Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:27:18.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Management of Cost Reduction-Method or Myth?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

H. Davies
H. Davies*
Affiliation:
Survey and Reliability, Reaction Motors Division, Thiokol Chemical Corporation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“When I use a word”, Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “it means what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” Lewis Carroll's words could hardly be more appropriate than to the expression “Cost Reduction” as used by the businessman. To some, cost reduction appears as a game played with imaginary money to earn “brownie points” to please a customer. To some in organised labour, the words are viewed in the same generic class as “sweat shop” and “scab”. To others, however, cost reduction seemingly implies a business discipline exercised in earnest and to be reflected in the company balance sheet. The question then, may well be asked, “What is cost reduction?“—“Is it possible to provide a meaningful management technique to motivate cost reduction activities and to measure the results?“

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 666 , June 1966 , pp. 639 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1. Preinreich, G. A. D. The Economic Life of Industrial Equipment. Econometrica, Vol. 8, p. 12, 1940.Google Scholar
2. Hogan, E. T. and Nadeau, R. L. Operational Concept of the Integrated Helicopter Avionics System. AIAA Jour. of Aircraft, Vol. 2, No. 6, p. 546, November-December 1965.Google Scholar
3. The Secretary of Defense. Dept of Defense Cost Reduction Program—Third Annual Progress Report, 12th July 1965.Google Scholar
4. Dyment, J. T. Tools of Airline Management. Journal Roy Aero Soc, p. 9, January 1965.Google Scholar
5.National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASAPERT and Companion Cost System, NPC 101, 30th October 1962.Google Scholar
6. Fondahl, John W. Methods for Extending the Range of Non-Computer Critical Path Applications, Stanford University, Dept of Civil Engineering Tech Report 47, November 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dept of the Navy, Special Projects Office. Polaris Management, February 1961.Google Scholar
8. Davies, H. Experience with Value Analysis as a Working Tool. Proc Inst Mech Eng (in press).Google Scholar
9. Jones, T. K. Redundancy/Maintenance Cost Optimization for Manned Orbital Space Stations. Trans 9th Sympon Ballistic Missiles and Space Technology, Vol. 1, p. 12, Aug 1964.Google Scholar
10. Winlund, E. S. Decision Tools for Cost Effective Design. AIAA Paper No. 65-391, AIAA Second Annual Meeting, San Francisco, Calif, 26th-29th July 1965.Google Scholar
11. Dantzig, G. B. Maximization of a Set of Linear Functions of Variables Subject to Linear Inequalities. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Koopmans, T. C. (ed) New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
12. Caywood, James A. Functional Organization for Engineering. Modern Railroads, p. 88, August 1965.Google Scholar
13. Melman, Seymour. Dynamic Factors in Industrial Productivity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1956.Google Scholar
14. Wright, T. P. Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes. Jour Aero Sci, Vol. 3, p. 122, February 1936.Google Scholar
15. Bowman, Edward H. and Fetter, Robert B. Analysis for Production Management. Homewood, 111, Richard I). Irwin, Inc, Rev ed, 1961.Google Scholar
16. Burns, Tom. Research, Development and Production: Problems of Conflict and Cooperation. Inst Rad Eng Trans on Engineering Management, Vol EM 8, No. 1, p. 15, March 1961.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Asher, Harold. Cost-Quantity Relationship in the Air-frame Industry. The RAND Corp, 1st July 1956.Google Scholar
Banks, F. R. The Importance of Time in Aircraft Manufacture. Journal Roy Aero Soc, Vol. 61, January 1957.Google Scholar
Bursk, Edward C. and Chapman, Iohn F. (Eds.). New Decision-Making Tools for Managers. Cambridge, Mass, Harv Univ Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Davies, O. L. (Ed.) The Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments. London, Oliver and Boyd, 1956.Google Scholar
Davies, O. L. (Ed.) Statistical Methods in Research and Production. London, Oliver and Boyd, 1961.Google Scholar
Falcon, WIlliam, D. (Ed.). Value Analysis, Value Engineering. The Implications for Managers, New York, American Management Assoc, 1964.Google Scholar
Grant, E. L. Principles of Engineering Economy. New York, Ronald Press Co, 1946.Google Scholar
Haber, Samuel. Efficiency and Uplift—Scientific Management in the Progressive Era 1890-1920, Chicago, Univ. Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. R. P. and Longton, P. A. Operational Research and Aviation Management (4 Parts). Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 69, August, September, October and November 1965.Google Scholar
Michael, Stephen R. Appraising Management Practices and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice Hall, Inc, 1964.Google Scholar
Miller, DAvid W. and Starr, Martin K. Executive Decisions and Operations Research. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice Hall, Inc. 1960.Google Scholar
Moroney, M. J. Facts From Figures. London, Penguin Books Ltd, 3rd Ed, 1956.Google Scholar
Novick, D. Weapon-System Cost Methodology. RM-287, The RAND Corp, 1st February 1956.Google Scholar
Urwick, L. and Brech, E. F. L. The Making of Scientific Management(3 Vols.). London, Management Publications Trust, 1946-1949.Google Scholar
Walsh, Francis J. Jr. Administration of Cost Reduction Programs. Business Policy Study No. 117, New York, National Industrial Conference Board, Inc. Google Scholar