No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comportamento della ossificazione nei gemelli nel periodo neonatale
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2014
Summary
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Skeleton X-rays of 27 twin — pairs (12 monochorial and 15 bichorial) have been examined. Differences in osseous development between the two fetuses are not relevant, but may be found with the same frequency both in omologous and heterologous pairs. The Authors finally discuss the factors (which may be different, according to the type of twin pregnancy) possibly producing variations in the skeletal apparatus.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1961 , pp. 331 - 339
- Copyright
- Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1961
References
Bibliografia
1.
Bardy, J.: De la variabilité des points d'ossification du foetus; son importance en médicine légale et pour l'étude de la superfétation. Thèse de Paris
1928.Google Scholar
2.
Bergamaschi, P.: Contributo radiologico allo studio della post-maturità neonatale. Scritti Ost. e Ginecol., 12, 228, 1958–1959.Google Scholar
3.
Bergamaschi, P. e Coucourde, F.: Studio radiologico dello sviluppo osseo fetale. La Radiol. Med., 46, 898
1960.Google Scholar
4.
Bouchacourt, , et Cathala, V.: Un cas de grossesse gémellaire pouvant faire croire à la superfétation. — Bull. Soc. Obst. de Paris, 18, 6, 1906.Google Scholar
5.
Cathala, V. et Bardy, J.: L'âge d'un foetus peut-il être fixé par le degré de développement de son ossification? Etude basée sur la recherche des points d'ossification chez les jumeaux univitellins. Bull, de la Soc. d'Obst. et de Gynéc. de Paris, 17, 601, 1928.Google Scholar
7.
Cope, I. and Murdoch, D.: The estimation of foetal maturity. J. Obst. Gynaecol. Br. Emp., 65, 56, 1958.Google Scholar
8.
Corinaldesi, F. e Giardina, B.: Rilievi radiologici sui nuclei di ossificazione dei nati gemelli. Comunicaz. alla 24a Riunione dei radiol. emiliani, 18-III-1934. Pubblicata in Radiol. e Fis. Med., I, 225, 1934.Google Scholar
9.
De Toni, E. Jr.: Può servire la ricerca radiologica del nucleo di Béclard alla diagnosi differenziale fra prematuri e deboli congeniti?
Il Lattante, 26, 516, 1955.Google Scholar
11.
Jardin, R.: Diagnostic de la superfétation basée sur la radiographie. — Bull. de la Soc. d'Obst. et de Gynéc., 14, 444, 1925.Google Scholar
12.
Jardin, R.: Etude anatomique et radiologique des points d'ossification du genou chez le nouveau-né. — Gynécol. et Obstetr., 14, 240, 1926.Google Scholar
13.
Maggipinto, B. e Orlandini, I.: La vascolarizzazione arteriosa della placenta umana. Atlante anatomoradiografico. Ed. Cappelli, Bologna
1955.Google Scholar
15.
Muratore, A. e Bernardi, A.: I nuclei di ossificazione nei gemelli. Riv. di Clin. Ped., 65, 118, 1961.Google Scholar
16.
Robecchi, E.: La maturità fetale. Valore clinico e medicolegale dei nuclei di ossificazione del ginocchio. Boll. Soc. Piem. di Ost. e Ginec., 2, fasc. 3, 1934. Estratto.Google Scholar
17.
Rouvier, , et Laffont, : Un cas de superfétation apparente. Bull. Soc. Obst. et Gynéc.
de Paris, pag. 89, 1912.Google Scholar
18.
Schvaab, : A propos de la superfétation. Diagnostic basé sur la radiographie. Pr. Méd., 15 09
1920.Google Scholar
19.
Turpin, , e Tisserand, M.: Les mobiles héréditaires du développement physique. Nutrition, 8, 3, 1938.Google Scholar
You have
Access