Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:31:04.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of duration of wilting on the conservation of silage and on gains in body components by steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. Charmley  and
C. Thomas
E. Charmley
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Four silages were prepared from a sward of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Melle). Two were ensiled directly either without (UWN) or with formic acid at 31 1/t fresh material (UWA). The remaining herbage was left undisturbed in the swath for 43 h (WL) or was spread and harvested after 19 h (WS). The dry matter (DM) concentrations at harvest for the unwilted herbage were 229 (UWN) and 238 g DM per kg (UWA) and wilting increased DM concentration to a similar extent for both treatments (WS, 339 v. WL, 346 g DM per kg).

Forty British Friesian steers initially 3·5 months of age and 105 kg live weight were used for the trial. Eight steers were allocated to an initial slaughter group and the remainder were offered the four silages at a restricted level to give 940 kJ digestible energy per kg M0·75. These animals were slaughtered after 112 days to estimate the incremental increases in the components of the body.

Loss of DM in the field by respiration increased from 22·2 to 40·6 g/kg DM cut with increased length of wilting. In silo losses were greater with unwilted (UWN, 222, UWA 183 g/kg DM ensiled) than with wilted silage (WS, 133 WL, 122 g/kg DM ensiled). All silages were well preserved. Wilting was more effective than formic acid in reducing total fermentation acids but a lower proportion of these acids was in the form of lactic acid.

Live-weight gain was lower for the steers given the control (UWN) silage (398 g/day) than for those given silages UWA (463 g/day), WS (476 g/day) and WL (470 g/day). However, a lower proportion of the gain by steers given UWN was in the form of gut contents so that gains in fat, protein and energy were not significantly affected by treatment. In conclusion, when steers were given similar amounts of digestible energy and unwilted silage was well preserved, neither the use of formic acid nor wilting influenced gains in protein and energy. Further, the duration of wilting, in the absence of any differences in DM content, had no effect on animal performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 91 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Charmley, E. and Thomas, C. 1987. Wilting of herbage prior to ensiling: effects on conservation losses, silage fermentation and growth of beef cattle. Animal Production 45: 191–203.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. and Edwards, R. A. 1976. Feeding value of silage: silages made from freshly cut grass, wilted grass and formic acid treated wilted grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27: 536–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, T. J. and Jackson, N. 1971. A study of the utilization of silage of different dry-matter content by young beef cattle with or without supplementar y barley. Journal of the British Grassland Society 26: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, P. M. and Parklr, J. W. G. 1985. Effect of silage additives and wilting on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake, and on liveweight change of young cattle. Grass and Forage Science 40: 429–436.Google Scholar
Honig, H. 1980. Mechanical and respiration losses during pre-wilting of grass. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occasional Symposium, British Grassland Society, No. 11, pp. 201–204.Google Scholar
Honig, H., Rohr, K. and Daenicke, R. 1984. In Efficiency of Silage Systems: A Comparison Between Unwilted and Wilted Silages, (ed. Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J.) Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Jackson, N. and Forbes, T. J. 1970. The voluntary intake by cattle of four silages differing in dry matter content. Animal Production 12: 591–599.Google Scholar
Jones, L. 1979. The effect of stage of growth on the rate of drying of cut grass at 20°C. Grass and Forage Science 34: 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilisation by growing cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to silage. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. 1979. The effects of wilting on fermentation n i the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass and Forage Science 34: 1–10.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of unwilted and wilted grass silages offered to beef cattle without and with monensin sodium. Grass and Forage Science 39: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bockstaei, E. E. J., Blhaeghe, T. J. and De baets, A. E. 1980. Studies on the field losses of wilting grass. In Forage Conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), Occasional Symposium, British Grassland Society, No. 11, pp. 205–209.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. C. and Chestnuit, D. M. B. 1988. Effect of unwilted and wilted grass silage on the intake and performance by pregnant ewes at varying levels of concentrate feeding. Animal Production 46: 63–70.Google Scholar
Zimmer, E. and Honig, H. 1984. Composition of material and conservation losses. In Efficiency of Silage Systems: A Comparison Between Unwilled and Wilted Silages. (ed. Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J.) Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69, pp. 47–63.Google Scholar
Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J. 1984. Efficiency of Silage Systems: A Comparison Between Unwilled and Wilted Silages. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69.Google Scholar