Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T19:48:32.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specialist Knowledge Practices of Craftsmen and Clerics in Senegal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Roy Dilley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the specialized knowledge practices of two sets of culturally recognized ‘experts’ in Senegal: Islamic clerics and craftsmen. Their respective bodies of knowledge are often regarded as being in opposition, and in some respects antithetical, to one another. The aim of this article is to examine this claim by means of an investigation of how knowledge is conceived by each party. The analysis attempts to expose local epistemologies, which are deduced from an investigation of ‘expert’ knowledge practices and indigenous claims to knowledge. The social processes of knowledge acquisition and transmission are also examined with reference to the idea of initiatory learning. It is in these areas that commonalities between the bodies of knowledge and sets of knowledge practices are to be found. Yet, despite parallels between the epistemologies of both bodies of expertise and between their respective modes of knowledge transmission, the social consequences of ‘expertise’ are different in each case. The hierarchical relations of power that inform the articulation of the dominant clerics with marginalized craftsmen groups serve to profile ‘expertise’ in different ways, each one implying its own sense of authority and social range of legitimacy.

Cet article examine les pratiques de connaissance spécialisées de deux groupes d’« experts » culturellement reconnus au Sénégal: les religieux musulmans et les artisans. Leurs corps de connaissances respectifs sont souvent considérés comme mutuellement opposés, voire antithétiques à certains égards. Cet article a pour but d'examiner cette assertion en étudiant la manière dont cette connaissance est conçue par chacune des parties. L'analyse tente d'exposer des épistémologies locales déduites d'une étude des pratiques de connaissance « experte » et des revendications indigènes à la connaissance. Les processus sociaux de l'acquisition et de la transmission de la connaissance sont également examinés en référence à l'idée d'apprentissage initiatique. C'est dans ces domaines que l'on trouve des éléments communs aux corps de connaissances et aux groupes de pratiques de connaissance. Pourtant, malgré des parallèles entre les épistémologies des deux corps d'expertise et entre les modes respectifs de transmission de la connaissance, les conséquences sociales de cette « expertise » sont différentes dans chacun des cas. Les relations hiérarchiques de pouvoir qui informent l'articulation des religieux dominants avec des groupes d'artisans marginalisés servent à décrire l’« expertise » de différentes manières, chacune impliquant son propre sens de l'autorité et de l’éventail social de légitimité.

Type
Research-Articles
Information
Africa , Volume 79 , Issue 1: Knowledge in Practice: Expertise and the Transmission of Knowledge , February 2009 , pp. 53 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arens, W. and Karp, I. (eds) (1989) Creativity of Power: cosmology and action in African societies. Washington DC and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ba, Omar (1985–1986) ‘Le rôle des écoles islamiques dans le dévéloppement de la culture arabo-islamique dans le bassin du Fleuve Sénégal’. Doctoral thesis, Université de Paris IV-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Brenner, L. (1985) Reflexions sur le savoir islamique en Afrique de l'ouest. Bordeaux: Centre d'Etude d'Afrique Noire, Université de Bordeaux I.Google Scholar
Brenner, L. (2000a) ‘Sufism in Africa’ in Olupona, J. and Long, C. (eds), African Spirituality. New York NY: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Brenner, L. (2000b) Controlling Knowledge: religion, power and schooling in a West African Muslim society. London and Bloomington IN: C. Hurst and Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Coulon, C. (1988) ‘Women, Islam and baraka’ in O'Brien, D. B. Cruise and Coulon, C. (eds), Charisma and Brotherhood in African Islam. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crick, M. (1982) ‘Anthropology of knowledge’, Annual Review of Anthropology 11: 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (1989) ‘Secrets and skills: apprenticeship among Tukolor weavers’ in Coy, M. W. (ed.), Apprenticeship: from theory to method. New York NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (1992) ‘Dreams, inspiration and craftwork among Tukolor weavers’ in Jedrej, M. C. and Shaw, R. (eds), Dreaming, Religion and Society in Africa. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (1999) ‘Ways of knowing, forms of power: aspects of apprenticeship among Tukulor Mabube weavers’, Cultural Dynamics 11 (1): 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (2000) ‘The question of caste in West Africa, with special reference to Tukulor craftsmen’, Anthropos 95: 149–65.Google Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (2004) Islamic and Caste Knowledge Practices among Haalpulaaren, Senegal: between mosque and termite mound. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Dilley, R. M. (in press) ‘Daaira, devotional acts and the transformation of space in Senegal, West Africa’ in Hirji, Z. (ed.), Places of Worship and Devotion in the Muslim World. Oxford: Berghahn Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1949) The Sanusi of Cyrenaica. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. London: Peregrine Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984) The Foucault Reader, edited by Rabinow, P.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gaden, H. (1914) Le Poular, dialecte Peul du Fouta Sénégalais. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Gaden, H. (1931) Proverbes et Maximes Peuls et Toucouleurs. Paris: Institut d'Ethnologie.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (ed.) (1968) Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kante, N. (1993) Forgerons d'Afrique noire: transmission des savoirs traditionnels en pays malinké. Paris: l'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. (1985) The Holy War of Umar Tal: the Western Sudan in the mid-nineteenth century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, J. (1985) ‘Autour d'al-Hajj Umar Taal. Guerre sainte et Tijaniyya en Afrique de l'ouest’, Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines 25 (4): 555–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, J. (2000) ‘Le souffle de la parenté: mariage et transmission de la baraka chez des clercs musulmans de la vallée du Sénégal’, l'Homme 154: 241–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tall, E. K. (1984) ‘Guérir à Cubalel: interprétation de la maladie et pratiques thérapeutiques chez les Haalpulaaren dans la vallée du Fleuve Sénégal’. Doctoral thesis, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS).Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. (1990) Magic, Science, Religion and the Scope of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triaud, J.-L. (1988) ‘Khalwa and the career of sainthood: an interpretative essay’ in O'Brien, D. B. Cruise and Coulon, C. (eds), Charisma and Brotherhood in African Islam. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wilks, I. (1968) ‘The transmission of Islamic learning in the western Sudan’ in Goody, J. (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar