Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T09:53:12.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal Age and Parity as Predictors of Human Twinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

B. Bønnelykke*
Affiliation:
The Cytogenetic Laboratory, Aarhus Psychiatric Hospital, Risskov, Denmark
*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vest-Agder Sentralsykehus, N-4633 Kristiansand, Norway

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the association between maternal age and parity and dizygotic (DZ) and monozygotic (MZ) twinning, respectively. Mothers of all twins born alive in Denmark in 1984 or 1985 were included into the study as cases, and a random sample of mothers of singletons were controls. Data on maternal age at delivery and number of previous births were collected from the Danish Medical Birth Register. By means of logistic regression analysis, a significant and positive association was found betwen maternal age and DZ twinning, and a significant and negative association between parity and MZ twinning. No association was found for parity and DZ twinning, nor for maternal age and MZ twinning. The study suggests that human MZ twinning has predictors too, as has DZ twinning. The finding has implications for zygosity classification in future twin research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, G (1978): The parity effect and fertility in mothers of twins. In Nance, WE (ed): Twin Research. Part B: Biology and Epidemiology. New York: Alan R Liss, p 89.Google Scholar
2.Bishop, YMM, Feinberg, SE, Holland, PW (1975): Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
3.Bulmer, MG (1959): The effect of parental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Ann Hum Genet 23:454458.Google Scholar
4.Bønnelykke, B, Hauge, M, Holm, N, Kristoffersen, K, Gurtler, H (1989): Evaluation of zygosity diagnosis in twin pairs below age seven by means of a mailed questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 38:305313.Google Scholar
5.Dahlberg, G (1926): Twin births and twins from a heriditary point of view. Stockhom: AB Tidens Trykeri.Google Scholar
6.Duncan, JM (1865): On the comparative frequency of twin-bearing in different pregnancies. Edinburgh Med 101:928929.Google Scholar
7.Eriksson, AW, Fellman, J (1967): Twinning in relation to the marital status of the mother. Acta Genet Stat Med 17:385398.Google Scholar
8.Gedda, L (1961): Twins in History and Science. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
9.Hémon, D, Berger, C, Lazar, P (1979): The etiology of human dizygotic twinning with special reference to spontaneous abortions. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:253258.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Lamy, M, Fréyal, J, Grouchy, De, Chryssostomidou, M (1955): L‘age maternel et le rang de naissance dans un échantillon de jumeaux. Acta Genet Stat Med 5:403419.Google Scholar
11.Lazar, P, Berger, C, Hémon, D (1981): Preconceptional prediction of twin pregnancies. In Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds): Twin Research 3. Part A: Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R Liss, p 175181.Google Scholar
12.Nylander, PPS (1981): The factors that influence twinning rates. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 30:189194.Google ScholarPubMed