Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:15:06.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of Skin Friction using a Rectangular Mouthed Preston Tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Alan Quarmby  and
H. K. Das
Alan Quarmby
Affiliation:
The University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology
H. K. Das
Affiliation:
The University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Measurements of skin friction were made with a set of rectangular mouthed pitot tubes of constant thickness ratio. The results gave a unique calibration between skin friction and pressure recorded by the tube when plotted after the method of Preston it the outside thickness is taken as the representative length. The calibration curve differs from that for circular Preston tubes when the effective centre of the pitot mouth lies within the sublayer.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 73 , Issue 699 , March 1969 , pp. 228 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Preston, J. H. The Determination of Turbulent Skin Friction by Means of Pitot Tubes. JRAeS, Vol 58, p 109, February 1954.Google Scholar
2. Quarmby, A. On the Use of the Preston Tube in Concentric Annuli, JRAeS, Vol 71, p 47, January 1967.Google Scholar
3. Patel, V. C. Calibration of the Preston Tube and Limita tions on its Use in Pressure Gradients, J Fluid Mech, Vol 23, p 185, 1965.Google Scholar
4. Macmillan, F. A. Experiments on Pitot Tubes in Shear Flow, ARC R and M No 3028,1957.Google Scholar
5. Young, A. D. and Maas, J. N. The Behaviour of a Pitot Tube in a Transverse Total Pressure Gradient, ARC R and M No 1770, 1937.Google Scholar