No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Estimating the Impact of Conservation Reserve Program Contract Expiration on Corn and Wheat Prices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2016
Abstract
The Conservation Reserve Program reduced available cropland in the United States by 34 million acres under the first nine signup periods (1986–1990). Among these are ten million acres with wheat base and four million acres with corn base, which could potentially produce 288 million bushels of wheat and 340 million bushels of corn per year upon contract expiration. The impacts of expiring CRP contacts on the production and prices of wheat and corn in the United States are estimated. Based on past production practices and post-CRP land-use intentions of contract holders, 48.2% of base acres enrolled in CRP will return to production. Under this scenario, wheat prices will decline by more than 7% and corn prices by more than 2% by 2000, unless ARP levels, normal flex acres percent, or target prices are changed.
- Type
- Agricultural, Resource, and Environmental Policies in the 1990s
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1994 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
References
Dicks, Michael R. “Recursive Programming for Agricultural Policy Analysis.” Paper presented at the 23rd annual Missouri Valley Economics Association Meetings, Kansas City, Missouri, February 26–28, 1987.Google Scholar
NCT-163 Proceedings of the NCT-163 Post Conservation Reserve Program Land Use Conference, Denver, CO, January 10–11, 1994, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Dicks, Michael R, and Osborn, C. Tim “Land Use Issues.” Chapter 6 in Food and Agricultural Issues and Choices for 1995
, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dicks, M.R., Ray, D.E., and Ugarte, D. “An Integrated System for Analyzing Agricultural and Environmental Policies.” Proceedings of the Conference on Decision Support Systems for Resource Management, College Station, TX, April 15–18, 1991.Google Scholar
Dicks, Michael R., Llacuna, Felix, and Linsenbigler, Michael. The Conservation Reserve Program: Implementation and Accomplishments, 1986–87. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Statistical Bulletin Number 763, Jan. 1988.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. “Summary of the FAPRI Baseline.” November 1992.Google Scholar
Garrison, Carl O., Brorsen, B. Wade, Adam, Brian D., and Dicks, Mike. “Recropping Rates of Conservation Reserve Program Acreage.” Selected paper, 1993 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, Tulsa, OK. Abstract published in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, July 25, No. 1(1993):283.Google Scholar
Hertel, Thomas W., and Preckel, Paul V. “Extending the Conservation Reserve: What Effect on Commodity Prices and Budget Cost?” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 43(1): 106–108.Google Scholar
Nowak, Peter J., Schnepf, Max, and Barnes, Roy. When Conservation Reserve Program Contracts Expire. Soil and Water Conservation Society, 1991.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tim. “Summary Analysis of Post-CRP Land Use Intentions in the Great Plains.” Selected paper, 1992 annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Baltimore, MD., August 1992. Abstract published in American Journal of Agricultural Economics,Google Scholar
Osborn, Tim, Llacuna, Felix, and Linsenbigler, Michael. 3. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Statistical Bulletin Number 811, July 1990.Google Scholar
Ray, Daryll E. “Description of POLYSIM: A National Agricultural Policy Model.” Chapter 2 in Sector Models: Description and Selected Policy Applications
, ed. Taylor, C. Robert, Johnson, Stanley R., and Katherine, H.
Reichelderfer, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert C. “Supply Control Aspects of the Conservation Reserve.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1990.Google Scholar