Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:31:29.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Youngsplaining’ and moralistic judgements: exploring ageism through the lens of digital ‘media ideologies’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2020

Francesca Comunello Open the ORCID record for Francesca Comunello [Opens in a new window] ,
Andrea Rosales Open the ORCID record for Andrea Rosales [Opens in a new window] ,
Simone Mulargia ,
Francesca Ieracitano ,
Francesca Belotti  and
Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
Francesca Comunello*
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy
Andrea Rosales
Affiliation:
IN3, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Simone Mulargia
Affiliation:
Department of Communication and Social Research, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Francesca Ieracitano
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy
Francesca Belotti
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy IN3, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
Affiliation:
IN3, Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. Email: francescacomunello@gmail.com; f.comunello@lumsa.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we explore ageist depictions of both young and older people as they emerge from discourses addressing ‘other people's’ digital media usage practices. We carried out eight focus groups (four with teenagers, four with people aged 65 or older) in two southern European cities (Rome and Barcelona). By negotiating the affordances and constraints of (digital) tools and platforms, people develop their own usage norms and strategies, which might – or might not – be intersubjectively shared. Discourses surrounding usage practices and norms tend to refer to what people understand as an appropriate way of using digital platforms: these discourses proved to be powerful triggers for expressing ageist stereotypes; ‘the others’ were depicted, by both teenage and older participants, as adopting inappropriate usage practices (with regard to content, form, skills and adherence to social norms). These reflections proved to have broader implications on how other age cohorts are perceived: participants tended to take discourses on digital media usage as an opportunity for making generalised judgements about ‘the others’, which address their manners, as well as their attitude towards communication and social life. Inter-group discrimination processes and ageist stereotypes play a major role in shaping the strong moralistic and patronising judgements expressed by older and younger participants towards ‘the other’ age cohort.

