Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:31:56.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USE AND MULTIFACTORIAL RECONCILIATION OF UNIFACE REDUCTION MEASURES: A PILOT STUDY AT THE NOBLES POND PALEOINDIAN SITE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Michael J. Shott  and
Mark F. Seeman
Michael J. Shott*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Classical Studies, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
Mark F. Seeman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44240, USA
*
(shott@uakron.edu, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How much stone tools are reduced and their form changed from first use to discard bears upon issues such as typological integrity, curation rate, and effects of occupation span. But degree of reduction depends partly upon the measures used to gauge it. Most studies involve single indices that gauge reduction in different ways or at different scales, so results are difficult to compare between studies. In this pilot study, we compare four allometric reduction measures—one each based on length, length:thickness ratio, volume, and mass, estimated by comparing observed values in discarded tools to estimated original values—for consistency when applied to an endscraper sample from the Nobles Pond Paleoindian site in Ohio, USA. Fitted to the Weibull distribution, all measures suggest attrition compared to experimental controls, but variation among them demands reconciliation. A multifactorial method that weights individual measures by their principal-component loadings suggests attritional discard at increasing rate as reduction advances. More importantly, it addresses the growing problem of reconciling the many reduction measures in use, a major concern in this expanding research area.

El grado de reavivado de las herramientas líticas y su trayectoria morfológica entre primer uso y desecho están íntimamente relacionados con temas teóricos como la integridad tipológica, la tasa de curación y las consecuencias de la duración del periodo de ocupación. Sin embargo, el grado de reavivado también depende de las medidas empleadas para determinarlo. La mayoría de los estudios utilizan una única medida que estima la reducción de diferente manera y a diferente escala, complicando la comparación entre estudios. En este estudio piloto, comparamos el grado de consistencia de cuatros medidas alométricas—basadas respectivamente en el largo, la proporción entre largo y grosor, el volumen y la masa calculada como la diferencia entre las herramientas descartadas y una estimación de su valor original—aplicadas a una muestra de raspadores procedentes del conjunto paleoindio de Nobles Pond, Ohio, Estados Unidos. Ajustadas a la distribución Weibull, todas las medidas sugieren una tasa de desgaste considerable en comparación con los controles experimentales, pero existen variaciones entre las medidas que requieren explicación. Planteamos el uso de un método multifactorial para ponderar cada medida de reducción utilizando su peso calculado en el análisis de componentes principales. Este método sugiere que la tasa de desecho aumenta conforme avanza el proceso de reducción. De manera más importante, este método ofrece una solución al problema de cómo reconciliar las muchas medidas de reducción existentes, tarea que representa un desafío crucial en esta área de investigación creciente.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 723 - 741
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ammerman, A. J., and Feldman, Marcus W. 1974 On the “Making” of an Assemblage of Stone Tools. American Antiquity 33:610–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrefsky, William A. 2006 Experimental and Archaeological Verification of an Index of Retouch for Hafted Bifaces. American Antiquity 71:743–757.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, William A. 2006 2009 The Analysis of Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Maintenance. Journal of Archaeological Research 17:65–103.Google Scholar
Archer, Will, Schlager, Stefan, Cornel, M. Pop, Rezek, Zeljko, Dogandžić, Tamara, Desta, Dawit, Weiss, Marcel, Lin, Sam, and McPherron, Shannon 2016 Assessing Drivers of Stone Flake Variability with Geometric Morphometrics. Poster presented at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Barton, C. Michael, and Riel-Salvatore, Julien 2014 The Formation of Lithic Assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 46:334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Charlotte 1998 Projectile Point Types as Valid Chronological Units. In Unit Issues in Archaeology: Measuring Time, Space, and Material, edited by Ramenofsky, Ann and Steffen, Anastasia, pp. 21–40. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Bement, Leland C. 2014 The JS Cache: Clovis Provisioning the Southern Plains Late Pleistocene Landscape. In Clovis Caches: Recent Discoveries and New Research, edited by Bruce, B. Huckell, and Kilby, J. David, pp. 61–78. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Blades, Brooke S. 2003 End Scraper Reduction and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility. American Antiquity 68:141–156.Google Scholar
