Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:54:18.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Misuse of Projectile Point Typology in Mesoamerica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas R. Hester*
Affiliation:
Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78285

Abstract

Comments are offered on the inappropriate use of Texas-derived projectile point typology at certain Mesoamerican sites. Moholy-Nagy et al. (1984) recently applied labels to point groups from the Maya site of Tikal that are misleading in terms of the original type descriptions. Similar misuse of the Texas typology in central Mexico and in the Tehuacan Valley is noted.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bell, R. E. 1958 Guide to the Identification of Certain American Indian Projectile Points. Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Special Publication 1.Google Scholar
Bullen, R. P. 1968 A Guide to the Identification of Florida Projectile Points. Florida State Museum, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. F. 1964 Towards the Systematic Description of Chipped Stone. XXXV Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Actas y Memorias 1: 155169. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Hester, T. R. 1976 Belize Lithics: Forms and Functions. In Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, edited by Hester, T. R. and Hammond, N., pp. 1119. Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, Special Report 4.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., and Hester, T. R. 1978 Great Basin Projectile Points: Forms and Chronology. Ballena Press Publications in Archaeology, Ethnology and History 10. Socorro, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. D. 1944 The Typological Concept. American Antiquity 9: 271288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Neish, R. S. 1981 Second Annual Report of the Belize Archaic Archaeological Reconnaissance. R. S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mac Neish, R. S., Nelken-Terner, A., and Weitlaner de Johnson, I. 1967 The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, vol. 2, The Non-Ceramic Artifacts. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H. 1976 Spatial Distribution of Flint and Obsidian Artifacts at Tikal, Guatemala. In Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, edited by Hester, T. R. and Hammond, N., pp. 91108. Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, Special Report 4.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H. 1982 The Flaked Chert Industry of Tikal, Guatemala. Paper presented at the Second Maya Lithic Conference, San Antonio, Texas, October 1982.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H., Asaro, F., and Stross, F. H. 1984 Tikal Obsidian: Sources and Typology. American Antiquity 49: 104117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, H. J. 1983 The Lithic Artifacts of the Pulltrouser Area: Settlements and Fields. In Pulltrouser Swamp, Ancient Maya Habitat, Agriculture and Settlement in Northern Belize, edited by Turner, B. L. II and Harrison, P. D., pp. 212245. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, M. W. 1971 Some Lithic Assemblages of Western Zacatecas and Durango. Mesoamerican Studies 8, University Museum, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Suhm, D. A., and Jelks, E. B. 1962 Handbook of Texas Archeology: Type Descriptions. Texas Archeological Society, Special Publication 1 and Texas Memorial Museum Bulletin 4. Austin.Google Scholar
Suhm, D. A., Krieger, A. D., and Jelks, E. B. 1954 An Introductory Handbook of Texas Archeology. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 25.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1979 Archaeology. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, P. 1971 Utilitarian Artifacts of Central Mexico. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 10, edited by Ekholm, G. F. and Bernal, I., pp. 270296. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar