Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T19:24:02.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litigation Strategy at the International Court. A Case Study of the Nicaragua v. United States Dispute. By Terry D. Gill. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989. Pp. xv, 362. Dfl. 175; $95; £56.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Keith Highet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 400 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It should be noted that Gill's supervisors were no less than Leo Bouchez and Shabtai Rosenne, and that Gill has also coauthored the fourth edition of a handbook on the Court with Rosenne: T. GILL & S. ROSENNE, THE WORLD COURT, WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT WORKS(4th rev. ed. 1989); see the book under review at p. 119 n.151.

2 In Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (U.S. v. Italy), 1989 ICJ REP. 15 (Judgment of July 20), brought by application under the compromissory clause of a treaty, the selection of a chamber was possible only because of the close relationship of the two parties and the fact that, in spite of having been brought by application, the case in fact manifested “real consent” on both sides.

3 See Highet, Evidence, the Court, and the Nicaragua Case, 81 AJIL 1, 45-46 & n.230 (1987).