Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:45:59.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Issues in case-based design systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Pearl Pu
Pearl Pu
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, U-155, Storrs, CT 06269, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Serving as a guest editor of this special journal issue, I review in this introductory paper some of the important issues concerning applying case-based reasoning (CBR) techniques to the design domain. Through discussions of these issues, I attempt to give the current status of the case-based design field, with surveys of existing case-based design systems and a summary from the first workshop held on this subject. For those who are less familiar with CBR, this paper also contains a section on what CBR method is and how it is contrasted with other reasoning approaches. The last section of this article introduces the papers included in this issue.

Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, L. K. 1992. The use of primitive generic components for the structuring of design cases. In Unpublished Proceedings of the AID'92 Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pu, P., ed., pp 5–8.Google Scholar
Ashley, K. D. 1987. Distinguishing—a resoner's wedge. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barber, J., Bhatta, S., Goel, A., Jacobsen, M., Pearce, M., Penberthy, L., Shankar, M. and Stroulia, E. 1992. Askjef: integrating case-based reasoning and multimedia technologies for interface design support. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, J., Gero, ed., pp 457–476, Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bareiss, R. (ed.). 1991. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Barletta, R. and Hennessy, D. 1989. Case adaptation in autoclave layout design. In Proceedings of Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (DARPA), Hammond, K., ed.Google Scholar
Davis, R. 1982. Expert Systems: Where Are We? And Where Do We Go from Here? Report AIM-665, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Davis, R., Buchanan, B. and Shortliffe, E. 1997. Production rules as a representation for a knowledge-based consultation program. Artificial Intelligence 8(1).Google Scholar
Domeshek, E. and Kolodner, J. 1992. A case-based design aid for architecture. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Design (Aid'92), Gero, J., ed., pp 497–516. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Faltings, B., Hua, K., Schmitt, G. and Shih, S. 1991. Case-based representation of architectural design knowledge. In Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. pp 307–316.Google Scholar
Goel, A. 1989. Integration of Case-Based Reasoning and Model-Based Reasoning for Adaptive Design Problem Solving. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Goel, A. 1991. A model-based approach to case adaptation. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goel, A., Kolodner, J., Pearce, M., Billington, R. and Zimring, C. A. 1991. Case-based tool for conceptual design problem solving. In Proceedings of the Third DARPA Workshop for Case-Based Reasoning, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. J. 1989. Case-based Planning: Viewing Planning as a Memory Task. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, K. J. (ed.) 1989. Proceedings of the Second Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, T. and Kolodner, J. 1991. The roles of adaptation in case-based design. In Proceedings of AAAI-91, New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, T. R. 1988. Towards an architecture for open world problem solving. In Proceedings of Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (DARPA), Kolodner, J., ed., New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, T. R. 1992. Problem Solving in Open Worlds: A Case Study in Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, T. R. 1992(b). Using case-based reasoning for plausible design tasks. In Unpublished Proceedings of the AID'92 Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pu, P., ed., pp 29–37.Google Scholar
Hua, K., Schmitt, G. and Faltings, B. 1992. What can case-based design do? In Unpublished Proceedings of the AID'92 Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pu, P., ed., pp 44–53.Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L. 1984. Retrieval and Organizational Strategies in Conceptual Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L. (ed.). 1988. Proceedings of the First Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Koldner, J. L. 1992. CBR for design. In Unpublished Workshop Notes of Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems. Pu, P., ed., pp. 54–56.Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L. 1993. Case-Based Reasoning. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodner, J. L., Simpson, R. and Sycara, K. 1985. A process model of case-based reasoning in problem solving. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
Lobowitz, M. 1980. Generalization and memory in an integrated understanding system. Technical Report Research Report 186, Yale University.Google Scholar
Maher, M. L. and Zhang, D. M. 1991. CADSYN: using case and decomposition knowledge for design synthesis. In Artificial Intelligence in Design'91, London: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mark, W. 1989. Case-based reasoning for autoclave management. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning.Google Scholar
Navinchandra, D. 1988. Case-based reasoning in cyclops, a design problem solver. In Proceedings of Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Kolodner, J., ed. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Navinchandra, D. 1991. Exploration and Innovation in Design, Towards a Computational Model. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navinchandra, D., Sycara, S. K. and Narasimhan, , 1991. A transformational approach to case-based synthesis. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 5(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, R. 1992. Putting the case in place: Content-based indexing and representation in design. In Proceedings of the AID'92 Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pu, P., ed., pp 65–67.Google Scholar
Pu, P. ed. 1992. Unpublished Proceedings of the AID'92 Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pittsburgh, PN: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Pu, P. and Reschberger, M. 1991. Assembly sequence planning using case-based reasoning technique. In Artificial Intelligence in Design'91, London: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Riesbeck, C. and Schank, R. C. 1989. Inside Case-based Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rissland, E. L. and Ashley, K. D. 1986. Hypotheticals as heuristic device. In Proceedings of the National Conference of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Ruecker, L. and Seering, W. P. 1992. Indexing cases using context rather than content. In Unpublished Workshop Notes of Workshop on Case-Based Design Systems, Pu, P., ed., pp 73–76.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. 1986. Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar