Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T18:07:03.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Approach to the Significance of the “Weighted” Spear Thrower

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John L. Palter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many archaeologists continue to assume that spear thrower adjuncts were intended to serve some practical purpose related to the performance of the weapon despite the inconclusive results of the experimental use of the “weighted” spear thrower. Contrary to popular opinion, there is little evidence to substantiate the claim that atlatl weights increase the range or velocity of projectiles to any significant degree. A new approach to the problem is suggested by referring back to the original descriptions of archaeologically recovered spear throwers from the American Southwest. The fact that Basket Maker II atlatls were described as being characteristically flat in cross-section with surprisingly flexible shafts as well as reference to the former use of flexible spear throwers by A boriginal tribes of north A ustralia suggests that spear thrower adjuncts may have been intended as a means of exploiting the potential of such a weapon.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 500 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basedow, Herbert 1925 The Australian aboriginal. F. W. Preece and Sons, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Butler, Robert B., and Douglas, Osborne 1959 Archaeological evidence for the use of atlatl weights in the Northwest. American Antiquity 25:215-24.Google Scholar
Cressman, L. S., Williams, H., and Krieger, A. D. 1940 Atlatls and associated artifacts from south-central Oregon. In Early man in Oregon, archaeological studies in the northern Great Basin, University of Oregon Monographs: Studies in Anthropology 3:16-52.Google Scholar
Cushing, F. H. 1897 Exploration of ancient key dweller’s remains on the Gulf coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 35(153):329432.Google Scholar
Fenenga, Franklin, and Joe Ben, Wheat 1940 An atlatl from the Baylor Rock Shelter, Culberson County, Texas. American Antiquity 3:221-23.Google Scholar
Guernsey, Samuel James 1931 Explorations in northeastern Arizona. Pea-body Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Papers 12(1).Google Scholar
Hill, Malcolm W. 1948 The atlatl or throwing stick: a recent study of atlatls in use with darts of various sizes. Tennessee Archaeologist 4:37-44.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V., and Guernsey, S. J. 1919 Archaeological explorations in northeastern Arizona. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 65.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V., and Guernsey, S. J. 1921 Basket-Maker caves in northeastern Arizona. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Papers 8(2).Google Scholar
Mallam, R. Clark 1971 An atlatl weight from southeast Nebraska. Plains Anthropologist 16:123-24.Google Scholar
Mason, J., Alden 1928 Some unusual spear throwers of ancient America. The Museum Journal 19:290-324. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mau, Clayton 1963 Experiments with the spear thrower. The New York State Archaeological Association Bulletin 29:1-13.Google Scholar
McGregor, John C. 1965 Southwestern archaeology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Metcalf, George, and Harold, Carlson 1971 An atlatl weight from North Dakota. Plains Anthropologist 16:121-22.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John 1892 Ethnological results of the Point Barrow expedition. Bureau of American Ethnology 9th Annual Report, 1887-88, pp. 3-441.Google Scholar
Neuman, Robert 1967 Atlatl weights from certain sites on the northern and central Great Plains. American Antiquity 32:36-53.Google Scholar
Parker, Arthur C. 1917 Notes on the banner stone with some inquiries as to its purpose. New York State Museum Bulletin 196:165-76.Google Scholar
Peets, Orville H. 1960 Experiments in the use of atlatl weights. American Antiquity 26:108-10.Google Scholar
Spencer, B., and Gillen, F. J. 1899 The native tribes of central Australia. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, John 1848 Journal of a surveying voyage to the northeast coast of Australia and Torres’ Sts, in Her Maj. Schooner, Bramble, Lieut. C. B. Yule, Commander, 1842-47. Mitchell Library, MS. A1725. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Webb, William S. 1946 Indian Knoll. University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology 4(3, pt. 1).Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and David L., De Jarnette 1942 An archaeological survey of Pickwick Basin in the adjacent portions of the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 129.Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and William, G. Haag 1939 The Chiggerville shell heap in Ohio County. Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Kentucky, Publication 4(1).Google Scholar