Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:28:47.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary structure on animal performance and lesions in the ruminal wall and feet of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. de Campeneere ,
A. van Herck ,
L. O. Fiems ,
J. L. de Boever ,
K. Chiers ,
R. Ducatelle  and
D. L. de Brabander
S. de Campeneere*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
A. van Herck
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
L. O. Fiems
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
J. L. de Boever
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
K. Chiers
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
R. Ducatelle
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
D. L. de Brabander
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Agricultural Research Centre, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
*
†E-mail: s.decampeneere@clo.fgov.be
Get access

Abstract

The influence of the physical structure level in the diet on animal performance was investigated in 52 Belgian Blue doublemuscled bulls starting from a live weight of 348 kg until slaughter at about 645 kg. Four diets with different concentrate/maize silage ratios were offered ad libitum. The structural value (SV), developed in Belgium as a measure of physical structure in the diet for dairy cows, amounted to respectively 0.63 (HSV; high SV), 0.54 (MSV; moderate SV), 0.43 (LSV; low SV) and 0.34 (VLSV; very low SV) per kg dry matter.

Growth rate, food intake and food conversion were all linearly affected by the decreasing SV of the diet. Among carcass parameters only the SEUROP conformation score showed a significant effect of the SV, with the MSV group having the highest score and VLSV the lowest. No important influence of the SV on the histological damage of the ruminal papillae or on the foot lesions was found.

Based on the lower growth rate and food intake of the LSV group versus the HSV group, a SV of the diet between 0.54 and 0.43 is considered as an absolute minimum for Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls.