Bohush, Tatiana J. 2013 The Reduction of Experimental Paleoindian Trianguloid End Scrapers. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Andrew P., and Carr, Philip J. 1999 Examining Stage and Continuum Models of Flake Debris Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:105–116.Google Scholar
Braun, David R. 2005 Examining Flake Production Strategies: Examples from the Middle Paleolithic of Southwest Asia. Lithic Technology 30:107–125.Google Scholar
Brumm, Adam, and McLaren, Andrew 2011 Scraper Reduction and “Imposed Form” at the Lower Palaeolithic Site of High Lodge, England. Journal of Human Evolution 60:185–204.Google Scholar
Cadieux, Nicolas 2013 Size Matters: Measuring Debitage Area and Getting It Right with a Digital Scanner. Lithic Technology 38:46–70.Google Scholar
Cardillo, Marcelo, and Charlin, Judith 2009 Tendencias Observadas en la Variabilidad de los Raspadores de Norte y Sur de Patagonia: Explorando las Interrelaciones entre Forma, Tamaño y Historia de Vida. In Arqueometría Latinoamericano: Segundo Congreso Argentino y Primero Latinoamericano 2, pp. 351–359. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atomica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Chris 2002a Holocene Scraper Reduction, Technological Organization and Landuse at Ingaladdi Rockshelter, Northern Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 37:79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, Chris 2002b An Index of Invasiveness for the Measurement of Unifacial and Bifacial Retouch: A Theoretical, Experimental and Archaeological Verification. Journal of Archaeological Science 29:65–77.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Chris, and Hiscock, Peter 2011 Estimating Original Flake Mass from 3D Scans of Platform Area. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:1062–1068.Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald L., and Byrd, Bill 1994 Morphology, Function and Use Life: A Multivariate Evaluation of the Paleo Crossing Endscraper Assemblage. Paper presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar
Cornejo, B. Luis, E., and Patricio, Galarce C. 2010 C Index: Dimensioning the Expedient/Curative Continuum in Lithic Technology. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 42:393–404.Google Scholar
Cowgill, George 1989 The Concept of Diversity in Archaeological Theory. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, Robert and Jones, George T., pp. 131–141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daniel, I. Randy 1998 Hardaway Revisited: Early Archaic Settlement in the Southeast. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Daniel, I. Randy, Moore, William H., and Pritchard, James 2007 Analysis of a Paleoindian Stone Tool Assemblage from the Pasquotank Site (31PK1) in Northeastern North Carolina. Southeastern Archaeology 26: 73–90.Google Scholar
Davis, Zachary J., and Shea, John J. 1998 Quantifying Lithic Curation: An Experimental Test of Dibble and Pelcin's Original Flake-tool Mass Predictor. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:603–610.Google Scholar
Dibble, Harold L. 1987 The Interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Scraper Morphology. American Antiquity 52:109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, Harold L. 1997 Platform Variability and Flake Morphology: A Comparison of Experimental and Archaeological Data and Implications for Interpreting Prehistoric Lithic Technological Strategies. Lithic Technology 22:150–170.Google Scholar
Dibble, Harold L., and Rezek, Zeljko 2009 Introducing a New Experimental Design for Controlled Studies of Flake Formation: Results for Exterior Platform Angle, Platform Depth, Angle of Blow, Velocity, and Force. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:1945–1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogandžić, Tamana, Braun, David R., and McPherron, Shannon P. 2015 Edge Length and Surface Area of a Blank: Experimental Assessment of Measures, Size Predictions and Utility. PLoS One 10 (9):e133984.Google Scholar
Ellis, Chris, and Deller, D. Brian 2000 An Early Paleo-Indian Site Near Parkhill, Ontario. Mercury Series, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Paper 159. Canadian Museum of Civilization, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Eren, Metin 2013 The Technology of Stone Age Colonization: An Empirical, Regional-Scale Examination of Clovis Unifacial Stone Tool Reduction, Allometry, and Edge Angle from the North American Lower Great Lakes Region. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:2101–2112.Google Scholar
Eren, Metin, Dominguez-Rodrigo, Manuel, Kuhn, Stephen L., Adler, Daniel S., Le, Ian, and Bar-Yosef, Ofer 2005 Defining and Measuring Reduction in Unifacial Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:1190–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eren, Metin, and Prendergast, Mary 2007 Comparing and Synthesizing Unifacial Stone Tool Reduction Indices. In Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, edited by Andrefsky, William, pp. 49–85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gamble, Clive 1986 The Palaeolithic Settlement of Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giner, Paula J., and Sacchi, Dominique 1994 Traces d'usage et Indices de Réaffûtages et d'emmanchements sur des Grattoirs Magdaléniens de la Grotte Gazel à Sallèles-Cabardes (Aude-France). L'Anthropologie 98:427–446.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Stephen 2014 Quantifying Endscraper Reduction in the Context of Obsidian Exchange among Early Pastoralists in Southwestern Kenya. Lithic Technology 39:3–19.Google Scholar
