Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T21:16:03.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ming v. Marks. 367 F.Supp. 673

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 534 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 189 UNTS 150; 63 AJIL 389 (1969).

2 19 UST 6223; TIAS 6577; 63 AJIL 385 (1969). The Protocol incorporates Articles 2 through 34 of the Convention. Article 1(A)(2) of the Convention which defines “refugee” is incorporated in Article I of the Protocol with the omission of any time limit. Article 32(1) provides: “The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order.”

3 367 F.Supp. 673, 677.

4 38 Fed. Reg. 8238 (1973) (cited by Court).

5 367 F.Supp. 673, 680.

6 Ibid., 681.