Keywords

beef bullsdouble musclingfeetroughagerumenitis
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1991. Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. Official publications of the European Communities no. 1208/81, 2930/81 and 1026/91, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Boever de, J. L., Cottyn, B. G., Brabander de, D. L., Vanacker, J. M. and Boucqué, Ch. V. 1999. Equations to predict digestibility and energy value of grass silages, maize silages, grass hays, compound feeds and raw materials for cattle. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 69: 835–850.Google Scholar
Boucqué, Ch. V., Fiems, L. O., Cottyn, B. G. and Buysse, F. X. 1983. Sodium hydroxide-treated straw pellets in complete diets for finishing beef bulls. In Proceedings of the international symposium on animals as waste convertors, Wageningen (ed. Ketelaars, E. H. and Boer, S.), pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
Brabander de, D. L., Boever de, J. L., Vanacker, J. M., Boucqué, Ch. V. and Botterman, S. M. 1999. Evaluation of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Wiseman, J.), thirty-third feed manufacturers conference, pp. 111–145. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Brabander de, D. L., Boever de, J. L., Vanacker, J. M. and Geerts, N. 2002. Evaluation and effects of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In Recent developments and perspectives in bovine medicine (ed. Kaske, M., Scholz, H. and Holtershinken, M.), XXII world buiatrics congress, Hannover, pp. 182–197.Google Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Fiems, L. O., Boever de, J. L., Vanacker, J. M. and Brabander de., D. L. 2002a. Decreasing the roughage: concentrate ratio of a diet to determine the critical roughage part for beef cattle. Archives for Animal Nutrition 56: 1–12.Google Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Fiems, L. O., Bosschere de, H., Boever de, J. L. and Ducatelle, R. 2002b. The effect of physical structure in maize silage-based diets for beef bulls. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 86: 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Fiems, L. O., Bosschere de, H., Vanacker, J. M. and Ducatelle, R. 2002c. Minimal dietary physical structure level for Belgian Blue double-muscled finishing bulls. Animal Research 51: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Fiems, L. O. and Boucqué, Ch. V. 2001. Energy and protein standards for Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Fiems, L. O. and Brabander de., D. L. 2004a. Determination of a standard for physical structure requirement for Belgian Blue bulls. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 13: (suppl. 1) 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campeneere de, S., Herck van, A., Fiems, L. O., Brabander de, D. L., Boever de, J. L., Vanacker, J. M. and Aerts, J. M. 2004b. Structuurbehoefte van Belgisch Wit-Blauwe stieren. Department Animal Nutrition and Husbandry, Melle.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau. 1996. Verkorte tabel: voedernormen landbouwhuisdieren en voederwaarde veevoeders, nr. 20.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. J., Klopfenstein, T. J., Stock, R. A., Milton, C. T., Herold, D. W. and Parrot, J. C. 1999. Effects of imposed feed intake variation on acidosis and performance of finishing steers. Journal of Animal Science 77: 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirksen, G. 1970. Acidosis. In Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 612–625. Oriel Press Limited, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Es van, A. J. H.. 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The system in use from May 1977 onwards in The Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 5: 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatt, W. P., Moe, P. W., Munson, A. W. and Cooper, T. 1969. Factors associated with variation in milk fat depression resulting from high grain diets fed to dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 613–619.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G. 1994. Using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for improving the performance of cattle. Proceedings of the southwest nutrition and management conference,Phoenix, Arizona, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
Fulton, W. R., Klopfenstein, T. J. and Britton, R. A. 1979. Adaptation to high concentrate diets by beef cattle. II. Effect of ruminal pH alteration on rumen fermentation and voluntary intake. Journal of Animal Science 49: 785–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, N. 1995. Unterscheidliche Häckselgutstruktur von Halmfütter: Einfluss auf Futteraufnahme, Leistung und Kauverhalten von Rindern, Silagequalität und Häcksellleistungsbedarf sowie bildanalytische Vermessung der Futterstruktur. Dissertation, University of Giessen.Google Scholar
Hinders, R. F. and Owen, F. G. 1965. Relation of ruminal parakeratosis development to volatile fatty acid absorption. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 1069–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, M. 1983. Tierfütterung. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Istasse, L., MacLeod, N. A., Goodall, E. D. and Ørskov, E. R. 1987. Effects on plasma insulin of intermittent infusions of propionic acid, glucose or casein into the alimentary tract of non-lactating cows maintained on a liquid diet. British Journal of Nutrition 58: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. C., Hunt, R. D. and King, N. W. 1997. The digestive system. In Veterinary pathology (ed. Jones, T. C., Hunt, R. D. and King, N. W.), pp. 1057–1060. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Journet, M. 1988. Optimisation des rations. In Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins (ed. Jarrige, R.), pp. 121–134. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
Linford, R. L. 2002. Laminitis. In Large animal internal medicine (ed. Smith, B. P.), pp. 1116–1124. Mosby, St Louis.Google Scholar
McGavin, M. D., Carlton, W. W. and Zachary, J. F. 2001. Thomson's special veterinary pathology. Mosby, St Louis.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fibre requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 1463–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagaraja, T. G. and Chengappa, M. M. 1998. Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76: 287–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied linear statistical models, fourth edition. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E. 1997. Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 1005–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, F. N., Secrist, D. S., Hill, W. J. and Gill, D. R. 1998. Acidosis in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76: 275–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J., Moore, C. A. and Moss, B. W. 2000. Effects of the ratio of silage to concentrates in the diet on the performance and carcass composition of continental bulls. Animal Science 70: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1974. Intensive beef production, second edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Price, M. A., Jones, S. D. M., Mathison, G. W. and Berg, R. T. 1980. The effects of increasing dietary roughage level and slaughter weight on the feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of bulls and steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60: 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radostits, O. M., Blood, D. C. and Gay, C. C. 1997. Diseases of the rumen, reticulum and omasum. In Veterinary medicine (ed. Radostits, O. M., Blood, D. C., Gay, C. C.), pp. 269–270. W. B. Saunders, London.Google Scholar
Schwarz, F. J., Augustini, C. and Kirchgessner, M. 2000. Effect of increasing concentrate ratios in silage-based diets on gain and carcass and meat quality of Simmental bulls. In Book of abstracts of the 51st annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, The Hague, Netherlands (ed. van Arendonk, J. A. M.), p. 270.Google Scholar
Sniffen, C. J., O'Conner, J. D., Van Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G. and Russell, J. B. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3562–3577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, G. S. G. 1985. Hormonal systems regulating growth: a review. Livestock Production Science 12: 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences. 2003. SPSS 12. 0 for Windows and Smartviewer. SPSS, Chicago.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 2000. The effects of the ratio of grass silage to concentrates in the diet and restricted dry matter intake on the performance and carcass composition of beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 62: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Robson, A. E. 1995. Effects of forage to concentrate ratio in the diet and protein intake on the performance and carcass composition of heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125: 125–135.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S., Straelen van, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G. and Blok, M. C. 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verbeke, R. and Voorde van de, G.. 1978. Détermination de la composition de demi-carcasses de bovins par la dissection d'une seule côte. Revue de l'Agriculture 31: 875–880.Google Scholar
Weiss, W. P. 1993. Fibre requirements of dairy cattle: emphasis NDF. Proceedings of the 54th Minnesota nutrition conference and national renderers technical symposium,Bloomington, Minnesota, pp 63–76.Google Scholar