Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T08:16:06.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield Variability and Agricultural Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Jeffrey J. Reimer  and
Man Li
Jeffrey J. Reimer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon
Man Li
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine how changes in yield variability affect the welfare of cereal grain and oilseed buyers and producers around the world. We simulate trade patterns and welfare for 21 countries with a Ricardian trade model that incorporates bilateral trade costs and crop yield distributions. The model shows that world trade volumes would need to increase substantially if crop yield variability were to rise. Net welfare effects, however, are moderate so long as countries do not resort to policies that inhibit trade, such as export restrictions or measures to promote self-sufficiency in crops. Low-income countries suffer the most from increases in yield variability, due to higher bilateral trade costs and lower-than-average productivity.

Keywords

cropsgeographygrainstrade liberalizationyield variability
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , October 2009 , pp. 258 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alvarez, F., and Lucas, R.E. Jr. 2005. “General Equilibrium Analysis of the Eaton-Kortum Model of International Trade.” NBER Paper No. 11764, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Anderson, J., and Hazell, P. 1987. Variability in Grain Yields: Implications for Agricultural Research and Policy in Developing Countries. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Armington, P.S. 1969. “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Papers 16: 159–178.Google Scholar
Bale, M.D., and Lutz, E. 1979. “The Effects of Trade Intervention on International Price Instability.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(3): 512–516.Google Scholar
Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jenson, J.B., and Kortum, S. 2003. “Plants and Productivity in International Trade.” American Economic Review 93(4): 1268–1290.Google Scholar
Bradsher, K. 2008. “A Drought in Australia, a Global Shortage of Rice.” New York Times (April 17).Google Scholar
Chen, C.C., McCarl, B.A., and Schimmelpfennig, D.E. 2004. “Yield Variability as Influenced by Climate: A Statistical Investigation.” Climatic Change 66: 239–261.Google Scholar
Dimaranan, B., and McDougall, R. (eds.). 2007. Global Trade, Assistance, and Protection: The GTAP 6 Data Base. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, J., and Kortum, S. 2002. “Technology, Geography, and Trade.” Econometrica 70(5): 1741–1779.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2008. Statistical databases Available at www.fao.org (accessed March and April 2008).Google Scholar
Hallstrom, D. 2004. “Interannual Climate Variation, Climate Prediction, and Agricultural Trade: The Costs of Surprise versus Variability.” Review of International Economics 12(3): 441–455.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. “The Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isik, M., and Devadoss, S. 2006. “An Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yields and Yield Variability.” Applied Economics 38(7): 835–844.Google Scholar
Meehl, G., and Washington, W. 1993. “South Asian Summer Monsoon Variability in a Model with Doubled Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration.” Science 260: 1101–1104.Google Scholar
Meehl, G., Zwiers, F., Evans, J., Knutson, T., Mearns, L.O., and Whetton, P. 2000. “Trends in Extreme Weather and Climate Events: Issues Related to Modeling Extremes in Projections of Future Climate Change.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 81(12): 427–436.Google Scholar
Newbery, D.M., and Stiglitz, J.E. 1981. The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization: A Study in the Economics of Risk. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parry, M., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M., and Fischer, G. 2004. “Effects of Climate Change on Global Food Production Under SRES Emissions and Socio-Economic Scenarios.” Global Environmental Change 14: 53–67.Google Scholar
Randhir, T., and Hertel, T. 2000. “Trade Liberalization as a Vehicle for Adapting to Global Warming.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2): 159–172.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., and Hohmann, N. 1993. “Climate Change and Agriculture: The Role of International Trade.” American Economic Review 83(2): 306–312.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Tubiello, F., McCarl, B., Abler, D., Darwin, R., Fuglie, K., Hollinger, S., Izaurralde, C., Jagtap, S., Jones, J., Mearns, L., Ojima, D., Paul, E., Paustian, K., Riha, S., Rosenberg, N., and Rosenzweig, C. 2002. Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, M., Strzepek, K., and Msangi, S. 2005. “Impact of Climate Change and Variability on Global Food Supplies.” Presentation at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium meetings, San Diego (December 4-6).Google Scholar
Ruttan, V.W. 2001. Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. 1981. “A Survey of Recent U.S. Developments in International Agricultural Trade Models.” Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture No. 21, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar