google Scholar
4. Ellington, C.P., Van Den Berg, C., Willmott, A.P. and Thomas, A.L.R. Leading edge vortices in insect flight, Nature, 1996, 384, pp 626–630.Google Scholar
5. http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ronf/MFI/papers.html. Google Scholar
6. http://www.idnet.de/homepage/scholl/Englisch/believe.htm. Google Scholar
7.Backpack drone peers beyond enemy lines, New Scientist, 21 October 2000. Also see; http://www.newscientist.com/ and http://www.space daily.com/news/uav-OOf.html. Google Scholar
8. http://www.ANSAproducts.com/. Google Scholar
9. Gere, J. and Timoshenko, S. Mechanics of Materials, PWS Publishers.Google Scholar
10. Houghton, E. and Carruthers, N. Aerodynamics for Engineering Students, 1982, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
11. Gadd, A. The Analysis of Noise Generation and Airflow in the Industrial Wind Tunnel, Honours Thesis, Dept Mech and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
12. Hooper, J.D. and Musgrove, A.R. Reynolds stress, mean velocity and dynamic static pressure measurement by a four-hole pressure probe, Exp Thermal and Fluid Sci, 1997, 15, (4), pp 375.Google Scholar
13. Watkins, S. and Saunders, J.W. A review of the wind conditions experienced by a moving vehicle, 1998, International Congress of the Society of Automotive Engineers America, Detroit, February 1998. Also in SP 1318 Developments in Vehicle Aerodynamics.Google Scholar
14. Watkins, S. Gusts and transients, invited chapter in Automobile Wind Noise and Its Measurement Part 2, SAE Special Publication.Google Scholar