Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:42:41.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The smart morphing winglet driven by the piezoelectric Macro Fiber Composite actuator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2022

X. Chen Open the ORCID record for X. Chen [Opens in a new window] ,
J. Liu  and
Q. Li Open the ORCID record for Q. Li [Opens in a new window]
X. Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
J. Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Q. Li*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: qunli@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A smart morphing winglet driven by piezoelectric Macro Fiber Composite (MFC) is designed to adjust cant angle autonomously for various flight conditions. The smart morphing winglet is composed of the MFC actuator, DC-DC converter, power supply, winglet part and wing part. A hinge is designed to transfer the bending deformation of intelligent MFC bending actuator to rotation of the winglet structure so as to achieve the adaptive cant angle. Experimental and numerical work are conducted to evaluate the performance of smart morphing winglet. It is demonstrated that the proposed intelligent MFC bending actuator has an excellent bending performance and load resistance. This smart morphing winglet exhibits the excellent characteristic of flexibility on large deformation and lightweight. Moreover, a series of wind tunnel tests are performed, which demonstrate that the winglet driven by intelligent MFC bending actuator produces sufficient deformation in various wind speed. At high wind speed, the cant angle of the winglet can reach 16 degrees, which is still considered to be very useful for improving the aerodynamic performance of the aircraft. The aerodynamic characteristics are investigated by wind tunnel tests with various attack angles. As a result, when the morphing winglet is actuated, the lift-to-drag ratio could vary up to 11.9% and 6.4%, respectively, under wind speeds of 5.4 and 8.5m/s. Meanwhile, different flight phases such as take-off, cruise and landing are considered to improve aerodynamic performance by adjusting the cant angle of winglet. The smart morphing winglet varies the aerofoil autonomously by controlling the low winglet device input voltage to remain optimal aerodynamic performance during the flight process. It demonstrates the feasibility of piezoelectric composites driving intelligent aircraft.