Goodale, Nathan, Otis, Heather, Andrefsky, William, Kuijt, Ian, Finlayson, Bill, and Bart, Ken 2010 Sickle Blade Life-History and the Transition to Agriculture: An Early Neolithic Case Study from Southwest Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:1192–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, John R., and Grimes, Beth G. 1985 Flakeshavers: Morphometric, Functional and Life-Cycle Analyses of a PaleoindianUunifacial Tool Class. Archaeology of Eastern North America 13:35–57.Google Scholar
Hiscock, Peter, and Clarkson, Chris 2005 Experimental Evaluation of Kuhn's Geometric Index of Reduction and the Flat-Flake Problem. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:1015–1022.Google Scholar
Hiscock, Pete, and Tabrett, Amy 2010 Generalization, Inference and the Quantification of Lithic Reduction. World Archaeology 42:545–561.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Curtis M. 1985 Projectile Point Maintenance and Typology: Assessment with Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation. In For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, edited by Carr, Christopher, pp. 566–612. Westport, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Iovita, Radu 2010 Comparing Stone Tool Resharpening Trajectories with the Aid of Elliptical Fourier Analysis. In New Perspectives on Old Stones: Analytical Approaches to Paleolithic Technologies, edited by Lycett, Stephen and Chauhan, Parth R., pp. 235–253. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Iovita, Radu 2011 Shape Variation in Aterian Tanged Tools and the Origins of Projectile Technology: A Morphometric Perspective on Stone Tool Function. PLoS One 6 (12): e29029, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029029.Google Scholar
Iriarte, José 1995 Afinando la Puntería: Tamaño, Forma y Rejuvenecimiento en las Puntas de Proyectil Pedunculadas del Uruguay. In Arqueología en el Uruguay: 120 Años Despues, edited by Consens, Mario, Mazz, J.M. López, and Curbelo, M. del Carmen, pp. 142–151. Editorial SURCOS, Montevideo, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Kilby, J. David 2008 An Investigation of Clovis Caches: Content, Function and Technological Organization. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Stephen L. 1990 A Geometric Index of Reduction for Unifacial Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 583–593.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Stephen L. 1994 A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Mobile Toolkits. American Antiquity 59:426–442.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Stephen L., and Miller, D. Shane 2015. Artifacts as Patches: The Marginal Value Theorem and Stone Tool Life Histories. In Lithic Technological Systems and Evolutionary Theory, edited by Goodale, Nathan and Andrefsky, William, pp. 172–197. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lerner, Harry J. 2015 Dynamic Variables and the Use-Related Reduction of Huron Projectile Points. In Works in Stone: Contemporary Perspectives on Lithic Analysis edited by Shott, Michael, pp. 143–161. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Li, Hau, Kuman, Kathleen, and Li, Chaorong 2015 Quantifying the Reduction Intensity of Handaxes with 3D Technology: A Pilot Study on Handaxes in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China. PLoS One 10 (9):e0135613, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135613.Google Scholar
Loebel, Thomas J. 2013 Endscrapers, Use-wear, and Early Paleoindians in Eastern North America. In In the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition, edited by Gingerich, Joseph, pp. 315–330. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Lothrop, Jonathan C. 1988 The Organization of Paleoindian Lithic Technology at the Potts Site. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Binghamton.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. Owen, Meindl, Richard S., Mensforth, Robert B., and Barton, Thomas J. 1985 Multifactorial Determination of Skeletal Age at Death: A Method and Blind Tests of Its Accuracy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68:1–14.Google Scholar
Marshall, Sydne B. 1985 Paleoindian Artifact Form and Function at Shawnee Minisink. In Shawnee Minisink: A Stratified Paleoindian-Archaic Site in the Upper Delaware Valley of Pennsylvania, edited by McNett, Charles, pp. 165–209. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Martínez Fernández, L. 2011 Métodos de Inferencia para la Distribución Weibull: Aplicación en Fiabilidad Industrial. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Statistical Techniques, University of Vigo, Spain.Google Scholar
