Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:35:36.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innate Abilities, One or Many?* A New Method and Some Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Steven G. Vandenberg
Steven G. Vandenberg*
Affiliation:
University of Louisville Twin Study, Louisville, Ky. (U. S. A.)

Summary and concluding remarks

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A generalization of the F test is proposed to see how many independent components are statistically significant when the co-variances between DZ twin differences on several psychological tests are compared with similar co-variances for MZ twins. When applied to the 6 scores of Thurstone's Primary Mental Abilities test battery, at least 4 separate components were found to be significant independently. Then 4 components are tentatively identified as similar to, although not identical with, the Number, Verbal, Space and Word fluency scores. While the procedure bears some resemblance to factor analysis, it may lead to quite different results since it is based on the comparison of two co-variance matrices of twin differences.

In conclusion, it should be kept in mind that these results are based on small samples of MZ and DZ twins, so that a repetition of the study seems indicated. This replication is now in progress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 41 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1965

Footnotes

*

Acknowledgments. This report is based on data obtained in the Hereditary Abilities Study of the Institute of Human Biology of the University of Michigan of which Lee R. Dice was the principal investigator. The study was supported by McGregor Fund of Detroit and by grant M-1045 of the National Institute of Mental Health. The help of Mrs. Kathryn Goode and of the staff of the University of Michigan Computing Laboratory is gratefully acknowledged in obtaining the covariance matrices. For the solution of the characteristic equations I am indebted to Charles Wrigley and Peter Hemingway of Michigan State University and to MISTIC. Support while writing the paper was received from NIH grants RG-5527, M-6203 and MH-07033-01 and National Science Foundation grant GB-466.

While I am solely responsible for the ideas in this paper, I have profited from correspondence or discussions with Drs. Batschelet, Dempster, Dwyer, Hotelling, Lawley, Lubin, Tucker, Tukey and others.

References

Bartlett, M. S.: Tests of significance in factor analysis. Brit. J. Stat. Psychol., 3: 77–85, 1950.Google Scholar
French, J. W.: The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monograph 5, University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P.: The structure of intellect. Psychol. Bull., 55: 287–293, 1956.Google Scholar
Loevinger, Jane: Theories of intelligence. In Helson, H. Ed. Theoretical foundations of psychology, New York, Van Nostrand, 1951.Google Scholar
Sutton, H. E., Clark, P. J., Schull, W. J.: The use of multi-allele genetic characters in the diagnosis of twin zygosity. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 7: 180–188, 1955.Google Scholar
Sutton, H. E., Vandenberg, S. C., Clark, P. J.: The hereditary abilities study: selection of twins, diagnosis of zygosity and program of measurements. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 14: 52–63, 1962.Google ScholarPubMed
Thurstone, L. L.: The primary mental abilities tests. Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1941.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S. G.: The hereditary abilities study: hereditary components in a psychological test battery. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 14: 220–237 Google Scholar