Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:31:26.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of the Exit Velocity Profile on the Noise of a Jet*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

Alan Powell*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

The noise levels of a jet issuing from a long pipe are compared with those of a jet having a square velocity profile at the exit. A subsonic noise reduction of between 2 and 5 decibels for various conditions is found for the case of the flow emerging with an approximately “turbulent pipe-flow” velocity profile for the same maximum jet velocity, but this is at the expense of a loss in thrust of a quarter. On comparison with a jet of smaller diameter which has an equal thrust for the same maximum jet velocity, it is found that the changes in noise level are rather smaller. For jets of equal diameters, the effects on the subsonic aerodynamic noise generated of a reduction of velocity gradient near the boundary are more than offset by the increased velocities necessary near the centre of the jet to obtain equal thrust. It is concluded that if the effect of differences in initial turbulence can be neglected the use of an auxiliary flow forming a comparatively thin sheath of slower moving fluid at the exit is not likely to result in large decreases in the subsonic noise level, and that a general reduction in jet velocity is more effective.

Above the critical pressure larger reductions of up to 10 decibels are found. These are consistent with a delay of the onset of the self-maintained shock-produced noise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Based on a former paper “ An Examination of the Influence of the Exit Velocity Profile of a Two-inch Diameter Jet,” A.R.C. 15,473, July 1952, revised and extended.

References

1. Lighthill, M. J. (1952). On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. Proc. Roy. Soc. A.211, p. 564, 1952.Google Scholar
2. Powell, A. (1953). On the Noise Emanating from a Two-dimensional Jet above the Critical Pressure. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. IV, Part II. February 1953.Google Scholar
3. Powell, A. (1953). On the Mechanism of Choked Jet Noise. Proc. Phys. Soc. B. 66, p. 1039, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Powell, A. (1953). On Edge Tones and Associated Phenomena. Acustica, Vol. 3, p. 233, 1953.Google Scholar
5. Richards, E. J. (1953). Research Work on the Aerodynamic Noise from Jets and Asso ciated Problems. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, May 1953.Google Scholar
6. Westley, R. and Lilley, G. M. (1950). An investigation of the Noise Field from a Small Jet and Methods for its Reduction. College of Aeronautics Report No. 53, 1952.Google Scholar
7. Harrop, R. (1951). Method for Designing Wind Tunnel Contractions. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 55, p 169, March 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Goldstein, S. (Ed.) (1938). Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. O.U.P., 1st Edition, 1938.Google Scholar
9. Taylor, G. I. (1948). Pitot Pressures in Moist Air. R. & M. 2248, 1948.Google Scholar
10. Young, A. D. and Maas, J. N. (1937). The Behaviour of a Pitot Tube in a Transverse Total-pressure Gradient. R. & M. 1770, 1937.Google Scholar
11. Lassiter, W. and Hubbard, H. H. (1952). Experimental Studies of Noise from Subsonic Jets in Still Air. N.A.C.A., T.N. 2757, August 1952.Google Scholar
12. Powell, A. (1954). A Survey of Experiments on Jet Noise. Aircraft Engineering, January 1954.Google Scholar