Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:42:18.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Class of Laminar Viscous Flows Within One or Two Bounding Cones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

A. J. A. Morgan
A. J. A. Morgan*
Affiliation:
Aeronautical Engineering Research Inc., Pasadena
Get access

Extract

The class of incompressible axially-symmetric laminar viscous flows considered are exact invariant (similarity) solutions of the Navier- Stokes equations. The functional forms of the velocity components are deduced by group-theoretic arguments. The system of governing partial differential equations is reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations and these in turn are reduced to a single first order non-linear ordinary differential equation for the dimensionless tangential velocity component. The general solution of this equation is obtained in terms of hypergeometric functions.

The classes of laminar viscous flows bounded by a right conical surface or by right inner and outer conical surfaces with a common apex obtainable from the previously mentioned (similar) solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation are studied. Suction/injection velocities (inversely proportional to the distance from the apex) normal/parallel to the conical boundaries are admissible for the classes of flows considered. If the flow is bounded by impermeable conical surfaces, then it is shown that these solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation imply that it must be identically quiescent.

When the bounding cones are not impermeable, closed solutions for the single-cone case are found in terms of elementary functions. A numerical example of such a flow, with fluid injected normal to the conical boundary, is given. Such a simplification of the hypergeometric functions entering into the problem, however, cannot be achieved in the two-cone case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1956 , pp. 225 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yatseyev, V. I. On a Class of Exact Solutions of the Equations of Motion of a Viscous Fluid. Translated from: Zhurnal Eksperimental ‘noi i Theoretischeskoi Fiziki, Vol. 20. No. 11, 1950, as N.A.C.A. T.M. 1349, 1953.Google Scholar
2. Squire, H. B. The Round Laminar Jet. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Vol. IV, Pt. 3, pp. 321–329, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Morgan, A. J. A. The Reduction by One of the Number of Independent Variables in Some Systems of Partial Differential Equations. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, New Series, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 250–259, 1952.Google Scholar
4. Landau, L. and Lifshits, E. Mechanics of Dense Media, G.T.T.I. (State Publishing House for Technical and Theoretical Literature), Moscow-Leningrad, Section 19, p. 77, 1944.Google Scholar
5. Squire, H. B. Some Viscous Fluid Flow Problems. I. Jet Emerging from a Hole in a Plane Wall. Phil. Mag., Vol. 43, pp. 942–945, 1952.Google Scholar
6. Slezkin, N. A. On the Motion of a Viscous Fluid Between Two Cones. Scientific Papers of the Moscow State University (Uch. Zap. M.G.U)., No. 2, pp. 83–87, 1934.Google Scholar
7. Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F. and Tricomi, F. G. Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. I, Bateman Manuscript Project, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 56, 1953.Google Scholar
8. Kamke, E. Differentialgleichungen Lösungsmethoden und Lösungen. Vol. I: Gewöliche Differentialgleichungen, Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, Equation (2.148), p. 435, 1948.Google Scholar
9. Jeffery, G. B. Steady Motion of a Viscous Fluid. Phil. Mag., Series 6, Vol. 29, p. 455, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hamel, G. Spiralförmige Bewegungen zaher Flüssigkeiten, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, Vol. 25, p. 34, 1916.Google Scholar