Méndez, Cesar A., Blanco, José F., and Quemada, Claudia 2007 Selección de Matrices e Intensidad de Uso-reavivado en los Raspadores del Valle del Chacabuco (Transecta Occidental de Patagonia Central). In Arqueología Argentina en los Inicios de un Nuevo Siglo, Vol. 1, edited by Oliva, Fernando, de Grandis, F. Nélida and Rodrigúez, Jorge, pp. 587–598. Laborde Editor, Rosario, Argentina.Google Scholar
Miller, G. Logan 2013 Illuminating Activities at Paleo Crossing (33ME274) through Microwear Analysis. Lithic Technology 38:97–108.Google Scholar
Morales, Juan I. 2016 Distribution Patterns of Stone-Tool Reduction: Establishing Frames of Reference to Approximate Occupational Features and Formation Processes in Paleolithic Societies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 41:231–245.Google Scholar
Morales, Juan I., Lorenzo, Carlos, and Vergès, Josep M. 2015 Measuring Retouch Intensity in Lithic Tools: A New Proposal Using 3D Scan Data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22:543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, Juan I., Soto, María, Lorenzo, Carlos, and Vergès, Josep M. 2015 The Evolution and Stability of Stone Tools: The Effects of Different Mobility Scenarios in Tool Reduction and Shape Features. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 3:295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Larry L., Seeman, Mark F., Summers, Garry L., Dowd, Elaine, Szafranski, Carl, Barans, Paul J., and Nilsson, Nils E. 1999 Fluted Points and Bifaces from the Nobles Pond Site: 33ST357. Ohio Archaeologist 49 (2):4–12.Google Scholar
Morrow, Juliet E. 1996 The Organization of Early Paleoindian Lithic Technology in the Confluence Region of the Mississippi, Illinois, and Missouri Rivers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Morrow, Juliet E. 1997 End Scraper Morphology and Use-life: An Approach for Studying Paleoindian Lithic Technology and Mobility. Lithic Technology 22:70–85.Google Scholar
Muller, Antoine, and Clarkson, Chris 2014 Estimating Original Flake Mass on Blades Using 3D Platform Area: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Archaeological Science 52:31–38.Google Scholar
Muñiz, Mark P. 2009 Microwear, Typology, and the Cody Component. In Hell Gap: A Stratified Paleoindian Campsite at the Edge of the Rockies, edited by Larson, Mary Lou, Kornfeld, Marcel, and Frison, George, pp. 195–215. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Nissen, Karen, and Dittemore, Margaret 1974 Ethnographic Data and Wear Pattern Analysis: A Study of Socketed Eskimo Scrapers. Tebiwa 17:67–87.Google Scholar
Patten, Bob 2005 Peoples of the Flute: A Study in Anthropolithic Forensics. Stone Dagger, Denver.Google Scholar
Pelcin, Andrew W. 1996 Controlled Experiments in the Production of Flake Attributes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pelton, Spencer R., and Boyd, Joshua 2015 A Formal Model of Endscraper Performance on Dry Bison Hide. Paper presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Quinn, Colin P., Andrefsky, William, Kuijt, Ian, and Finlayson, Bill 2008 Perforation with Stone Tools and Retouch Intensity: A Neolithic Case Study. In Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation, edited by Andrefsky, William, pp. 150–174. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ReliaSoft Corp. 2015 Life Data Analysis Reference. Tucson. Electronic document, http://reliawiki.org/index.php/Life_Data_Analysis_Reference_Book, accessed July 2, 2015.Google Scholar
Rule, Pamela, and Evans, June 1985 The Relationship of Morphological Variation to Hafting Techniques among Paleoindian Endscrapers at the Shawnee Minisink Site. In Shawnee Minisink: A Stratified Paleoindian-Archaic Site in the Upper Delaware Valley of Pennsylvania, edited by McNett, Charles, pp. 211–220. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sahle, Yonatan, and Negash, Agazi 2016 An Ethnographic Experiment of Endscraper Curation Rate among Hadiya Hideworkers, Ethiopia. Lithic Technology 40.Google Scholar
Sahle, Yonatan, Negash, Agazi, and Braun, David R. 2012 Variability in Ethnographic Hidescraper Use among the Hadiya of Ethiopia: Implications for Reduction Analysis. African Archaeological Review 29:383–397.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1994 Intercluster Lithic Patterning at Nobles Pond: A Case for “Disembedded” Procurement among Early Paleoindian Societies. American Antiquity 59:273–287.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 2005 The Nobles Pond Site, Stark County. In Ohio Archaeology, edited by Lepper, Bradley T., pp. 46–47. Orange Frazer Press, Wilmington, Ohio.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., Loebel, Thomas J., Comstock, Aaron, and Summers, Garry L 2013 Working with Wilmsen: Paleoindian End Scraper Design and Use at Nobles Pond. American Antiquity 78:407–432.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., Nilsson, Nils E., Summers, Garry L., Morris, Larry L., Barans, Paul J., Dowd, Elaine, and Newman, Margaret E. 2008 Evaluating Protein Residues on Gainey Phase Paleoindian Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:2742–2750.