No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
One Mexican historian has described the post-war years of Benito Juárez' Administration (1867-72) in Mexico and that of his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada (1872-76) as “a dictatorship without peace or progress.” The nation suffered from a breakdown in public order and morality; misery, anarchy and banditry were widespread. Indian uprisings occurred in Yucatán, Chiapas, Durango, Chihuahua, Nuevo León and Coahuila. Insurrections against the government of Juárez broke out in Tamaulipas, Puebla, Sinaloa, Jalisco, Guerrero; and conflicts between candidates for the government in Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and San Luis Potosi destroyed the public order. The causes of this breakdown in commonweal may be attributed to the long history of civil war in Mexico, the inadequacy of governmental institutions and lack of respect for a Constitution (1857) which incorporated many injustices within its Liberal framework. An important cause of recurring revolt was the presidential ambition of Juárez and his conflicts with Congress and the Supreme Court. His suspension of the Constitutional guarantees, by decree of January 17, 1870, and his dictatorial use of extraordinary powers brought much resentment; and, in the election of 1870, the Constitutional Party (Liberal) supported Porifirio Díaz against Juárez. Through a “reform” of the electoral law, Benito Juárez was able to gain a plurality. He was only exceeded in his autocratic use of power by his successor, Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada who vigorously enforced the Reform Laws that made of the anti-Church program a Lerdist kulturkampf. It was during a year of Juárez' Administration that Brevet Major General William S. Rosecrans served as Envoy Extraordinary & Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States to Mexico. Officially he held this post from July 27, 1968 to June 26, 1869. The American Minister spoke bluntly in criticism of the Juárez Administration, and of Lerdo de Tejada who was then President of the Supreme Court, a position equivalent to the Vice-presidency.
1 Ugarte, José Bravo, Historia de Mexico, (México, 1944, Jus, vol. 3), 353–59.Google Scholar
2 Congr. Globe, 38 Congr., 1 sess., p. 1408.
3 Zorrilla, Luis G., Historia de las Relaciones entre Mexico y los Estados Unidos de America, 1800–1958, Mexico, 1965,Google Scholar Edit. Porrua, I, 471. In this passage, Zorrilla quotes from Fred Rippy, J., The United States and Mexico, (N.Y., 1931, Crofts), 278.Google Scholar
4 National Archives, United States, Wash., D.C. (hereafter, NAUS), Plumb to Seward, Jan. 11, 24, 28; Apr. 21, 1868.
5 NAUS, Plumb to Seward, Mar. 28; Apr. 14, 23; May 23, 1868.
6 NAUS, Plumb to Seward, June 12, 19; Sept. 10; July 17, 1868.
7 NAUS, Plumb to Seward, Oct. 2, 8, 22, 1868.
8 NAUS, Seward to Plumb, May 23, Jul. 8; Sept. 17; Oct. 15, 1868.
9 Morison, S.E. & Commager, H.S., The Growth of the American Republic, N.Y., 1962, Oxford, vol. 1, 769–70.Google Scholar
10 NAUS, Seward to Rosecrans, Sept. 29; Dec. 17, 1868. Plumb to Seward, Nov. 20; Dec. 3, 1868.
11 NAUS, Seward to Rosecrans, Dec. 17, 1868. Rosecrans to Seward, Dec. 10, 24, 29, 1868.
12 NAUS, Seward to Rosecrans, Jan. 2; Feb. 24, 26, 1869.
13 Dunn, Frederick S., The Diplomatic Protection of Americans in Mexico, N.Y., 1933, 95–100.Google Scholar Dunn was at one time Ass't Solicitor of the Dept. of State, and a member of the U. S.-Mexican Claims Commission.
14 NAUS, Rosecrans to Seward, Jan. 10; Feb. 8, 1869.
15 NAUS, Rosecrans to Seward, Feb. 10, 16, 28, 1869. Emphasis added.
16 NAUS, Rosecrans to Seward, Mar. 3, 22, 28, 1869. The current claims of British bondholders were set at $81,574,830. Emphasis added.
17 NAUS, Rosecrans to Secretary of State, Mar. 22, 28; Apr. 10, 11; May 10, 1869. Also, Dunn, Dipl. Prot., 100–105.
18 Dunn, Dipl. Prot., 100–105. Also, NAUS, Nelson to Fish, Jun. 30; July 20, 29, 1869.
19 NAUS, Nelson to Fish, May 1, 17, 31, 1873.