Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:13:29.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choice and quality in home-based and community-based aged care: insights from two rapid evidence reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

Nicholas J. R. Hunter Open the ORCID record for Nicholas J. R. Hunter [Opens in a new window] ,
Yvonne Wells Open the ORCID record for Yvonne Wells [Opens in a new window] ,
Samantha J. Clune ,
Beatriz P. Ayala Quintanilla  and
Erica Johnstone
Nicholas J. R. Hunter*
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Yvonne Wells
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Samantha J. Clune
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Beatriz P. Ayala Quintanilla
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Erica Johnstone
Affiliation:
College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: n.hunter@latrobe.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As consumer-directed care programmes become increasingly common in aged care provision, there is a heightened requirement for literature summarising the experience and perspectives of recipients. We conducted rapid evidence reviews on two components of consumer experience of home- and community-based aged care: (a) drivers of choice when looking for a service (Question 1 (Q1)); and (b) perceptions of quality of services (Question 2 (Q2)). We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, and conducted manual (non-systematic) searches of primary and grey literature (e.g. government reports) across CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO, and Web of Science, Trove and OpenGrey databases. Articles deemed eligible after abstract/full-text screening subsequently underwent risk-of-bias assessment to ensure their quality. The final included studies (Q1: N = 21; Q2: N = 19) comprised both quantitative and qualitative articles, which highlighted that consumer choices of services are driven by a combination of: desire for flexibility in service provision; optimising mobility; need for personal assistance, security and safety, interaction, and social/leisure activities; and to target and address previously unmet needs. Similarly, consumer perspectives of quality include control and autonomy, interpersonal interactions, flexibility of choice, and safety and affordability. Our reviews suggest that future model development should take into account consumers’ freedom to choose services in a flexible manner, and the value they place on interpersonal relationships and social interaction.

