No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Substantial doubts about this bit of British “conventional wisdom” are expressed, with long verbatim excerpts from the well-known Hakluyt Society reprints of the primary sources, in the most widely known study: Goebel, J., The Struggle for the Falkland Islands 35–42 (1927, ed. 1982)Google Scholar. Goebel may have been wrong, but a British Colonial Office Report of the 1970s is not necessarily conclusive, and the primary sources examined by Goebel are in fact still easily available. Goebel’s book is cited in many places in the chronology, and in the analysis.
2 Lindley, M. F., The Acquisition and Government of Backward Territory in International Law 51 (1926, ed. 1969)Google Scholar, quoted in Perl’s book at p. 31 n.104.
3 A satisfactory English translation is easily available in Ehler, S. & Morrall, J., Church and State Through the Centuries 155–59 (1954)Google Scholar.
4 E.g., M. F. Lindley, supra note 2.
5 Furthermore, no citation is made to the classical work on the subject by Keller, A., Lissitzyn, O. & Mann, F., Creation of Rights of Sovereignty Through Symbolic Acts, 1400–1800 (1938)Google Scholar.
6 2 R. Int’l Arb. Awards 831 (1928).