Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T05:35:53.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative review on the role of stimuli in idea generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2023

Graziana Blandino Open the ORCID record for Graziana Blandino [Opens in a new window] ,
Francesca Montagna ,
Marco Cantamessa  and
Samuele Colombo Open the ORCID record for Samuele Colombo [Opens in a new window]
Graziana Blandino*
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino 10129, Italy
Francesca Montagna
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino 10129, Italy
Marco Cantamessa
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino 10129, Italy
Samuele Colombo
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Torino 10129, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Blandino Graziana; Email: graziana.blandino@polito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports a systematic literature review with the aim of determining the role of stimuli and other factors, such as timing, the designers’ background, expertise, and experience, in the idea generation phase of conceptual design related to engineering and industrial design and architecture. “Stimulus” is a general expression for a source of information characterized by several features, including the source (internal or external), analogical distance (near or far), and form (textual, visual, or other). Several recent studies have been conducted on this topic involving neurophysiological measurements with significant results. This comprehensive review will help to determine if the neurophysiological results are consistent with those from protocol studies. This allows for determining how the features of stimuli affect – among the related factors – designers’ performance in idea generation. The literature search was carried out using the Snowball and PRISMA methods. A total of 72 contributions were selected from studies adopting protocol analysis or neurophysiological measurements. This study presents a framework to support the selection of stimuli most likely to maximize performance, based on the designer's background and expertise in the different idea generation metrics. The main findings of the framework suggest that visual stimuli enhance the creative performance of designers, regardless of their background, while textual stimuli foster the variety and quality of ideas, but only in engineering and industrial designers. Comparing the findings, the resulting framework reveals aspects of stimuli that require further investigation. These can be considered valuable insights for new directions for design research.

Keywords

conceptual designidea generationreviewstimulisource of inspiration
Type
Review Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 37 , 2023 , e19
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, O (2002) Case-based instruction strategies in architecture. Design Studies 23, 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Assadi, FI (2022) Bio-metaphor in Iraqi architecture (date palm as model). Journal of Engineering Research (Kuwait) 10, 15–31.Google Scholar
Bi, Y, Shergadwala, M, Reid, T and Panchal, JH (2015) Understanding the utilization of information stimuli in design decision making using eye gaze data. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2A: 41st, Design Automation Conference, Paper No: DETC2015-46495, V02AT03A017, Boston, MA, USA, August 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilda, Z and Gero, JS (2007) The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies, 28, 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilda, Z, Gero, JS and Purcell, T (2006) To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies 27, 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgianni, Y and MacCioni, L (2020) Review of the use of neurophysiological and biometric measures in experimental design research. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 34, 248–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgianni, Y, Maccioni, L, Fiorineschi, L and Rotini, F (2020) Forms of stimuli and their effects on idea generation in terms of creativity metrics and non-obviousness. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 8, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, C and Badke-Schaub, P (2011) The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45, 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, C, Badke-Schaub, P and Luz, A (2009). Design fixation on non-verbal stimuli: the influence of simple vs. rich pictorial information on design problem-solving. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 8: 14th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 6th Symposium on International Design and Design Education; 21st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Parts A and B, Paper No: DETC2009-86826, San Diego, CA, USA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Casakin, H (2010) Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: the effect of expertise. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37, 170–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascini, G, Fiorineschi, L and Rotini, F (2020) Impact of design representations on creativity of design outcomes. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 23, 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chai, C, Cen, F, Ruan, W, Yang, C and Li, H (2015) Behavioral analysis of analogical reasoning in design: differences among designers with different expertise levels. Design Studies 36, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J, Fu, K, Schunn, C, Cagan, J, Wood, K and Kotovsky, K (2011) On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 133, 081004, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J, Dow, SP and Schunn, CD (2015) Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies 36, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, H and Shu, LH (2013) Using templates and mapping strategies to support analogical transfer in biomimetic design. Design Studies 34, 706–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, S, Mazza, A, Montagna, F, Ricci, R, Dal Monte, O and Cantamessa, M (2020) Neurophysiological evidence in idea generation: differences between designers and engineers. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference 1, 1415–1424.Google Scholar
Cross, N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Design studies 25, 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, D, Hender, J, Rodgers, T and Santanen, E (2006) Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7, 646–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doboli, A, Umbarkar, A, Subramanian, V and Doboli, S (2014) Two experimental studies on creative concept combinations in modular design of electronic embedded systems. Design Studies 35, 80–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogan, F, Taneri, B and Erbil, L (2019) Use of analogies, metaphors, and similes by students and reviewers at an undergraduate architectural design review. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 33, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilouti, BH (2009) Design knowledge recycling using precedent-based analysis and synthesis models. Design Studies 30, 340–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A, Grabner, RH, Gebauer, D, Reishofer, G, Koschutnig, K and Ebner, F (2010) Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage 52, 1687–1695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiorineschi, L, Frillici, FS and Rotini, F (2020) Challenging COVID-19 with creativity: supporting design space exploration for emergency ventilators. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 10, 4955, 1–23.Google Scholar
