Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:24:40.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mycenaean cultural impact on the Çine (Marsyas) plain, southwest Anatolia: the evidence from Çine-Tepecik

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Sevinç Günel
Sevinç Günel
Affiliation:
University of Hacettepe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tepecik is situated in the province of Aydın, on the edge of the Çine valley that forms the southern branch of the Maeander river system. It is located on a mountain pass extending towards the south, as well as on a natural passageway through the mountain range on the western side of the Çine plain. Its location on a number of natural routes is reflected in the material culture of the site, which displays both local (western Anatolian) and Aegean elements. The Late Bronze Age cultural remains from Çine-Tepecik include a group of Mycenaean pottery, presented and assessed in this study, that can be dated to the LH III B1 to LH III C period (ca. 1320/1300–1190/1090 BC) based on decorative style and typology. Both the locally produced and imported Mycenaean ceramics at Çine-Tepecik reflect characteristic vessel forms and decorative elements of Mycenaean decorated pottery. In particular, the motifs used in the decoration of the vessels resemble those of the later phases of the Mycenaean decorative style and exemplify the decorated pottery tradition of the period. The later phases of Mycenaean culture are noteworthy for the distribution of the culture across a wide area, including the eastern Aegean islands and the coastal region of western Anatolia. The Mycenaean finds from Çine-Tepecik demand a re-evaluation and an extension of the Mycenaean cultural sphere in this period to include Çine (Marsyas).

Özet

Aydın bölgesinde Büyük Menderes'in güney kollarından Çine Çayı kenarında yer alan Çine-Tepecik, bir taraftan güneye uzanan doğal geçit üzerinde diğer taraftan ise, Çine ovasının batısında, dağ sıraları arasında oluşturduğu doğal yol üzerindeki konumu ile bölgeye öozgü ve aynı zamanda Ege bölgesi ile ilişkileri yansıtan bir kültürel yapıya ışık tutmaktadır. Çine-Tepecik Geç Tunç Çağı kültür tabakasına ait kalıtıntılar ve bu çalışmada ele alınan bir grup Miken seramiği form ve bezeme stili açısından, LH III B1–LH III C dönemlerini (ca. 1320/1300–1190/1090) kapsayan bir kronolojik gelişim göstermiştir. Çine-Tepecik Miken buluntuları arasında yerli ve ithal malzeme grubunu veren bu kaplar, Miken seramik gelişiminden tanınan karakteristik kap formu ve bezeme biçimini yansıtmaktadır. Özellikle kaplar üzerine uygulanan motifler, Ege'de Miken kültürü son evrelerinin bezeme biçimini oluşturmakta ve aynı zamanda M.Ö. 1. Binyılı başına değin takip edilebilen süsleme geleneğini göstermektedir. Miken kültürünün son evreleri, Ege coğrafyasında Doğu Ege adaları ve Batı Anadolu'nun kıyı şeridini kapsayan bir dağılım alanı ile dikkati çekmiştir. Ancak Çine ovasındaki konumu ile Çine-Tepecik Miken buluntuları, bu coğrafi sınırın, Çine (Marsyas) bölgesini de kapsayan bir yayılım alanında değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 60 , December 2010 , pp. 25 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akdeniz, E. 2006: ‘A new excavation in western Anatolia: Kadıkalesi (ancient Anaia). A preliminary report for prehistoric-protohistoric results 2001–2005’ OLBA 13: 1–33Google Scholar
Benter, M. 2006: ‘Milas’daki Pilavtepe Miken Oda Mezarı’ in Rumscheid, F. (ed.), Die Karer und die Anderen. Internationales Kolloquium an der Freien Universität Berlin (13 bis 15 Oktober 2005). Berlin: 1–6Google Scholar
Benton, S., Waterhouse, H. 1973: ‘Excavations in Ithaca: Tris Langadas’ The Annual of the British School at Athens 68: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzi, M. 1985: ‘I Micenei a Iasos’ in de Lachenal, L. (ed.), Studi su Iasos di Caria: Venticinque anni di scavi della Missione Archeologica Italiana (Bollettino d'Arte Supplement 31–32). Rome: 29–34Google Scholar