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., Summers, Garry L., Dowd, Elaine, and Morris, Larry L. 1994 Fluted Point Characteristics at Three Large Sites: The Implications for Modeling Early Paleoindian Settlement Patterns in Ohio. In The First Discovery of America: Archaeological Evidence of the Early Inhabitants of the Ohio Area, edited by Dancey, William, pp. 77–93. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., Summers, Garry L., Morris, Larry L., Dowd, Elaine, and Barans, Paul J. 2001 Making and Breaking End Scrapers at Nobles Pond: Modeling Variability in a Paleoindian Assemblage. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Shipton, Carol, and Clarkson, Chris 2015 Flake Scar Density and Handaxe Reduction Intensity. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 2: 169–175.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1995 How Much Is a Scraper? Curation, Use Rates, and the Formation of Scraper Assemblages. Lithic Technology 20:53–72.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1996 An Exegesis of the Curation Concept. Journal of Anthropological Research 52:259–280.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 2005 The Reduction Thesis and its Discontents: Review of Australian Approaches. In Lithics “Down Under”: Australian Perspectives on Lithic Reduction, Use and Classification, edited by Clarkson, Chris and Lamb, Lara, pp. 109–125. British Archaeological Reports International Monograph Series 1408. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 2010 Size-Dependence in Assemblage Measures: Essentialism, Materialism, and “SHE” Analysis in Archaeology. American Antiquity 75:886–906.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 2016 Survivorship Distributions in Experimental Spear Points: Implications for Tool Design and Assemblage Formation. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Stone Age Weaponry, edited by Iovita, Radu and Sano, Katsuhiro, pp. 245–258. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J., Bradbury, Andrew P., Carr, Philip J., and Odell, George H. 2000 Flake Size from Platform Attributes: Predictive and Empirical Approaches. Journal of Archaeological Science 27:877–894.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J., and Seeman, Mark F. 2015 Curation and Recycling: Estimating Paleoindian Endscraper Curation Rates at Nobles Pond, Ohio, USA. Quaternary International 361:319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J., and Sillitoe, Paul 2004 Modeling Use-Life Distributions in Archaeology using New Guinea Wola Ethnographic Data. American Antiquity 69:339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J., and Weedman, Kathryn J. 2007 Measuring Reduction in Stone Tools: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Gamo Hidescrapers from Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1016–1035.Google Scholar
Skov, Eric 2012 Adaptation of Reduction Indices to North American Assemblages: Developing a Methodology for the Investigation of the Quarry Creek Assemblage, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. Nebraska Anthropologist 27: 61–75.Google Scholar
Stevens, Nathan E., and McElreath, Richard 2015 When Are Two Tools Better Than One? Mortars, Millingslabs, and the California Acorn Economy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37:100–111.Google Scholar
Surovell, Todd A. 2009 Toward a Behavioral Ecology of Lithic Technology: Cases from Paleoindian Archaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Trustrum, K., and Jayatilaka, A. DeS. 1979 On Estimating the Weibull Modulus for a Brittle Material. Journal of Materials Science 14:1080–1084.Google Scholar
Ugan, Andrew, Bright, Jason, and Rogers, Alan 2003 When Is Technology Worth the Trouble? Journal of Archaeological Science 30:1315–1329.Google Scholar
Walthall, John A., and Holley, George R. 1997 Mobility and Hunter-Gatherer Toolkit Design: Analysis of a Dalton Lithic Cache. Southeastern Archaeology 16:152–162.Google Scholar
Weedman, Kathryn J. 2000 An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Stone Scrapers among the Gamo People of Southern Ethiopia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida Press. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jennifer K. 2007 Curation and Lithic Technological Organization Studies on the Owyhee River: A Case Study of the Chalk Basin Site (35ML143) Malheur County, Oregon. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jennifer K., and Andrefsky, William 2008 Exploring Retouch on Bifaces: Unpacking Production, Resharpening, and Hammer Type. In Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation, edited by Andrefsky, William, pp. 86–105. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shott and Seeman supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Shott and Seeman supplementary material(File)
File 809.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shott and Seeman supplementary material

Table S1

Download Shott and Seeman supplementary material(File)
File 68.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shott and Seeman supplementary material

Shott and Seeman supplementary material 1

Download Shott and Seeman supplementary material(File)
File 30.5 KB