Article contents
The World Bank's Agenda for the Crises in Agriculture and Rural Development in Africa: An Introduction to a Debate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 May 2014
Extract
A number of international agencies (as well as other prominent institutions and individuals) have issued reports assessing the “crises” now perceived to afflict “development” in Africa. The Organization of African Unity's Lagos Plan of Action (OAU, 1980) emphasized historical legacies, deteriorating terms of trade, and Africa's dependence on foreign markets, and set out elements for a general strategy to escape these constraints by building self-reliant, local, and regional economies. Various Food and Agriculture Organization documents (e.g., FAO, 1983) and UNICEF's State of the Children Report (UNICEF, 1983) provide particularly grim pictures of food and nutritional deficiencies. The Economic Commission for Africa, in its “silver jubilee report,” analyzing recent history, emphasized that, if present trends continue, the “scenario” after the next twenty-five years will be a “nightmare” of “poverty” and “degradation” of life (UN ECA 1983).
The World Bank's 1981 report, Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Agenda for Action (hereafter Accelerated Development) also portrayed a “crisis” situation in food and agricultural production and called for some major policy changes in response. This document has probably attracted the lion's share of attention, certainly controversy. There are several reasons why the report deserves careful study and concerned discussion: it is readable, provocative, and comprehensive; it focuses on what are perceived to be “immediate problems” which “must be addressed if the widespread decline in per capita output” is to be “reverse”; it sets out an “agenda” of new “policies and programs to bring about this essential improvement” in the “production base” (World Bank, 1983: 1).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © African Studies Association 1984
References
Notes
1. All too little attention has been paid by lawyers, social scientists, and development practitioners to the problems under review here. For a collection of papers discussing them, see Third World Legal Studies 1982: Law in Alternative Strategies of Rural Development (1983).
2. The WCARRD Report (1979) explicitly called upon all countries striving for rural development to ratify ILO Convention 141 as an essential element of their development strategy. FAO is charged with the responsibility for following up this recommendation which is an interesting reflection of the explicit integration of human rights policies into development policies supposedly promoted by a significant international aid agency. Whether FAO has followed up this mandate is another issue.
- 4
- Cited by