Blegen, C.W., Boulter, C., Caskey, J.L., Rawson, M. 1958: Troy IV. Settlements VIIa, VIIb and VIII. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Blegen, C.W., Caskey, J.L., Rawson, M. 1953: Troy III. The Sixth Settlement. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Boysal, Y. 1969: Katalog der Vasen im Museum von Bodrum I: Mykenisch-Protogeometrisch. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Bryce, T.R. 1974: ‘The Lukka problem and a possible solution’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 33: 395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, T.R. 1989: ‘The nature of Mycenaean involvement in western Anatolia’ Historia 38: 1–21Google Scholar
Bryce, T.R. 1998: The Kingdom of the Hittites. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Büyükkolancı, M. 2007: ‘Apaša, das alte Ephesos und Ayasoluk’ in Cobet, J., von Graeve, V., Niemeier, W.-D., Zimmermann, K. (eds), Frühes Ionien eine Bestandsaufnahme, Panionion-Symposion Güzelçamlı 26 September–1 Oktober 1999. Mainz: 21–26Google Scholar
Büyükkolancı, , 2008: ‘Selçuk Ayasuluk Tepesi (Eski Efes) “Appasas” mı?’ in Erkanal-Öktü, A., Günel, S., Deniz, U. (eds), Batı Anadolu ve Doğu Akdeniz Geç Tunç Çağı Kültürleri Üzerine Yeni Araştırmalar. Ankara: 41–55Google Scholar
Coulson, W.D.E. 1986: The Dark Age Pottery of Messenia. GothenburgGoogle Scholar
Deger-Jalkotzy, S. 2003: ‘Stratified pottery deposits from the Late Helladic III C settlement at Aigeira/Achaiat’ in Deger-Jalkotzy, S., Zavadil, M. (eds), LH III Chronology and Synchronisms. Vienna: 53–75Google Scholar
Demakoulou, K. 2003: ‘The pottery from the destruction in Midea: Late Helladic III B 2 Late or Transitional Late Helladic III B 2/Late Helladic III C Early?’ in Deger-Jalkotzy, S., Zavadil, M. (eds), LH III Chronology and Synchronisms. Vienna: 77–92Google Scholar
Dietz, S. 1982: Asine II. Results of the Excavations East of the Acropolis 1970–74. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Erkanal, H. 2008: ‘Geç Tunç Çağı'nda Liman Tepe’ in Erkanal-Öktü, A., Günel, S., Deniz, U. (eds), Batı Anadolu ve Doğu Akdeniz Geç Tunç Çağı Kültürleri Üzerine Yeni Araştırmalar. Ankara: 91–100Google Scholar
Erkanal, H., Karaturgut, E. 2004: ‘2002 Yılı Çeşme-Bağlararası Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 25: 153–64Google Scholar
Erkanal-Öktü, A. 2008: ‘The Late Bronze Age cemeteries of Panaztepe’ in Erkanal-Öktü, A., Günel, S., Deniz, U. (eds), Batı Anadolu ve Doğu Akdeniz Geç Tunç Çağı Kültürleri Üzerine Yeni Araştırmalar. Ankara: 69–90Google Scholar
Forsdyke, E.J. 1925: Catalogue of the Greek and Etruscan Vases in the British Museum. LondonGoogle Scholar
French, E. 1965: ‘Late Helladic III A2 pottery from Mycenae’ The Annual of the British School at Athens 60: 159–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frizell, B.S. 1986: Asine II. Results of the Excavations East of the Acropolis 1970–74. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Furumark, A. 1941: The Mycenaean Pottery. Analysis and Classification. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Garstang, J. 1943: ‘Hittite military roads in Asia Minor. A study in imperial strategy with a map’ American Journal of Archaeology 47: 35–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, J., Gurney, O.R. 1959: The Geography of the Hittite Empire. LondonGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A. 2003: Miletus. Bir Tarih. IstanbulGoogle Scholar
Greaves, A. 2007: ‘Trans-Anatolia: examining Turkey as a bridge between East and West’ Anatolian Studies 57: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, P., Knell, H., Slenezka, E., Voigtländer, W. 1980: ‘Grabungen in den Quadranten IV 2. V. VI 2’ in Jantzen, U. (ed.), Tiryns IX. Mainz: 89–179Google Scholar