Keywords

Smart morphing wingletsPiezoelectric MFCIntelligent MFC bending actuatorFinite element model
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 126 , Issue 1299 , May 2022 , pp. 830 - 847
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Li, D., Zhao, S., Ronch, A.D., Xiang, J., Drofelnik, J., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, Y., Kintscher, M. and Monner, H.P. A review of modelling and analysis of morphing wings, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2018, 100, pp 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, J.C. and Garcia, E. Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles, Smart Mater. Struct., 2011, 20, (10), p 103001.Google Scholar
Jinsong, L. Jian, S. and Yanju, L. Application status and future prospect of smart materials and structures in morphing aircraft, Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35, (1), pp 29–45.Google Scholar
Yousefikoma, A. Applications of smart structures to aircraft for performance enhancement, Canad. Aeronaut. Space J., 2003, 49, (4), pp 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Hui, Z., Liu, Y. and Chen, G. Morphing control of a new bionic morphing aircraft with deep reinforcement learning, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2019, 92, (10), pp 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajarian, A., Zakerzadeh, M.R. and Baghani, M. Design, analysis and testing of a smart morphing airfoil actuated by SMA wires, Smart Mater. Struct., 2019, 28, p 115043.Google Scholar
Guerrero, J.E., Maestro, D. and Bottaro, A. Biomimetic spiroid winglets for lift and drag control, Comptes rendus - Mécanique, 2012, 340, (1-2), pp 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, V.M., Shah, D.A. and Boomadevi, P. Preliminary investigation on the effects of folding wingtips on the aerodynamics characteristics of flexible aircraft, Int. J. Ambient Energy, 2019, 01430750, pp 1–18.Google Scholar
Ostovan, Y., Akpolat, M.T. and Uzol, O. Experimental investigation of the effects of winglets on the tip vortex behavior of a model horizontal axis wind turbine using particle image velocimetry, Sol. Energy Eng., 2019, 141, (1), 011006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Khodaparast, H.H. and Friswell, M.I. Conceptual study of a morphing winglet based on unsymmetrical stiffness, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2016, 58, (13), pp 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, R., Magnifico, M., Amoroso, F. and Monaco, E. Multi-parametric flutter analysis of a morphing wing trailing edge, Aeronaut. J. New Ser., 2014, 118, (1207), pp 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eguea, J.P., Silva, G.P.G.D. and Catalano, F.M. Fuel efficiency improvement on a business jet using a camber morphing winglet concept, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2020, 96, p 105542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noviello, M.C., Dimino, I., Concilio, A., Amoroso, F. and Pecora, R. Aeroelastic assessments and functional hazard analysis of a regional aircraft equipped with morphing winglets, Aerospace, 2019, 6, (104), 6100104, pp 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Khodaparast, H.H. and Friswell, M.I. Conceptual study of a morphing winglet based on unsymmetrical stiffness, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, 58, pp 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, P., Gatto, A. and Friswell, M.I. Aircraft control via variable cant-angle winglets, J. Aircr., 2008, 45, (2), pp 414–423.Google Scholar
Arena, M., Concilio, A. and Pecora, R. Aero-servo-elastic design of a morphing wing trailing edge system for enhanced cruise performance, Aerospace Sci. Technol., 2019, 86, pp 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimino, I., Gallorini, F., Palmieri, M. and Pispola, G. Electromechanical actuation for morphing winglets, Actuators, 2019, 8, (42), 18020042, pp 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Breuker, R., Abdalla, M. and Gürdal, Z. Design of morphing winglets with the inclusion of nonlinear aeroelastic effects, Aeronaut. J., 2011, 115, (1174), pp 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, L.W., Wu, Z.-H. and Xu, Z.-W. Identification research of the piezoelectric smart structure system of aircraft wing based on ARX model, Piezoelectrics Acoustooptics, 2008, 30, (6), pp 760–762.Google Scholar
Leylek, E., Manzo, J. and Garcia, E. A bat-wing aircraft using the smart joint mechanism, Adv. Sci. Technol., 2009, 58, (58), pp 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Sun, J., Liu, Y. and Leng, J. Experiment and analysis of fluidic flexible matrix composite (F2MC) tube, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2012, 23, (3), pp 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Sun, J., Liu, Y. and Leng, J. Variable stiffness property study on shape memory polymer composite tube, Smart Mater. Struct., 2012, 21, (9), 094021, pp 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Yin, W., Liu, Y. and Leng, J. Structural design and analysis of morphing skin embedded with pneumatic muscle fibers, Smart Mater. Struct., 2011, 20, (8), 085033, pp 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudenko, A., Hanning, A., Monner, H.P. and Horst, P. Extremely deformation morphing leading edge: optimization, design and structure testing, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2018, 29, (5), pp 764–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, Q., Weaver, P.M. and Azarpeyvand, M. Design and mechanical testing of a variable stiffness morphing trailing edge flap, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2018, 29, (4), pp 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanalian, M., Quintana, A. and Abdelkefi, A. Morphing and growing Macro unmanned air vehicle: Sizing process and stability, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, 78, pp 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D., Liu, Q., Wu, Y. and Xiang, J. Design and analysis of a morphing drag rudder on the aerodynamics, structural deformation, and the required actuating moment, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2018, 29, (6), pp 1038–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.F. A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures, Compos. Struct., 2010, 92, (12), pp 2793–2810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, A.K. and Kudva, J.N. Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2004, pp 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgen, O., Butt, L.M., Day, S.R., Sossi, C.A., Weaver, J.P., Wolek, A., Meason, W.H. and Inman, D.J. A novel unmanned aircraft with solid-state control surfaces: Analysis and flight demonstration, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2013, 24, (2), pp 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, M.-W., Rodrigue, H., Kim, H., Song, S.-H. and Ahn, S.-H. Shape memory alloy/glass fiber woven composite for soft morphing winglets of unmanned aerial vehicles, Compos. Struct., 2016, 140, pp 202–212.Google Scholar
Giurgiutiu, V. Review of smart-materials actuation solutions for aeroelastic and vibration control, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2000, 11, (7), pp 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onur, B. and Michael, I.F. Piezoceramic composite actuators for a solid-state variable-camber wing, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2014, 25, (7), pp 806–817.Google Scholar
Syaifuddin, M., Park, H.C. and Goo, N.S. Design and evaluation of LIPCA-actuated flapping device, J. Korean Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci., 2005, 15, pp 1225–1230.Google Scholar
Sun, X., Dai, Q. and Bilgen, O. Design and simulation of Macro-Fiber composite based serrated Macro flap for wind turbine blade fatigue load reduction, Mater. Res. Express, 2018, 5, (5), 055505, pp 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadan, K.S., Sameoto, D. and Evoy, S. A review of piezoelectric polymers as functional materials for electromechanical transducers, Smart Mater. Struct., 2014, 23, (3), pp 33001–33026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, H.C. and Lefebvre, S. Piezoelectric actuator models for active sound and vibration control of cylinders, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 1993, 4, (3), pp 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzen, J.J., Jeng, S.L. and Chieng, W.H. Modeling of piezoelectric actuator for compensation and controller design, Precis. Eng., 2003, 27, (1), pp 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, N.T. and Truong, T.Q. A fully polymeric Macropump with piezoelectric actuator, Sens. Actuators B, 2004, 97, (1), pp 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djahid, G. and Sergey, P. Winglet geometry impact on DLR-F4 aerodynamics and an analysis of a hyperbolic winglet concept, Aerospace, 2017, 4, (4), p 60.Google Scholar
Guerrero, J., Sanguineti, M. and Wittkowski, K. CFD study of the impact of variable cant angle winglets on total drag reduction, Aerospace, 2018, 5, (4), 5040126, pp 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, J.E., Sanguineti, M. and Wittkowski, K. Variable cant angle winglets for improvement of aircraft flight performance, Meccanica, 2020, 55, (1), pp 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar