Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:28:05.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cottonseed for protein and energy supplementation of high-roughage diets for beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Brosh ,
Z. Holzer  and
D. Levy
A. Brosh
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya‘ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa Post, Israel
Z. Holzer
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya‘ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa Post, Israel
D. Levy
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya‘ar Regional Experiment Station, Haifa Post, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The use of cottonseed (CS) as an energy and protein supplement to high wheat-straw diets was studied in a digestion and nitrogen balance trial, and as a component in fattening diets in a feeding trial. The proportions of CS studied were 0, 60, 120, 180 and 240 g/kg diet dry matter (DM). DM intake per kg M0·75 was 33, 31, 40, 31 and 29 g, respectively. The digestibility coefficient of organic matter was 415, 463, 417, 441, 350 g/kg DM and of neutral-detergent fibre was 350, 436, 411, 309, 334 g/kg DM. Nitrogen balance was –2·52, 1·1, 5·38, 5·63, 7·60 g/day respectively, for the same order of treatments. The effect of high proportions of CS in the diet in restricting DM intake and reducing its digestibility was evident. The results of the feeding trial were in agreement with those of the digestion trial and indicate the proportion of 120 g CS per kg DM as optimal and maximal.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 513 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Baile, C. C. 1979. Regulation of energy balance and control of food intake. In: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant (ed. Church, D.C.), pp. 291–320. O & B Books, Oregon.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. C, Garner, G. B., Gehrke, C. W., Muhrer, M. E. and Pfander, W. H. 1954. The effect of added fat on the digestion of cellulose and protein by ovine rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 13: 758–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapperton, J. L. and Steele, W. 1983. Fat supplementation in animal production — ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 42: 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppock, C. E., West, J. W., Moya, J. R., Nave, D. H., Labore, J. M., Thompson, K. G., Rowe, L. D. and Gates, C. E. 1985. Effects of amount of whole cottonseed on intake, digestibility and physiological responses of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2248–2258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, K. A. and Russell, R. W. 1985. Effects of feeding whole cottonseed to lactating dairy cows on glucose and palmitate metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2009–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czerkawski, J. W. and Clapperton, J. L. 1984. Fats as energy yielding compounds in the ruminants diet. In Fats in Animal Nutrition (ed. Wisman, J.), pp. 123–149. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Lewis, D. 1974. The interactionbetween dietary lipids and fibre in the sheep. 2. Digestibility studies. Animal Production 19: 67–76.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. G. 1986. NDF cell wall. Predicting dry matter intake of beef cattle. Proceedings of the 1986 Cornell Nutrition Conference, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
Goering, K. H. and Van soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agriculture Handbook, US Department of Agriculture, No. 379.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G. E., Cummins, K. A., Silverio, M. and Jilek, J. J. 1985. Physiological effects of whole cottonseeds in the diet of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2608–2614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moor, J. A., Swingle, R. S. and Hale, W. H. 1986. Effects of whole cottonseed, cottonseed oil or animal fat on digestibility of wheat straw diets by steers. Journal of Animal Science 63: 1267–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1976. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 4, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 5th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Polidori, F., Dell'orto, V., Corino, C., Giusi, A., Bertolino, G. and Savorini, G. 1986. Use of whole cottonseed for feeding dairy cows. Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animale 12: 25–34.Google Scholar