Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:34:28.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seen From Below: Conceptions of Politics and the State in a Botswana Village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Jo Helle-Valle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on the contentions that rules cannot determine practice, and that the state is only a composite reality that needs to be analysed as a part of a wider socio-cultural totality, this article investigates how the state, as government and political practice, functions in a village in Botswana. Consequently, lay villagers' attitudes to the state and hence the issue of legitimacy become focal points in the discussion. It is argued that what is conceptualised by most villagers as the state is not co-extensive with its formal boundaries. Rather, it is associated with that which is ‘modern’ or ‘European’ and hence seen to be alien. This means not that the state is conceptualised in merely negative terms but rather that it achieves its legitimacy less on ideological grounds than from its role as a generous patron. This is due to the state's extraordinary wealth. It is argued that this form of legitimacy to some extent defines the roles it can play and makes it in some ways vulnerable but, on the other hand, enables the state to buy time to develop a political and administrative system that steers it clear of the common miseries that most other African states face.

Résumé

Cet article, qui se base sur les assertions selon lesquelles la règle ne peut determiner la pratique et l'Etat n'est qu'une réalité composite qu'il convient d'analyser dans une globalité socioculturelle plus large, étudie le mode de fonctionnement de l'Etat, en tant que pratique gouvemementale et politique, dans un village du Botswana. La discussion est ainsi centrée sur le comportement des villageois profanes à l'égard de l'Etat et done sur la question de la légitimité. Elle affirme que ce que la plupart des villageois conceptualisent comme Etat n'est pas co-extensionnel à ses limites formelles. Au lieu de cela, ils l'associent à ce qui est “moderne” ou “européen” et done considéré comme “étranger”. Ceci signifie non pas que l'Etat est conceptualise en termes purement négatifs, mais qu'il obtient sa légitimité non pas pour des raisons d'ordre idéologique mais essentiellement pour son rôle de bienfaiteur généreux. Ceci est dû à l'extraordinaire richesse de l'Etat. L'article affirme que cette forme de légitimité dans une certaine mesure définit les rôles qu'il peut jouer et le rend à certains égards vulnérable mais, d'un autre côté, permet à l'Etat de gagner du temps pour mettre en place un système politique et administratif lui permettant d'éviter les grandes difficultés auxquelles sont confrontés la plupart des Etats africains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , May 2002 , pp. 179 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appadurai, A. 1995. ‘The production of locality’, in , R.Fardon, (ed.), Counterworks: managing the diversity of knowledge pp. 204–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1981. ‘Descent and marriage reconsidered’, in , F.Barth, Process and Form in Social Life: selected essays of Fredrik Barth I, pp. 138–56. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bayart, J-F. 1986. ‘Civil society in Africa’, in , P.Chabal, (ed.), Political Domination in Africa: reflections on the limits of power pp. 109–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. 1976. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 1991. ‘Language, anthropology and cognitive science’, Man 26, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1963. ‘The attitude of the Algerian peasant towards time’, in , J.Pitt-Rivers, (ed.), Mediterranean Countrymen: essays in the social anthropology of the Mediterranean pp. 55-72. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chabal, P. and Daloz, , J-P. 1999. Africa Works: disorder as political instrument. Oxford: James Currey in association with the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. 1985. Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: the culture and history of a South African people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, , J. L. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, colonialism, and consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, , J. L. 1997. ‘Postcolonial politics and discourses of democracy in southern Africa: an anthropological reflection on African political modernities’, Journal of Anthropological Research 53, 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CSO (Central Statistical Office, Government of Botswana) 1995. Household Income and Expenditure Survey, 1993/94. Gaborone: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. ‘Govemmentality’, Ideology and Consciousness 6, 5–21.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-77 ed. , C.Gordon, . New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. ‘Of other spaces’, Diacritics 16, 22-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulbrandsen, ø. 1993. ‘The rise of the north-western Tswana kingdoms: on the dynamics of interaction between internal relations and external forces’, Africa 63 (4), 550–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulbrandsen, ø. 1995. ‘The king is king by the grace of the people: the exercise and control of power in subject-ruler relations’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, 415-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984. ‘What does a legitimation crisis mean today? Legitimation problems in late capitalism’, in , W.Connolly, (ed.), Legitimacy and the State pp. 134–55. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Helle-Valle, J. 1997. Change and Diversity in a Kgalagadi Village, Botswana. Oslo: SUM Dissertations and Theses.Google Scholar