Günel, S. 1999a: PANAZTEPE II. M.Ö. 2. Bine Tarihlendirilen Panaztepe Seramiğinin Batı Anadolu ve Ege Arkeolojisindeki Yeri ve Önemi / Die Keramik von Panaztepe und ihre Bedeutung für Westkleinasien und die Ägäis im 2. Jahrtausend. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Günel, S. 1999b: ‘Vorbericht über die mittel- und spätbronzezeitliche Keramik vom Liman Tepe’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 49: 41–82Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2006a: ‘New contributions to western Anatolian cultural history: Aydın region survey project’ Praehistorische Zeitschrift 81/2: 153–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günel, S. 2006b: ‘Çine-Tepecik Höyüğü 2004 Yılı Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 27/1: 19–28Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2007: ‘Çine-Tepecik Höyüğü 2005 Yılı Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 28/1: 231–46Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2008a: ‘Çine-Tepecik Kazıları ve Bölge Arkeolojisine Katkıları’ in Erkanal-Öktü, A., Günel, S., Deniz, U. (eds), Batı Anadolu ve Doğu Akdeniz Geç Tunç Çağı Kültürleri Üzerine Yeni Araştırmalar. Ankara: 129–39Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2008b: ‘Çine-Tepecik Höyük 2006 Yılı Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 29/1: 73–90Google Scholar
Günel, S. 2009: ‘Çine-Tepecik 2007 Yılı Kazıları’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 30/1: 227–40Google Scholar
Güterbock, H.G. 1983: ‘The Hittites and the Aegean world: the Ahhiyawa problem reconsidered’ American Journal of Archaeology 87: 133–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.D. 1998: ‘Tarkasnawa King of Mira. “Tarkondemos”, Boğazköy sealings and Karabel’ Anatolian Studies 48: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, D. 2007: ‘Der aiolische Siedlungsraum (Aiolis) am Übergang von der Bronze-zur Eisenzeit’ in Cobet, J., von Graeve, V., Niemeier, W.-D., Zimmermann, K. (eds), Frühes Ionien eine Bestand saufnahme, Panionion-Symposion Güzelçamlı 26 September–1 Oktober 1999. Mainz: 97–122Google Scholar
Holmberg, E.J. 1983: A Mycenaean Chamber Tomb near Berbati in Argolis (Humaniora 21). GothenburgGoogle Scholar
Hommel, P. 1959/1960: ‘Der Abschnitt Östlich des Athena-Tempels’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 9/10: 31–62Google Scholar
Hood, S. 1982: Excavations in Chios 1938–1955: Prehistoric Emporio and Ayio Gala. II (British School at Athens Supplement 16). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jacob-Felsch, M. 1987a: ‘Die Entwicklung der Keramik der Phase SH III C Fortgeschritten und spät anhand der Schichtenfolge von Kalapodi und ihre Relation zu vergleichbaren Fundkomplexen’ in Thomas, E. (ed.), Forschungen zur Ägäischen Vorgeschichte, Das Ende der mykenischen Welt, Athen des internationalen Kolloquiums Köln 1984. Cologne: 37–52Google Scholar
Jacob-Felsch, M. 1987b: ‘Kalapodi. Bericht zur Spätmykenischen und Submykenischen Keramik’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1: 26–35Google Scholar
Kilian, K. 1982: ‘Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1980. Bericht zu den Grabungen’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 3: 393–430Google Scholar
Knell, H., Voigtländer, W. 1980: ‘Grabungen in den Quadranten IV 2. V. VI 2, Die Ergebnisse in den Quadranten V2 und VI2’ in Jantzen, U. (ed.), Tiryns IX. Mainz: 118–51Google Scholar
Konstantinopoulos, G. 1973: ‘New finds from Rhodes and Astypalaia’ Athens Annals of Archaeology 6: 121–24Google Scholar
Korfmann, M. 1986: ‘Vorbericht über die Ergebnisse der Grabungen von 1984. Grabungen am Beşik-Yassıtepe, Beşik-Sivritepe und Beşik-Gräberfeld’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 3: 303–29Google Scholar
Korfmann, M. 1988: ‘Vorbericht über die Ergebnisse der Grabungen von 1985 und 1986. Grabungen am Beşik-Yassıtepe und im Beşik-Gräberfeld’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 3: 391–404Google Scholar
Lewartowski, K. 1987: ‘Unpublished Mycenaean objects from Kalamaki (Attica) in the National Museum at Athens’ Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung 102: 115–30Google Scholar
Macqueen, J.G. 1968: ‘Geography and history in western Asia Minor in the second millennium BC’ Anatolian Studies 18: 169–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallwitz, A. 1959/1960: ‘Zur mykenischen Befestigung von Milet’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 9/10: 67–85Google Scholar
