Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2015
The study of the first decade of the Republic permits one to reflect on the numerous myths that permeate Brazil's history. These myths have served to reduce social conflict and to provide ideological foundations for the holders of power. In particular, examination of the 1890s challenges the commonly accepted notion of the peaceful character of the Brazilian historical process and the myth of consensus. The roots of these traditions, according to Henry Keith, date from the viceregal period. But the republicans were particularly active in reinforcing it by exalting the bloodless character of the change of regime in 1889. “Revolution without blood” the politicians Martim Francisco Ribeiro de Andrada of São Paulo and Karl von Koseritz of Rio Grande do Sul would say. The Correio Mercantil of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul agreed; the country had witnessed a “marvelous political change that Brazil brought about instantaneously without shedding a drop of blood, without firing a single bullet.”
1 Keith, Henry, “A tradição Não violenta na Història do Brazil: mito que precisa ser demolido?” in Keith, and Edwards, S.F., Conflito e continuidades na sociedades brasileira (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1970)Google Scholar
2 Martim Francisco Ribeiro de Andrada was the third of the same name in the Andrada Family whose role in the Independence of Brazil was fundamental. Von Koseritz was a traveling German who lived in Rio Grande do Sul where he practiced journalism.
3 Quoted in de Campos, M.E. Porto, Apontamentos para a História da República dos Estados Unidos do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1890), p. 487.Google Scholar
4 The revolt of the Navy was the last great response to the government of Floriano Peixoto. Led by Admiral Custódio de Melo who had the ambition to be president, it began on September 6, 1893 and was defeated in March of the following year.
5 See M.E. Porto de Campos, p. 386.
6 O Jacobino, June 26, 1897.
7 O Estado de São Paulo, March 13, 1896, p. 2.
8 See Anais da Câmara dos Diputados, sessão de July 8, 1893, Speech of Deputy Bellarmino de Mendonça, p. 137.
9 Pompeia, Raul, O Estado de São Paulo, April 28, 1893, p. 1.Google Scholar
10 In the Imperial Parliament there were a large number of Bachelors of Laws. It was thus to the legislators that the Jacobins were referring.
11 O Nacional, August 7, 1895.
12 Luis Edmundo, pp. 1027–28.
13 Anais da Câmara dos Deputados, session of July 17, 1891, p. 409.
14 A República (Bananal) May 31, 1896, p. 1
15 O Jacobino, September 13, 1894.
16 O Jacobino, September 13, 1894.
17 O Jacobino, April 30, 1895.
18 de Holanda, Sérgio Buarque, Do Impèrio República, vol. 7 of the Història Geral da Civilização Brasileira, (São Paulo: Difel, 1972).Google Scholar
19 Anais da Câmara dos Deputados, session of July 11, 1895, p. 73 (Speech of Augusto Montenegro).
20 O Jacobino, October 10, 1894.
21 See Maison, Adalberto, A ideologia nacionalista em Alberto Torres (São Paulo: Livraria Duas Cidades, 1979).Google Scholar
22 “We desire nothing from Europe, we only wish for distance. The fraternity which a greedy and grasping Europe can desire with we Brazilians and we of the American continent, we already know for what it is …”, O Jacobino, May 29, 1897.
23 Décio Saes, , Classe Média e politica na Primeira República Brasileira (1889–1930), (Petrópolis: Vozes, 1975).Google Scholar
24 Anais do Senado, Session of October 22, 1892, p. 66.
25 O Jacobino, November 14, 1894.
26 “The national peril falls on the fact that all our credit, all our commercial life rests in foreign hands.” O Jacobino, September 29, 1894.
27 Vilela, Luz Nicia, A luta pela industrialização no Brasil (São Paulo: Alfa-Omega, 1975).Google Scholar
28 Peixoto, Silveira, A tormenta que Prudente de Moráis venceu (Curitiba: Ed. Guaira, 1942), p. 123.Google Scholar
29 “Those segments of the urban population not possessing capital that perform predominantly non-manual labor, whether working for themselves or selling their labor to third parties.” Decio Saes, p. 26.
30 Lopes, Juarez Brandão Desenvolvimento e mudança social (São Paulo: Editora Nacional, 1972)Google Scholar
31 Hahner, June, “Jacobins versus galegos. Urban Radicals versus Portuguese Immigrants in Rio de Janeiro in 1890.” Reprint from the Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 18:2 (May 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 O Jacobino, July 4, 1896.
33 Anais da Câmara dos Deputados, session of September 12, 1896, p. 242.
34 O Jacobino, April 17, 1897.
35 Taunay, A.E., Impèrio e República (São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 1947), p. 26.Google Scholar
36 See Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, p. 342.
37 de Carvalho, José Murilo, “As forças Armadas na Primeira República: o poder destabilizador,” in Història Geral da Civilização Brasileira vol. 9 (São Paulo: Difel, 1977).Google Scholar
38 Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, p. 346.
39 Anais do Senado, Session of September 17, 1896, p. 37.
40 Ibid., session of June 12, 1895, p. 302 (speech of Senator Almino Afonso).
41 Weffort, Francisco Corrêa, “Estado e Massas no Brasil”, Civilização Brasileira, 7(May 1966), pp. 140–141.Google Scholar
42 D’Atri, A., O Estado de São Paulo, May 31, 1895.Google Scholar
43 O Estado de São Paulo, May 30, 1897.
44 Castro, Sertório, A República que a revolução destruiu (Rio de Janeiro: Freitas Bastos, 1933), pp. 119–20.Google Scholar
45 Fleiuss, Max, Jornal do Comércio, December 25, 1928.Google Scholar
46 Anais da Câmara dos Deputados, session of November 23, 1897, p. 3.
47 Edmundo, Luis, O Rio de Janeiro do meu tempo (Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1933), vol. 3, p. 1031.Google Scholar
48 The Italian government decided to ask for compensation for damages caused to its citizens during the civil wars of the first republican years. Prudente listened and the agreements were signed in December 1895 and February 1896 authorizing the expenditures necessary to execute the accords.
49 Anais do Senado, session of August 24, 1896, p. 127.
50 O Estado de São Paulo, March 9, 1897, p. 1.
51 O Estado de São Paulo, March 10, 1897.