Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:30:38.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pilot modelling techniques for the analysis of aircraft linear dynamic behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Innocenti  and
R. L. Minciotti
M. Innocenti
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospce Engineering, Auburn University, Alabama, USA
R. L. Minciotti
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evaluation of aircraft flying qualities has always required a high level of integration between airplane dynamic response and human operator properties. Today, the linear pilot-aircraft behaviour is a mature technology summarised by the publication of the military specifications MIL-STD-1797.

The present paper outlines the contribution of pilot modelling techniques to such endeavour and their use as a tool in the prediction of aircraft handling qualities characteristics by verifying their output in a Neal-Smith criterion framework. The objective is to complete the understanding of handling qualities in the linear part of the flight envelope (such as tracking) and to initiate work in the large amplitude manoeuvres. The results have produced an interactive computer aided software useful for pilot-in-the-loop analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 94 , Issue 935 , May 1990 , pp. 153 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McRuer, D. T. and Krendel, E. S. Dynamic Response of Human Operators, WADC TR–65–524, October 1957.Google Scholar
2. McRuer, D. T., Krendel, E. S., Graham, D. and Reisener, W. Jr Human Pilot Dynamics in Compensatory System: Theory, Models and Experiments With Controlled Element and Forcing Function Variations. AFFDL-TR–65–15, July 1965.Google Scholar
3. McRuer, D. T. and Krendel, E. S. Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior, AGARD-AG–188, January 1974.Google Scholar
4. Hess, R. A. A Dual-Loop Model of the Human Controller in Single-Axis Tracking Tasks. NASA TM–73, 249, May 1977.Google Scholar
5. Hess, R. A. Structural model of the adaptive human pilot, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, September-October 1980, 3, pp 416–423.Google Scholar
6. Hess, R. A. Effects of Time Delays on Systems Subject to Manual Control. AIAA Paper 83–1523, July 1983.Google Scholar
7. Kleinman, D. L., Baron, S. and Levison, W. H. An optimal control model of human response, Part I: Theory and validation, Automatica, 1969, 6, pp 357–369.Google Scholar
8. Kleinman, D. L., Baron, S. and Levison, W. H. An optimal control model of human response, Part II: Prediction of human performance in a complex task, Ibid, pp 371–382.Google Scholar
9. Curry, R. W., Hoffman, W. C. and Young, L. R. Pilot Modeling for Manned Simulation, AFFDL-TR–76–124, Vol I, December 1976.Google Scholar
10. Baron, S. and Levison, W. H. The Optimal control model: status and future directions, Cambridge, Mass, 1980.Google Scholar
11. Thompson, P.M. Program CC’s Implementation of the Human Optimal Control Model, STI Paper No 411, California, 1987.Google Scholar
12. Cooper, G. E. and Harper, R. P. Jr The Use of Pilot Rating in the Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities, NASA TN D–5153, 1969.Google Scholar
13. Military Specifications — Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes. MIL-F–8785B, 1970.Google Scholar
14. Neal, T. P. and Smith, R. E. An In-Flight Investigation to Develop Control System Design Criteria for Fighter Airplanes, Vols. I and II, AFFDL-TR–70–74, 1970.Google Scholar
15. Hess, R. A. Prediction of pilot opinion ratings using an optimal pilot model, Human Factors, 19, (5), pp 459–475.Google Scholar
16. Military Specifications — Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, MIL-F–8785C, November 1980.Google Scholar
17. Moorhouse, D. J. and Woodcock, R. J. Present Status of Flying Qualities Criteria for Conventional Aircraft, AFWAL-TW–81, June 1981.Google Scholar
18. Hodgkinson, J. Equivalent System Criteria for Handling Qualities of Military Aircraft, AFWAL-TR–85, June 1981.Google Scholar
19. Hol, R. H. and Hodgkinson, J. Bandwidth — a Criterion for Highly Augmented Airplanes, AFWAL-TR–87, June 1981.Google Scholar
20. Bacon, B. J. A Modern Approach to Pilot/Vehicle Analysis and the Neal-Smith Criteria, Purdue Thesis, December 1982.Google Scholar
21. Hess, R. A. Investigating Aircraft Handling Qualities Using a Structural Model of the Human Pilot, AIAA Paper No 87–2537, August 1987.Google Scholar
22. Minciotti, R. L. Modellizzazione del Pilota Umano per l’Analisi delle Qualità di Volo, University of Pisa Thesis, December 1987.Google Scholar