Mee, C. 1998: ‘Anatolia and the Aegean in the Late Bronze Age’ Aegaeum 18: 137–48Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., Murray, A. 1995: Beycesultan III.2: Late Bronze Age and Phrygian Pottery and Middle and Late Bronze Age Small Objects. LondonGoogle Scholar
Meriç, R. 2003: ‘Excavations at Bademgediği Tepe (Puranda) 1999–2002: a preliminary report’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 53: 79–98Google Scholar
Meriç, R. 2007: ‘Ein Vorbericht über eine spätbronzezeitliche befestigte Höhensiedlung bei Metropolis in Ionien: die Arzawa-Stadt Puranda?’ in Cobet, J., von Graeve, V., Niemeier, W.-D., Zimmermann, K. (eds), Frühes Ionien eine Bestandsaufnahme, Panionion-Symposion Güzelçamlı 26 September–1 Oktober 1999. Mainz: 27–36Google Scholar
Meriç, R., Mountjoy, P.A. 2001: ‘Three Mycenaean vases from Ionia’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 51: 137–41Google Scholar
Meriç, R., Mountjoy, PA. 2002: ‘Mycenaean pottery from Bademgediği Tepe (Puranda) in Ionia: a preliminary report’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 52: 79–98Google Scholar
Morricone, L. 1975: ‘Coo-Scavi e Scoperte Nel “Serraglio” e in Localitá Minori (1935–1943)’ Annuario della Scuola archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni italiane in Oriente 50–51: 139–396Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1976: ‘Late Helladic III B1 pottery dating the construction of the South House at Mycenae’ The Annual of the British School at Athens 71: 77–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1983: Orchomenos V. Mycenaean Pottery from Orchomenos, Eutresis and other Boeotian Sites. MunichGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1995: ‘Thorikos mine no.3: the Mycenaean pottery’ The Annual of the British School at Athens 90: 195–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1996: ‘Asine chamber tomb I. 1: the pottery’ in Hägg, R., Nordquist, G.C., Wells, B. (eds), Asine III. Supplementary Studies on the Swedish Excavations 1922–1930. Stockholm: 47–67Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1998: ‘The east Aegean-west Anatolian interface in the Late Bronze Age: Mycenaeans and the Kingdom of Ahhiyawa’ Anatolian Studies 48: 33–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1999a: Regional Mycenean Decorated Pottery. RahdenGoogle Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1999b: ‘Troia VII reconsidered’ Studia Troica 9: 295–346Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P.A. 1999c: ‘Late Minoan III C / Late Helladic III C: chronology and terminology’ in Betancourt, P.P., Karageorghis, V., Laffineur, R., Niemeier, W.-D. (eds), MELETEMATA: Studies in Aegean Archaeology Presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as He Enters His 65th Year (Aegaeum 20). Liège: 511–16Google Scholar
Niemeier, B., Niemeier, W-D. 1997: ‘Milet 1994–1995. Projekt Minoisch-Mykenisches bis Protogeometrisches Milet: Zielsetzung und Grabungen auf dem Stadionhügel und am Athenatempel’ Archäologischer Anzeiger. 189–248Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 1998: ‘The Mycenaeans in western Anatolia and the problem of the origins of the Sea Peoples’ in Gitin, S., Mazar, A., Stern, E. (eds), Mediterranean Peoples in Transition. Jerusalem: 17–65Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 2007a: ‘Milet von den Anfängen menschlicher Besiedlung bis zur Ionischen Wanderung’ in Cobet, J., von Graeve, V., Niemeier, W.-D., Zimmermann, K. (eds), Frühes Ionien eine Bestand saufnahme, Panionion-Symposion Güzelçamlı 26 September–1 Oktober 1999. Mainz: 3–20Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. 2007b: ‘Westkleinasien und Ägäis von den Anfängen bis zur Ionischen Wanderung: Topographie, Geschichte und Beziehungen nach dem archäologischen Befund und den Hethitischen Quellen’ in Cobet, J., von Graeve, V., Niemeier, W.-D., Zimmermann, K. (eds), Frühes Ionien eine Bestandsaufnahme, Panionion-Symposion Güzelçamlı 26 September–1 Oktober 1999. Mainz: 37–96Google Scholar
