Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:44:02.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Kinship and Credit among the Nuer’ (Africa, October 1971, pp. 306–19). A Comment by J. Y. Okamura, with Rejoinder by Maurice Glickman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2012

J. Y. Okamura  and
Maurice Glickman
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Information
Africa , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 338 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1972

References

REFERENCES

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1935. ‘The Nuer: Tribe and Clan (Sections VII-IX)’, Sudan Notes and Records, xviii. 37–87.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1937. ‘Economic Life of the Nuer (Part 1)’, S.N.R. xx. 207–45.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1951. Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. 1969. Kinship and the Social Order. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glickman, M. 1971. ‘Kinship and Credit among the Nuer’, Africa, xli. 306–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1955. Custom and Conflict in Africa. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gough, K. 1971. ‘Nuer Kinship: a Re-examination’, in The Translation of Culture, Beidelman, T. O. (ed.) London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Howell, P. P. 1954. A Manual of Nuer Law. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Mater, I. 1965. ‘From Kinship to Common Descent: Four Generation Genealogies among the Gusii’, Africa, xxv, 366–84.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. 1957. ‘The Subsistence Role of Cattle among the Pakot and in East Africa’ American Anthropologist, lxiii. 322–45.Google Scholar