Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:15:07.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on Twins I. Typhoid Favours Cotwins1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

H. K. Goswami
H. K. Goswami*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Botany, Govt. Degree College, Narsinghgarh

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The experimental cotwin control method by means of 34 MZ pairs, of which only one cotwin of each pair suffered from typhoid disease, offered excellent opportunities to study the after effects of typhoid incidence on the anthropometric, mental and physical traits of individuals. Comparison among 56 MZ pairs reveals that typhoid brings out certain significant changes in these traits.

Increase of intelligence has already been shown, due to increased quantity of RNA. Whether or not typhoid incidence after a period of approximately 7 months influences the rapid synthesis of RNA would be a good field of biochemical investigation of immunogenetical interest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 402 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1967

Footnotes

1

Greater part was worked out at Govt. Higher Secondary School Agar (M.P.)

References

Dencker, S. J. (1958). A follow up study of 128 closed head injuries in twins using cotwins as controls. Acta Psychiat. (Suppl.), 123.Google Scholar
Friberg, L. et al. (1959). Smoking habits of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Brit. Med. J., 1: 1090–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gedda, L. (1960). Sports and genetics. A study on twins (351 pairs). A.Ge.Me.Ge., 9: 387–406.Google Scholar
Gedda, L. (1961). Genetica clinica. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 10: 389.Google Scholar
Henry, E. R. (1901). Classification and Uses of Finger Prints. London.Google Scholar
Holt, S. B. (1954). Genetics of dermal ridges: bilateral asymmetry in finger ridge counts. Ann. Eugen. London, 18: 211.Google ScholarPubMed
Hyden, H., Egyhazi, E. (1964). Changes in RNA content and base composition in cortical neurons of rats in a learning experiment involving transfer of handedness. Proc. N.A.S., 52, 4: 1030–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, E. (1956). A review on the zygosity diagnosis of twins. Jap. J. Hum. Genet., 1: 24–31.Google Scholar
Kaij, L. (1956). Drinking habits in twins. Acta. Genet. (Basel), 7: 437.Google Scholar
Newman, H. H. et al. (1937). A Study of Heredity and Environment. Chicago.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (1954). The distal triradius ‘t’ on the hands of parents and sibs of mongol imbeciles. Ann. Hum. Genet. London, 19: 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, C. (1960). Principles of Human Genetics. University of California, N. Y. Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Penrose, L. S. (1955). Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. Hum. Genet. London., 19, 4: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stocks, P. (1930). A biometrie investigation of twins and their brothers and sisters. Ann. Eugen. London, 4: 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
W.H.O. (1966). The use of twins in epidemiological studies. A.Ge.Me.Ge., 15: 109–128.Google Scholar