Özkan, T., Erkanal, H. 1999: Tahtalı Barajı Kurtarma kazısı Projesi. Tahtalı Dam Area Salvage Project. IzmirGoogle Scholar
Papadimitriou, A. 1988: ‘Bericht zur Früheisenzeitlichen Keramik aus der Unterburg von Tiryns. Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1982/83’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 2: 227–43Google Scholar
Pavúk, P. 2007: ‘What can Troia tell us about the Middle Helladic period in the southern Aegean?’ in Elten, F., Gauss, W., Smetana, R. (eds), Middle Helladic Pottery and Synchronisms. Vienna: 295–308Google Scholar
Peschlow-Bindokat, A. 2001: ‘Eine Hethitische Grossprinzeninschrift aus dem Latmos. Vorläufiger Bericht’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 3: 363–78Google Scholar
Podzuweit, C. 1979: ‘Bericht zur Spätmykenischen Keramik. Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1976’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 4: 471–98Google Scholar
Podzuweit, C. 1983: ‘Bericht zur Spätmykenischen Keramik. Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1981’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 3: 359–402Google Scholar
Podzuweit, C. 1988: ‘Keramik der Phase SH III C-spät aus der Unterburg von Tiryns. Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1982/1983’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 2: 213–25Google Scholar
Popham, M., Schofield, E., Sherratt, S. 2006: ‘The pottery’ in Evely, D. (ed.), Lefkandi IV. The Bronze Age. The Late Helladic III C Settlement at Xeropolis (British School at Athens Supplement 39). London: 137–231Google Scholar
Rutter, J.B. 2003: ‘The nature and potential significance of Minoan features and the earliest Late Helladic III C ceramic assemblages of the central and southern Greek mainland’ in Deger-Jalkotzy, S., Zavadil, M. (eds), LH III Chronology and Synchronisms. Vienna: 192–216Google Scholar
Rystedt, E., Wells, B. 2006: Pictorial Pursuits. Figurative Painting on Mycenaean and Geometric Pottery. StockholmGoogle Scholar
Schachermeyr, F. 1986: Mykene und das Hethiterreich (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 472. Bd). ViennaGoogle Scholar
Schiering, W. 1959/1960: ‘Südabschnitt’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 9/10: 4–30Google Scholar
Schönfeld, G. 1988: ‘Bericht zur bemalten mykenischen Keramik. Ausgrabungen in Tiryns 1982/83. Die Phasen SH III A-spät bis SH III B-mitte’ Archäologischer Anzeiger. 153–211Google Scholar
Sherratt, S. 2000: Catalogue of Cycladic Antiquities in the Ashmolean Museum. Vols I–II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Souyoudzoglou-Haywood, C. 1999: The Ionian Islands in the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age 3000–800 BC. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Stockhammer, P. 2006: ‘Bericht zur spätmykenischen Keramik aus Stadt-Nordost’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1: 139–62Google Scholar
Şahoğlu, V. 2007: ‘Çeşme-Bağlararası: a new excavation in western Anatolia’ in Felten, F., Gauss, W., Smetana, R. (eds), Middle Helladic Pottery and Synchronisms. Proceedings of the International Workshop held at Salzburg, October 31st–November 2nd 2004. Vienna: 309–22Google Scholar
Thomatos, M. 2006: The Final Revival of the Aegean Bronze Age. A Case Study of the Argolid, Corinthia, Attica, Euboea, the Cyclades and the Dodecanese during LH IIIC Middle (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1498). OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, K.A. 1973: ‘A group of Late Helladic III B2 pottery from within the citadel at Mycenae “the Causeway Deposit”’ The Annual of the British School at Athens 68: 297–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, K.A. 1993: ‘Mycenaean trade and influence in northern Greece’ in Zerner, C., Zerner, P., Winder, J. (eds), Wace and Blegen. Pottery as Evidence for Trade in the Aegean Bronze Age 1939–1989. Amsterdam: 117–41Google Scholar
Weickert, C. 1957: ‘Die Ausgrabungen beim Athena-Tempel in Milet 1955’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 7: 102–32Google Scholar