Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T23:10:24.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of the Term “High Contracting Parties” in the Air Traffic Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Arthur K. Kuhn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1941 , pp. 132 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1941

References

1 Philippson v. Imperial Airways, Ltd., [1939] A. C. 332; 108 L.J.K.B. 415; this Journal, Vol. 33 (1939), p. 588; Lord Atkin, Lord Thankerton and Lord Wright for reversal, Lord Russell of Killowen and Lord Macmillan dissenting. The judgments of the courts below are reported in (1937) 53 T.L.R. 850 and (1938) 54 T.L.R. 523, respectively.

2 For text of convention, see Supplement to this Journal, Vol. 28 (1934), p. 84.

3 L. Oppenheim, International Law (5th ed., 1937), §510, p. 711.

4 Supplement to this Journal, Vol. 29 (1935), p. 661.