Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:26:21.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolving nonuniform flow in gas turbines: challenges, progress, and moving forward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2024

F. Lou*
Affiliation:
Institute for Aero Engine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

The flow in gas turbines exhibits a highly unsteady, complex and nonuniform manner, which presents two main challenges. Firstly, it introduces instrumentation errors, contributing to uncertainties when calculating one-dimensional performance metrics during rig or engine tests using fixed-location rakes. Secondly, it raises mechanical concerns, including high-cycle fatigue due to blade row interactions in turbomachines and thermal fatigue caused by hot-streaks at the combustor exit. Experimental characterisation of the flow nonuniformity in gas turbines is highly challenging due to the confined space and harsh environment for instrumentation. This paper presents recent efforts to address this issue by resolving the nonuniform flow in gas turbines using spatially under-sampled measurements. The proposed approach utilises discrete probe data and leverages a ‘Fourier-based approximation’ method developed by the author. The technique has undergone preliminary experimental validation involving reconstruction of the total pressure distribution in a multi-stage axial compressor and the total temperature field at the exit of the combustor and high-pressure turbine. Results show that, in the multi-stage axial compressor environment, reconstruction of inter-stage total pressure is achieved using a reduced dataset covering less than 20% of the annulus with reasonably good accuracy. The reconstructed total pressure yields almost identical mean total pressure values at all spanwise locations, with a maximum deviation of less than 0.02%. Additionally, reconstruction of the total temperature distribution at an engine-representative full annulus combustor is achieved using measurements at ten carefully selected circumferential locations. Results show that the reconstructed temperature field successfully captures the primary features associated with combustor exit temperature flow. The reconstructed temperature field yields excellent agreement in the magnitude of radial temperature distribution factor (RTDF) and overall temperature distribution factor (OTDF) predictions to the experiment, with a deviation of less than 0.5% for RTDF and less than 2.5% for OTDF. Lastly, reconstruction of the total temperature distribution at the exit of the GE E3 high-pressure turbine (HPT) is achieved using measurements at eight carefully selected circumferential locations. Results demonstrate remarkable robustness in resolving the temperature profile at the HPT exit with high fidelity, irrespective of the HPT inlet conditions. The initial validation results are promising, demonstrating that the new probe layout scheme and the Fourier-based approximation method enable effective characterisation of flow nonuniformity in gas turbines, thereby providing valuable insights into the complex flow of gas turbine engines.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sadrehaghighi, I. An example reference, 2023. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13712.12801/4, p 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migliorini, M., Zachos, P.K., MacManus, D.G. and Haladuda, P. S-duct flow distortion with non-uniform inlet conditions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerospace Eng., 2023, 237, (2), pp 357373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheoran, Y., Bouldin, B. and Krishnan, P.M. Compressor performance and operability in swirl distortion, in Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 44021, 2010, pp 24532464.Google Scholar
Chilla, M., Pullan, G. and Gallimore, S. Reducing instrumentation errors caused by circumferential flow-field variations in multistage axial compressors, J. Turbomach., 2020, 142, (9), p 091006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormanik, N.J., Matthews, D.R., Key, N.L. and King, A.J. Purdue 3-stage axial compressor research facility: Through the years, to infinity, and beyond, AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum, 2019, p 4000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, F., Matthews, D.R., Kormanik, N.J. III and Key, N.L. Accounting for circumferential flow nonuniformity in a multistage axial compressor, J. Turbomach., 2023, 145, (7), p 071016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povey, T., Chana, K.S., Jones, T.V. and Hurrion, J. The effect of hot-streaks on HP vane surface and endwall heat transfer: An experimental and numerical study, J. Turbomach., 2007, 129, (1), pp 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povey, T. and Qureshi, I. Developments in hot-streak simulators for turbine testing, J. Turbomach., 2009, 131, (3), p 031009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, S.G., Abuaf, N., Lovett, J.A. and Lee, C.P. Measurements of combustor velocity and turbulence profiles, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 78903, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1993, p V03AT15A079.Google Scholar