Keywords

ageismstereotypesdigital mediasocial mediaolder peopleteenagersmoralistic attitudespatronising attitudes
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , April 2022 , pp. 938 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Angus, J and Reeve, P (2006) Ageism: a threat to ‘aging well’ in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Gerontology 25, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, L and Tesch-Römer, C (eds) (2018) Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Open.10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilandzic, H (2011) The complicated relationship between media and morality. Journal of Media Psychology 23, 46–51.10.1027/1864-1105/a000032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, J (2019) Gerontechnology. London: Emerald.10.1108/9781787432918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodner, E, Bergman, YS and Cohen-Fridel, S (2012) Different dimensions of ageist attitudes among men and women: a multigenerational perspective. International Psychogeriatrics 24, 895–901.10.1017/S1041610211002936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyatzis, RE (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
boyd d (2011) Social network sites as networked publics. Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Z (ed.), A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 9–58.Google Scholar
Braun, V and Clarke, V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bude, H (1997) Die Wir-Schicht der Generation. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 7, 197–204.Google Scholar
Colombo, F and Fortunati, L (2011) Broadband Society and Generational Changes. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-00756-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, F, Aroldi, P and Carlo, S (2018) ‘ I use it correctly!’: the use of ICTs among Italian grandmothers in a generational perspective. Human Technology 14, 343–365.10.17011/ht/urn.201811224837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comunello, F, Mulargia, S and Parisi, L (2016) The ‘proper’ way to spread ideas through social media: exploring the affordances and constraints of different social media platforms as perceived by Italian activists. Sociological Review 64, 515–532.10.1111/1467-954X.12378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comunello, F, Fernández-Ardèvol, M, Mulargia, S and Belotti, F (2017) Women, youth and everything else: age-based and gendered stereotypes in relation to digital technology among elderly Italian mobile phone users. Media, Culture & Society 39, 798–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsten, M (1999) The time of generations. Time and Society 8, 249–272.10.1177/0961463X99008002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, JF, Gaertner, SL and Kawakami, K (2003) Intergroup contact: the past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 6, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Gay, P, Hall, S, Janes, L, Madsen, AK, Mackay, H and Negus, K (2013) Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2019 a) Individuals Who Used the Internet, Frequency of Use and Activities [isoc_r_iuse_i]. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_r_iuse_i&lang=en.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2019 b) Individuals – Internet Use [isoc_ci_ifp_iu]. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_ci_ifp_iu&lang=en.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ardèvol, M and Prieto, LA (2012) Mobile telephony and older people: exploring use and rejection. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 3, 9–24.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ardèvol, M and Rosales, A. (2017)) My interests, my activities: Learning from an intergenerational comparison of smartwatch use. In Zhou, J and Salvendy, G (eds). International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Cham: Springer, pp. 114–129.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ardèvol, M, Sawchuk, K and Grenier, L (2017) Maintaining connections. Nordicom Review 38, 39–51.10.1515/nor-2017-0396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortunati, L, Taipale, S and de Luca, F (2019) Digital generations, but not as we know them. Convergence 25, 95–112.10.1177/1354856517692309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J and McEwan, B (2017) Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: the perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs 84, 298–318.10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershon, I (2010) The Breakup 2.0: Disconnecting Over New Media. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B and Strauss, A (1967) Grounded theory: the discovery of grounded theory. Sociology – The Journal of the British Sociological Association 12, 27–49.Google Scholar
Goffman, E (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Guest, G, MacQueen, KM and Namey, EE (2011) Applied Thematic Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Haidt, J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108, 814–834.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakemulder, J (2000) The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-concept. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, MM, Kaiser, BN and Marconi, VC (2017) Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research 27, 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, P and Gilleard, C (2020) The ideology of ageism versus the social imaginary of the fourth age: two differing approaches to the negative contexts of old age. Ageing & Society 40, 1617–1630.10.1017/S0144686X19000096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, S, Killen, M and Stangor, C (1999) The influence of group stereotypes on adolescents’ moral reasoning. Journal of Early Adolescence 19, 98–113.10.1177/0272431699019001005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (2017) World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database, 21st Edn. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.Google Scholar
Kadylak, T, Makki, TW, Francis, J, Cotton, SR, Rikard, RV and Sah, YJ (2018) Disrupted copresence: older adults’ views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions. Mobile Media & Communication 6, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L (1981) Essays on Moral Development: The Psychology of Moral Development, Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lagacé, M, Charmarkeh, H, Laplante, J and Tanguay, A (2015) How ageism contributes to the second-level digital divide: the case of Canadian seniors. Journal of Technologies and Human Usability 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madianou, M (2014) Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 19, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madianou, M and Miller, D (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16, 169–187.10.1177/1367877912452486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, K (1952) The problem of generation. In Mannheim, K (ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 276–320.Google Scholar
Massey, O (2011) A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research 34, 21–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, JA (2008) Designing a qualitative study. In Bickman, L and Rog, DJ (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 214–253.Google Scholar
Maxwell, JA (2012) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Morse, JM (2017) Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In Denzin, NK and Lincoln, YS (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th Edn. London: Sage, pp. 796–817.Google Scholar
Neves, BB and Amaro, F (2012) Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT. Journal of Community Informatics 8, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, DA (2013) Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piccioni, T, Scarcelli, CM and Stella, R (2020) Inexperienced, addicted, at risk. How young people describe their parents’ use of digital media. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 12, 270–292.Google Scholar
Rainie, L and Wellman, B (2012) Networked. The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutland, A, Killen, M and Abrams, D (2010) A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: the interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, 279–291.10.1177/1745691610369468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stallybrass, O (1977) Stereotype. In Bullock, A, Stallybrass, O and Trombley, S (eds), The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. London: Fontana/Collins, p. 601.Google Scholar
Stangor, C and Schaller, M (2000) Stereotypes as individual and collective representations. In Stangor, C (ed.), Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, pp. 64–82.Google Scholar
Taipale, S, Petrovcic, A and Dolnicar, V (2018) Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families. In Taipale, S, Wilska, TA and Gilleard, C (eds), Digital Technologies and Generational Identity: ICT Usage Across the Life Course. London: Routledge, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American 223, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H and Turner, JC ([1979] 2004) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hatch, MJ and Schultz, M (eds), Organizational Identity: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Trentham, B, Sokoloff, S, Tsang, A and Neysmith, S (2015) Social media and senior citizen advocacy: an inclusive tool to resist ageism? Politics, Groups, and Identities 3, 558–571.10.1080/21565503.2015.1050411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J and Haddon, L (eds) (2017) Smartphone Cultures. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315307077CrossRefGoogle Scholar