Fu, K, Chan, J, Cagan, J, Kotovsky, K, Schunn, C and Wood, K (2013) The meaning of near and far: the impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 135, 021007, 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, K, Murphy, J, Yang, M, Otto, K, Jensen, D and Wood, K (2015) Design-by-analogy: experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement. Research in Engineering Design 26, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, JS (2011) Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. Journal of Creative Behavior 45, 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J and Milovanovic, J (2020) A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains. Design Science 6, E19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G and Sever, AL (2011) Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies 32, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G and Smolkov, M (2006) Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies 27, 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, M, Badke-Schaub, P and Cardoso, C (2011) Around you: how designers get inspired. The impact of inspiration in co-evolution of the problem and solution space View project Creative Space View project, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, 15–18.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, M, Cardoso, C and Badke-Schaub, P (2014) What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies 35, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, M, Cardoso, C and Badke-Schaub, P (2016) Inspiration choices that matter: the selection of external stimuli during ideation. Design Science 2, E10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goucher-Lambert, K and Cagan, J (2017) Using crowdsourcing to provide analogies for designer ideation in a cognitive study. In DS 87-8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17). Vol 8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, August 21–25.Google Scholar
Goucher-Lambert, K, Moss, J and Cagan, J (2018) Inspired internal search: using neuroimaging to understand design ideation and concept generation with inspirational stimuli. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 51845. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper No: DETC2018-85690, V007T06A007, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, August 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goucher-Lambert, K, Moss, J and Cagan, J (2019) A neuroimaging investigation of design ideation with and without inspirational stimuli – understanding the meaning of near and far stimuli. Design Studies 60, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadian, A (2015) Using metaphor and analogy for understanding structural concepts in architectural education; an Iranian perspective. Open House International 40, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, L, Duffy, AHB, McTeague, C, Pidgeon, LM, Vuletic, T and Grealy, M (2017) A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: design as search and exploration. Design Science 3, E10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, L, Duffy, AH, Gilbert, SJ, Lyall, L, Campbell, G, Coyle, D and Grealy, MA (2019) The neural correlates of ideation in product design engineering practitioners. Design Science 5, e29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, L, Cash, P and McKilligan, S (2020) The future of design cognition analysis. Design Science 6, e20, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, M, Vattam, SS and Goel, AK (2009) Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies 30, 606–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, NV, Shah, JJ and Smith, SM (2010) Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies 31, 382–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, M, Shealy, T and Milovanovic, J (2021) Cognitive differences among first-year and senior engineering students when generating design solutions with and without additional dimensions of sustainability. Design Science 7, e1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, WL and Reid, T (2018) The effects of designers contextual experience on the ideation process and design outcomes. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 140, 101101, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, D, Choi, B, Bae, S and Park, W (2021) Mitigating design fixation: a visualization tool for enhancing situation awareness. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 143143, 061402, 1–9.Google Scholar
Jia, L, Becattini, N, Cascini, G and Tan, R (2020) Testing ideation performance on a large set of designers: effects of analogical distance. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 8, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavakli, M and Gero, JS (2002) The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies 23, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshwani, S and Chakrabarti, A (2017) Influence of analogical domains and comprehensiveness in explanation of analogy on the novelty of designs. Research in Engineering Design 28, 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirjavainen, S and Hölttä-Otto, K (2020) Deconstruction of idea generation methods into a framework of creativity mechanisms. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 2021, 143, 031401, 1–15.Google Scholar
Koronis, G, Silva, A and Kang, J (2018) The impact of design briefs on creativity: a study on measuring student designers outcomes. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN 5, 2461–2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryssanov, VV, Tamaki, H and Ueda, K (1999) Synthesis and emergence in engineering design problem solving. Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, IEEE, 690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V and Mocko, G (2016) Similarity of engineering design problems to enable reuse in design research experiments. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 50190. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper No: DETC2016-60474, V007T06A042, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, August 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahy, K, Daly, SR, McKilligan, S and Seifert, CM (2020) Design fixation from initial examples: provided versus self-generated ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 142, 101402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, C, Lin, CT, Yao, SN, Chang, WS, Liu, YC and Chen, SA (2017) Visual attention and association: an electroencephalography study in expert designers. Design Studies 48, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsey, JS, Laux, J, Clauss, EF, Wood, KL and Markman, AB (2007) Effects of analogous product representation on design-by-analogy. In DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, 28.-31.07. 2007, 337–338.Google Scholar