Keywords

consumer-directed carehome-based carecommunity-based carepersonal budgetsaged careageing in placeindividual budgets
Type
Review Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , April 2021 , pp. 875 - 916
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Age, UK (2013) Making Managed Personal Budgets Work for Older People. London: Age UK.Google Scholar
Australia Government Department of Health (2018) Home Care Package Research Report. Canberra: AMR.Google Scholar
Bulamu, N, Kaambwa, B, Gill, L, Cameron, I, McKechnie, S, Fiebig, J, Grady, R and Ratcliffe, J (2017) Impact of consumer-directed care on quality of life in the community aged care sector. Geriatrics and Gerontology International 17, 1399–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cash, T, Moyle, W and O'Dwyer, S (2017) Relationships in consumer-directed care: an integrative literature review. Australasian Journal on Ageing 36, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, J, Taylor, ACT, Summons, P, Van Der Riet, P, Hunter, S, Maguire, J, Dilworth, S, Bellchambers, H, Jeong, S and Haydon, G (2017) Home care packages: insights into the experiences of older people leading up to the introduction of consumer directed care in Australia. Australian Journal of Primary Health 23, 162–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health and Ageing (2012) Aged Care Packages in the Community 2010–11: A Statistical Overview. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
Davitt, JK and Kaye, LW (2010) Racial/ethnic disparities in access to medicare home health care: the disparate impact of policy. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 53, 591–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, S (2012) ‘Being-in-the-world-of-care’: the lived experiences of older people receiving community aged care packages in Queensland. Health Care for Women International 33, 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, L, Brown, R, Phillips, B and Carlson, BL (2005) Easing the burden of caregiving: the impact of consumer direction on primary informal caregivers in Arkansas. The Gerontologist 45, 474–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gethin-Jones, S (2012 a) Outcomes and well-being part 1: a comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being. Working with Older People 16, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gethin-Jones, S (2012 b) Outcomes and well-being part 2: a comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being. A qualitative follow up study paper. Working with Older People 16, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, L, McCaffrey, N, Cameron, ID, Ratcliffe, J, Kaambwa, B, Corlis, M, Fiebig, J and Gresham, M (2017) Consumer Directed Care in Australia: early perceptions and experiences of staff, clients and carers. Health & Social Care in the Community 25, 478–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glendinning, C (2008) Increasing choice and control for older and disabled people: a critical review of new developments in England. Social Policy & Administration 42, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, MJ and Booth, A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigorovich, A (2016) The meaning of quality of care in home care settings: older lesbian and bisexual women's perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 30, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimmer, K, Kay, D, Foot, J and Pastakia, K (2015) Consumer views about aging-in-place. Clinical Interventions in Aging 10, 1803–1811.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrison, F, Low, LF, Barnett, A, Gresham, M and Brodaty, H (2014) What do clients expect of community care and what are their needs? The Community care for the Elderly: Needs and Service Use Study (CENSUS). Australasian Journal on Ageing 33, 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, C and Waters, J (2011) The National Personal Budget Survey. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Heumann, J (2003) Consumer-directed Personal Care Services for Older People in the US. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Kaambwa, B, Lancsar, E, McCaffrey, N, Chen, G, Gill, L, Cameron, ID, Crotty, M and Ratcliffe, J (2015) Investigating consumers’ and informal carers’ views and preferences for consumer directed care: a discrete choice experiment. Social Science & Medicine 140, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KPMG (2012) Evaluation of the Consumer-directed Care Initiative – Final Report. Melbourne: KPMG.Google Scholar
Kwak, C, Lee, E and Kim, H (2017) Factors related to satisfaction with long-term care services among low-income Korean elderly adults: a national cross-sectional survey. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 69, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, L-F, Fletcher, J, Gresham, M and Brodaty, H (2015) Community care for the Elderly: Needs and Service Use Study (CENSUS): who receives home care packages and what are the outcomes? Australasian Journal on Ageing 34, E1–E8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, L-F, Yap, M and Brodaty, H (2011) A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons. BMC Health Services Research 11, 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manthorpe, J, Martineau, S, Ridley, J, Cornes, M, Rosengard, A and Hunter, S (2015) Embarking on self-directed support in Scotland: a focused scoping review of the literature. European Journal of Social Work 18, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, N, Gill, L, Kaambwa, B, Cameron, ID, Patterson, J, Crotty, M and Ratcliffe, J (2015) Important features of home-based support services for older Australians and their informal carers. Health & Social Care in the Community 23, 654–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, P, Patton, MA, McGrath, Z, Olgivie, K, Rayner, R and Holewa, H (2006) ‘It's very difficult to get respite out here at the moment’: Australian findings on end-of-life care for Indigenous people. Health & Social Care in the Community 14, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, N, Glendinning, C, Wilberforce, M, Stevens, M, Netten, A, Jones, K, Manthorpe, J, Knapp, M, Fernández, JL, Challis, D and Jacobs, S (2013) Older people's experiences of cash-for-care schemes: evidence from the English Individual Budget pilot projects. Ageing & Society 33, 826–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbronner, L, Chamberlain, R, Bosanquet, K, Bartlett, C, Sass, B and Glendinning, C (2011) Keeping Personal Budgets Personal: Learning from the Experiences of Older People, People with Mental Health Problems and Their Carers. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
Norrie, C, Weinstein, J, Jones, R, Hood, R and Bhanbro, S (2014) Early experiences in extending personal budgets in one local authority. Working with Older People 18, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, G (2016) Older people, personalisation and self: an alternative to the consumerist paradigm in social care. Ageing & Society 36, 1008–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottmann, G, Allen, J and Feldman, P (2013) A systematic narrative review of consumer-directed care for older people: implications for model development. Health & Social Care in the Community 21, 563–581.Google ScholarPubMed
Rabiee, P and Glendinning, C (2014) Choice and control for older people using home care services: how far have council-managed personal budgets helped? Quality in Ageing and Older Adults 15, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiee, P, Moran, N and Glendinning, C (2008) Individual budgets: lessons from early users’ experiences. British Journal of Social Work 39, 918–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioux, L and Werner, C (2011) Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, 158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Antonio, P, Simon-Rusinowitz, L, Loughlin, D, Eckert, JK, Mahoney, KJ and Ruben, KAD (2009) Lessons from the Arkansas Cash and Counseling Program: how the experiences of diverse older consumers and their caregivers address family policy concerns. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 22, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, B, Kimberley, H and McColl Jones, N (2016) Adjusting to Consumer Directed Care: The Experience of Brotherhood of St Laurence Community Aged Care Service Users. Melbourne: Brotherhood of St Laurence.Google Scholar
Smith-Carrier, T, Sinha, SK, Nowaczynski, M, Akhtar, S, Seddon, G and Pham, TNT (2017) It ‘makes you feel more like a person than a patient’: patients’ experiences receiving home-based primary care (HBPC) in Ontario, Canada. Health & Social Care in the Community 25, 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, L and White, L (2011) A sociocognitive approach to service quality and adherence amongst elderly patients: A pilot study. Health Marketing Quarterly 28, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Hoof, J, Kort, HSM, Rutten, PGS and Duijnstee, MSH (2011) Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80, 310–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolham, J, Daly, G, Sparks, T, Ritters, K and Steils, N (2017) Do direct payments improve outcomes for older people who receive social care? Differences in outcome between people aged 75+ who have a managed personal budget or a direct payment. Ageing & Society 37, 961–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamfir, M (2013) Personalisation through personal budgets: its effectiveness for older adults in social care services. Findings from an English-based literature review. Research, Policy and Planning 30, 77–89.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hunter et al. supplementary material

Hunter et al. supplementary material 1

Download Hunter et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hunter et al. supplementary material

Hunter et al. supplementary material 2

Download Hunter et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hunter et al. supplementary material

Hunter et al. supplementary material 3
Download Hunter et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15 KB