Helle-Valle, J. 1999. ‘Sexual mores, promiscuity and “prostitution” in Botswana’, Ethnos 64, 372–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, G. 1987. ‘Ethnicity and state coherence in Africa’, Development 1, 82-6.Google Scholar
Karlström, M. 1996. ‘Imagining democracy: political culture and democratisation in Buganda’, Africa bb (4), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlström, M. 1999. ‘Civil society and its presuppositions: lessons from Uganda’, in , J. and , J. L.Comaroff, (eds), Civil Society and the Political Imagination in Africa: critical perspectives pp. 104-23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. 1988. African Capitalism: the struggle for ascendancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1970. Kalahari Village Politics: an African democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1987. ‘Kgalagari marriage’, in , A.Kuper, (ed.), South Africa and the Anthropologist pp. 57-70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, R. 1972, ‘Political clientelism and ethnicity in tropical Africa: competing solidarities in nation-building’, American Political Science Review 66, 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, J. (ed.). 1991. Rethinking Third World Politics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
MFDP (Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, Government of Botswana)., 1991. National Development Plan 7, 1991–97. Gaborone: Government Printer.Google Scholar
MFDP (Ministry of Finance and Development Planning, Government of Botswana)., 1997. Study of Poverty Alleviation in Botswana (Phase One) II. Gaborone: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Mgadla, P. T. and Campbell, , A. C. 1989. ‘Dikgotla, dikgosi and the protectorate administration’, in , J.Holm, and , P.Molutsi, (eds), Democracy in Botswana pp. 48–57. Gaborone: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Molokomme, A. 1991. Children of the Fence: the maintenance of extra-marital children under law and practice in Botswana. Research Report 1991/46. Leiden: African Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian Drama: an inquiry into the poverty of nations. London: Allen Lane the Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Okihiro, G. Y. 1976. ‘Hunters, Herders, Cultivators and Traders: interaction and change in the Kgalgadi, nineteenth century’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P.Weir, , L. and , Shearing, C. 1997. ‘Governmentality, criticism, polities’, Economy and Society 26, 501–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owusu, M. 1997. ‘Domesticating democracy: culture, civil society, and constitutionalism in Africa’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 39, 120–52.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rodman, M. 1992. ‘Empowering place: multilocality and multivocality’, American Anthropologist 94, 640–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothchild, D. and Chazan, , N. (eds). 1988. The Precarious Balance: state and society in Africa. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1974. Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Schaar, J. H. 1984. ‘Legitimacy in the modern state’, in , W.Connolly, (ed.), Legitimacy and the State pp. 104–33. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1994 (1938). A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. Hamburg: Lit Verlag for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Seepapitso, K. 1989. ‘The Kgotla and the freedom square: one-way or two-way communication?’ in , J.Holm, and , P.Molutsi, (eds), Democracy in Botswana pp. 212–15. Gaborone: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shanin, T. (ed.). 1971. Peasants and Peasant Societies Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Shore, C and Wright, , S. 1997. ‘Policy: a new field of anthropology’, in , C.Shore, and , S.Wright, (eds), Anthropology of Policy: critical perspectives on governance and power pp. 3–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Somolekae, G. 1989. ‘Do Batswana think and act as democrats?’ in , J.Holm, and , P.Molutsi, (eds), Democracy in Botswana pp. 75–86. Gaborone: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strauss, C and Quinn, , N. 1997. A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1967. ‘Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism’, Past and Present 38, 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tordoff, W. 1989. ‘Democracy in Botswana: an external assessment’, in , J.Holm, and , P.Molutsi, (eds), Democracy in Botswana pp. 280–7. Gaborone: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1968. Economy and Society: an outline of interpretive sociology ed. , G.Roth, and , C.Wittich, New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1984. ‘Legitimacy, politics and the state’, in , W.Connolly, (ed.), Legitimacy and the State pp. 32–62. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weimer, B. 1989. ‘Democracy in Botswana: an outsider's view’, in , J.Holm, and , P.Molutsi, (eds), Democracy in Botswana pp. 289–93. Gaborone: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1979. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Young, C. 1988. ‘The African colonial state and its political legacy’, in , D.Rothchild, and , N.Chazan, (eds), The Precarious Balance: state and society in Africa pp. 25–65. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar