Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:58:56.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Intrauterine Growth of the Biparietal Diameter of Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Per-Håkan Persson
Affiliation:
Diagnostic Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Lars Grennert
Affiliation:
Diagnostic Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A series of 978 repeated ultrasonic measurements of the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) assessed the growth of 119 twin pairs during the second half of pregnancy. The mean BPD values for each gestational week were close to the mean values for singletons. From the 32nd week, the BPD growth curves for twins deviated from that for singletons. The second twins' growth curve ran consistently below that of the first and fell away more from the 32nd week on. In 80% of the measurements, the first twin (defined as the twin in, or close to, the pelvic inlet) was the one with the largest BPD. The intrapair difference in BPD had no correlation to the intrapair difference in body length, head circumference, or birth weight. In 91 of the 119 twin pairs, zygosity was settled by sex, histological examination of placenta, or blood grouping. The longitudinally compiled BPD growth curves (678 BPD determinations) showed the curve for dizygotic twins consistently running above that of the monozygotic twins. The BPD differences between the first and the second twin remained also within mono- and dizygotic groups of twins.

Type
Session II: Pathophysiology of Twin Pregnancy
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1. Campbell, S (1968): An improved method of fetal cephalometry by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 75:568.Google Scholar
2. Daw, E (1975): Biological aspects of twin pregnancy in Dundee. Br J Obstet Gynecol 82:29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Gennser, G, Ohrlander, S, Eneroth, P (1977): Fetal Cortisol and the initiation of labour in the human. The Fetus and Birth, Ciba Foundation Symposium 47:401.Google Scholar
4. Grennert, L, Persson, PH, Gennser, G, Gullberg, B (1979): Zygocity and intrauterine BPD growth of twins, (in preparation).Google Scholar
5. Gruenwald, P (1970): Environmental influences on twins apparent at birth. A preliminary study. Biol Neonate 15:79.Google Scholar
6. Göttlicher, S, Modjaric, J, Krone, HA (1977): Der biparietale Dürchmesser des fetalen Kopfes bei Zwillingen und Einlingen im Verlauf der Schwangerschaft. Eine vergleichende Studie. Geburshilfe Frauen-heilkd 37:762.Google Scholar
7. Lubchenco, LO, Hansman, C, Dressler, M, Boyd, E (1963): Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 32:793.Google Scholar
8. Maršál, K, Gennser, G, Kullander, S (1978): Breathing movements and fetal presentation. Obstet Gynecol 51:162.Google Scholar
9. McKeown, T, Record, RG (1952): Observations on fetal growth in multiple pregnancy in man. J Endocrinol 8:386.Google Scholar
10. Naeye, RL, Benirschke, K, Hagstrom, JWC, Marcus, CC (1966): Intrauterine growth of twins as estimated from liveborn birth weight data. Pediatrics 37:409.Google Scholar
11. Rausen, AR, Seki, M, Strauss, L (1965): Twin transfusion syndrome. J Pediatr 66:613.Google Scholar
12. Schlensker, K-H, Tan, HS (1974): Zur Aussagefähigkeit der Ultraschalluntersuchung bei Zwillingschwangerschaft. Perinat Med 5:98.Google Scholar
13. Walker, NF (1957): Determination of the zygocity of twins. Acta Genet 7:33.Google Scholar
14. Weller, PH, Jenkins, PA, Gupta, J, Baum, JD (1976): Pharyngeal lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios in newborn infants. Lancet 1:12.Google Scholar