Barringer, M.D., Thole, K.A. and Polanka, M.D. Experimental evaluation of an inlet profile generator for high-pressure turbine tests. J. Turbomach., 2007, 129, (2), pp 382393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, F. Approximating gas turbine combustor exit temperature distribution factors using spatially under-sampled measurements, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2022, 144, (10), p 101018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., Zhou, K., Zheng, X. and Lou, F. Lessons learned toward estimating the high-pressure turbine inlet temperature profile using measurements acquired at the high-pressure turbine exit, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2023, 145, (7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamczuk, R.R. and Seume, J.R. Time resolved full-annulus computations of a turbine with inhomogeneous inlet conditions, Int. J. Gas Turbine Propul. Power Syst., 2012, 4, (2), pp 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Z., Liu, H., Zang, S., Pan, C. and Zhang, M. Full-annulus URANS study of inlet hot-streak transportation in a four-stage gas turbine, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 50992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018,V02AT45A011.Google Scholar
Stoll, F., Tremback, J.W. and Arnaiz, H.H. Effect of number of probes and their orientation on the calculation of several compressor face distortion descriptors (No. NASA-TM-72859), 1979.Google Scholar
Cumpsty, N. and Horlock, J.H. Averaging nonuniform flow for a purpose, J. Turbomach., 2006, 128, (1), pp 120129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L., Chen, T., Wells, R.G., Li, Y.S. and Ning, W. Analysis of rotor-rotor and stator-stator interferences in multi-stage turbomachines, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 3610, 2002, pp 287298.Google Scholar
Methel, J., Smith, N.R., Berdanier, R.A. and Key, N.L. Effects of circumferential nonuniformity in compressor flow fields including vane wake variability, J. Propul. Power, 2018, 34, (4), pp 10801089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besem, F.M., Kielb, R.E., Galpin, P., Zori, L. and Key, N.L. Mistuned forced response predictions of an embedded rotor in a multistage compressor, J. Turbomach., 2016, 138, (6), p 061003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Aye-Addo, N., Kielb, R. and Key, N. Mistuned higher-order mode forced response of an embedded compressor rotor—part II: Mistuned forced response prediction, J. Turbomach., 2018, 140, (3), p 031006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenenborn, H. Analysis of the effect of multirow and multipassage aerodynamic interaction on the forced response variation in a compressor configuration—Part I: Aerodynamic excitation, J. Turbomach., 2018, 140, (5), p 051004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilla, M., Pullan, G. and Thorne, G. Sensitivity of multi-stage compressor performance assessment to measurement rake positions, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 84065, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020, p V02AT32A019.Google Scholar
Seshadri, P., Simpson, D., Thorne, G., Duncan, A. and Parks, G. Spatial flow-field approximation using few thermodynamic measurements—Part I: Formulation and area averaging, J. Turbomach., 2020, 142, (2), p 021006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seshadri, P., Duncan, A., Simpson, D., Thorne, G. and Parks, G. Spatial flow-field approximation using few thermodynamic measurements—Part II: Uncertainty assessments. J. Turbomach., 2020, 142, (2), p 021007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seshadri, P., Duncan, A.B., Thorne, G., Parks, G., Diaz, R.V. and Girolami, M. Bayesian assessments of aeroengine performance with transfer learning, Data-Centric Eng., 2022, 3, e29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, G.G., Babin, C., Ottavy, X. and Fontaneto, F. Bayesian inference of experimental data for axial compressor performance assessment, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, vol. 84904, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021, p. V02AT31A029.Google Scholar
Cruz, G.G., Babin, C., Ottavy, X. and Fontaneto, F. A Bayesian data driven multi-fidelity modelling approach for experimental under-sampled flow reconstruction, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, F. and Key, N.L. Reconstructing compressor non-uniform circumferential flow field from spatially undersampled data—Part 1: Methodology and sensitivity analysis, J. Turbomach., 2021, 143, (8), p 081002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, F., Matthews, D.R., Kormanik, N.J.K. and Key, N.L. Reconstructing compressor nonuniform circumferential flow field from spatially undersampled data – Part 2: Practical application for experiments, J. Turbomach., 2021, 143, (8), p 081003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormanik, N.J. III Characterization of aerodynamic forcing functions for embedded rotor resonant response in a multistage compressor, MS thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2017.Google Scholar