Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:03:14.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative analyses of correlates of Red data book status: a case study using European hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

Matthew S. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
Francis Gilbert
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences (UP), University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Graham Rotheray
Affiliation:
Department of Natural History, National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK
Stevan Croasdale
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
Martin Jones
Affiliation:
Behavioural and Environmental Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
Get access

Abstract

We present a comparative analysis of correlates of Red data book status that controls for phylogeny. As a model system we use 244 species of hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the British fauna, with their Red data book statuses in Britain and three regions of Germany. The analysis is confined to four adult characters, with Red data book status as the dependent variable. Associated with an increase in risk of extinction were a decrease in flight period and an increase in wing length (in two regions). Variables representing the number of habitats occupied and whether species were single- or multi-brooded were not associated with an increase in risk of extinction. At this stage we restrict our analysis to the identification of patterns rather than speculation as to causal mechanisms, but the patterns themselves are of value to conservation biologists, provided the methods used to identify them control for the possible confounding effects of phylogeny.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)