Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:31:26.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Demographic Characteristics of Multiple Births in Hungary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Andrew Czeizel*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health and Central Statistical Office, Budapest
George Acsádi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health and Central Statistical Office, Budapest
*
National Institute of Public Health and Central Statistical Office, Gyali Ut. 2-6, Budapest IX, Hungary

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Hungary the frequency of multiple births has been decreasing. In 1920 the rate of multiple births was 23-5‰; by 1968 this rate decreased to 18.2‰, i.e., only 77% of the 1920 data. The male preponderance in twin births is lower than in single births, and in triplets actually a female excess can be observed. Furthermore, it can be observed that there are more boys than girls among the first-born of multiple births. The average birth weight of liveborn and stillborn twins, and of liveborn triplets is 2101 g, 1458 g, and 1723 g respectively. The ratio of MZ to DZ twins is about 30:70 in 1968. The frequency of DZ twin births increases with maternal age (the peak is now over 40 years) and birth order. According to the 1959, i960, and 1968 figures, both DZ and MZ twin births were significantly more frequent in mothers aged 16 or less than in mothers aged 17-19 years.

This demographic survey belonged to preparatory works connected with the setting up of the Budapest Twin Register which came into force on January 1st, 1970.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1971

References

Bertillon, J. (1898). La gémellité selon l'äge de la mère et le rang chronologique de l'accouchement. J. Soc. Stat. Paris, 39: 146149.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. (1959). The effect of parental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Ann. Hum. Genet., 23: 454458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M. G. (1960). The twinning rate in Europe and Africa. Ann. Hum. Genet., 24: 121125.Google Scholar
Czeizel, A., Tusnadi, G., Domäny, Z. (1969). Genetic aspects of the demographic consequences of family planning. Orv. Hetil., 110: 29933000.Google ScholarPubMed
Enders, T., Stern, C. (1948). The frequencies of twins, relative to age of mothers, in American populations. Genetics, 33: 263268.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A. W., Fellman, J. (1967a). Twinning and legitimacy. Hereditas (Lund), 57: 395402.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A. W., Fellman, J. (1967b). Twinning in relation to the marital status of the mother. Acta Genet., (Basel), 17: 385398.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1961). Twins in History and Science. Charles C. Thomas Publ., Springfield,Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Brenci, G. (1968). Fertility and multiple births. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 17: 417427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellin, D. (1895). Die Ursache der Multiparität der Unipaaren Tiere überhaupt und der Zwillingsschwangerschaft beim Menschen. München. Cit. L. Gedda, 1961.Google Scholar
Heuser, R. L. (1967). Multiple births. US 1964 Vital Health Statistics. Series 21, No. 14. US National Center for Health Statistics, Washington.Google Scholar
McArthur, N. (1954). The relative aetiological effect of maternal age and parity in binovular twinning. Ann. Eugen., 18: 203210.Google Scholar
Shipley, P. W. (1967). Frequency of twinning in California. Its relationship to maternal age, parity and race. Amer. J. Epidem, 85: 147156.Google Scholar
Strandskov, H. H., Edelen, E. W. (1946). Monozygotic and dizygotic twin birth frequency in the total, the “white” and the “colored” US populations. Genetics, 31: 438446.Google Scholar
Susanne, C., Corbisier, J. V. (1969). Twin births in Belgium (1960-1961). Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 18: 294320.Google Scholar
United Nations (1966). Demographic Yearbook 1965. New York.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. A. H. (1950). Twinning twin pedigrees. Brit. J. Soc. Prev. Med., 4: 197216.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1901). Beitrage zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflueger. Arch., 88: 346430.Google Scholar