Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:35:18.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Maritime Organization Approves U.S.–Canadian Proposal for Strengthened Controls on Air Pollution from Ships in North American Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 287 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, Nov. 2, 1973,1340 UNTS 184, as modified by Protocol, Feb. 17, 1978, 1340 UNTS 61. MARPOL Annex VI deals with prevention of air pollution from ships. See http://www.imo.org/Conventions/contents.asp?doc_id=678&topic_id=258#11.

2 Juliet, Eilperin Ships Near U.S., Canada May Be Subject to New Controls , Wash. Post, Mar. 29, 2010, at A8. On the existing IMO air pollution standards for ships, see http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/inter/imo.php.Google Scholar

3 Cornelia, Dean U.S. Seeks to Reduce Emissions from Ships in Coastal Areas , N.Y. Times, Mar. 31, 2009 Google Scholar; Juliet, Eilperin U.S., Canada Propose Pollution Control Zones for Ports, Wash. Post, Mar. 31, 2009.Google Scholar

4 Kari, Lydersen & Juliet, Eilperin EPA Proposal to Cut Great Lakes Ship Emissions Stirs the Waters , Wash. Post, Oct. 23, 2009, at A6.Google Scholar

5 [Editor’s Note: The IMO action was, in fact, an amendment to an optional technical annex of the MARPOL Convention, made pursuant to a specialized amendment process for such annexes authorized by Article 16 of the Convention.]

6 EPA Fact Sheet EPA-420-F-10-015, Designation of North American Emission Control Area to Reduce Emissions from Ships: Regulatory Announcement (Mar. 2010) (footnote and heading omitted), at http://www.epa.gov/oms/regs/nonroad/marine/ci/420f10015.htm.Google Scholar

7 EPA Press Release, IMO Adopts Proposal for Emission Control Area/Move Safeguards Health of Port Communities and Those Beyond (Mar. 26, 2010), at http://www.epa.gov/newsroom/newsreleases.htm.Google Scholar

8 Public L. No. 110-280, 122 Stat. 2611 (2008).