Liikkanen, LA and Perttula, M (2010) Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 21, 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majdic, B, Cowan, C, Girdner, J, Opoku, W, Pierrakos, O and Barrella, E (2017). Monitoring brain waves in an effort to investigate student's cognitive load during a variety of problem solving scenarios. In 2017 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaga, RA (2000) The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems 29, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoy, FL, Vargas-Hernández, N, Summers, JD and Shah, JJ (2001) Influence of design representation on effectiveness of idea generation. Proceedings of the ASME 2001 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 4: 13th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Pittsburgh, PA, USA. September 9–12, 2001, 39–48.Google Scholar
Mohan, M, Chen, Y and Shah, JJ (2011) Towards a framework for holistic ideation in conceptual design. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 54792, 661–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG and Prisma Group. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, DP, Hernández, AA, Yang, MC, Otto, KN, Hölttä-Otto, K, Linsey, JS, Wood, KL and Linden, A (2014) Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies 35, 232–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, DP, Blessing, LT, Yang, MC, Hernández, AA and Wood, KL (2016) Overcoming design fixation: design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 30, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougenot, C, Bouchard, C, Aoussat, A and Westerman, S (2008) Inspiration, images and design: an investigation of designers’ information gathering strategies. Journal of Design Research 7, 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelius, T, Doellken, M, Zimmerer, C and Matthiesen, S (2020) The impact of confirmation bias on reasoning and visual attention during analysis in engineering design: an eye tracking study. Design Studies 71, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozkan, O and Dogan, F (2013) Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: differences between expert and novice designers. Design Studies 34, 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A, Elena, MV and Summers, J (2019) A systematic approach to evaluating design prompts in supporting experimental design research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, August, 2755–2764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perttula, MK and Liikkanen, LA (2006) Structural tendencies and exposure effects in design idea generation. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 42584, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, AT and Gero, JS (1992) Effects of examples on the results of a design activity. Knowledge-Based Systems 5, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royo, M, Mulet, E, Chulvi, V and Felip, F (2021) Guiding questions for increasing the generation of product ideas to meet changing needs (QuChaNe). Research in Engineering Design 32, 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P and Chakrabarti, A (2008) The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 22, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, JJ, Vargas-Hernandez, N and Smith, SM (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, R (2019) Metrics to select design tasks in experimental creativity research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 233, 440–450.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, V, Song, B, Luo, J, Subburaj, K, Elara, MR, Blessing, L and Wood, K (2018) Does analogical distance affect performance of ideation? Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 140, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, M and Sketch, J (1997) Managing effective communication in knitwear design. Design Journal 2, 923–928.Google Scholar
Sun, L, Xiang, W, Chai, C, Wang, C and Liu, Z (2013) Impact of text on idea generation: an electroencephalography study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23, 1047–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, G, Yao, S and Carretero, JA (2014) Comparing cognitive efficiency of experienced and inexperienced designers in conceptual design processes. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 8, 330–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suwa, M and Tversky, B (1997) What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todoroff, EC, Shealy, T, Milovanovic, J, Godwin, A and Paige, F (2021) Comparing design thinking traits between national samples of civil engineering and architecture students. Journal of Civil Engineering Education 147, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Carrion, PV, Gonzalez-Gonzalez, CS, Aciar, S and Rodriguez-Morales, G (2018) Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2018-April, 1364–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, I, Moss, J, Cagan, J and Kotovsky, K (2008) The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Design Studies 29, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasconcelos, LA and Crilly, N (2016) Inspiration and fixation: questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies 42, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, SLdS, Gero, JS, Delmoral, J, Gattol, V, Fernandes, C and Fernandes, AA (2019) Comparing the design neurocognition of mechanical engineers and architects: a study of the effect of designer's domain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, Delft, The Netherlands, 5-8 August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, S, Gero, J, Gattol, V, Delmoral, J, Li, S, Cascini, G and Fernandes, A (2020) The neurophysiological activations of novice and experienced professionals when designing and problem-solving. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference 1, 1569–1578.Google Scholar
Vieira, S, Benedek, M, Gero, J, Cascini, G and Li, S (2021) Brain activity of industrial designers in constrained and open design: the effect of gender on frequency bands. Proceedings of the Design Society 1, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanathan, V and Linsey, J (2011) Understanding fixation: a study on the role of expertise. In DS 68-7: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design. Vol. 7: Human Behaviour in Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, August 15–19.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, VK and Linsey, JS (2012) Physical models and design thinking: a study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 134, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanathan, VK and Linsey, JS (2013) Design fixation and its mitigation: a study on the role of expertise. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 135, 051008, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlin, C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, SN, Lin, CT, King, JT, Liu, YC and Liang, C (2017) Learning in the visual association of novice and expert designers. Cognitive Systems Research 43, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar