Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:03:37.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of season and level of concentrate on the voluntary intake and digestibility of herbage by outdoor sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. G. Rivera Ferre ,
S. A. Edwards ,
R. W. Mayes ,
I. Riddoch  and
F. D. DeB. Hovell
M. G. Rivera Ferre
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK Scottish Agricultural College, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, UK
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK Scottish Agricultural College, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, UK
R. W. Mayes
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
I. Riddoch
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Craibstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA, UK
F. D. DeB. Hovell
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA, UK
Get access

Abstract

The intake and the digestibility of herbage, and the effect of level of supplementary concentrate food, were measured in late spring and late summer in two studies, each with eight multiparous, pregnant sows. In the spring study sows were nose rung to prevent rooting but only four nose-rung sows were available for the summer study; the remaining four were unrung. In both cases, sows had access to a plentiful (>2·5 t organic matter (OM) per ha) ryegrass/clover sward in a paddock of 1922 m2. After a week of adaptation to the herbage in the experimental paddock, sows were offered 1·5 or 3·0 kg/day concentrate for consecutive 2-week periods in a change-over experimental design with four sows on each treatment in each period. Samples of herbage were also taken to measure the sward density, chemical composition and n-alkane content. Herbage intake and digestibility estimates were calculated using the n-alkanes technique, with the marker dosed on small food pellets. In the spring study, the herbage intake ranged from 0·9 to 1·8 kg OM per day in the first period (herbage neutral-detergent fibre(NDF) content 439 (s.e.41·6) g/kg OM) and 0·2 to 1·4 kg in the second (475 (s.e.29·3) g NDF per kg OM). The intake was affected by the level of concentrate only in the second period. The results obtained during the summer study with the rung and unrung sows showed an intake between 0·9 and 2·4 kg OM per day in the first period (524 (s.e. 16·0) g NDF per kg OM) and between 1·3 and 4·8 kg in the second (526 (s.e. 21·8) g NDF per kg OM). A high intake estimation for certain unrung individuals appeared to reflect their frenzied feeding behaviour and possible loss of some marker pellets. There were no differences between level of concentrate treatments in either period. Digestibility of the diet was affected by the intake of herbage and the level of fibre consumed (P < 0·01). These herbage intakes equated to proportionately 0·50 (s.e. 0·05) and 0·66 (s.e. 0·1) (or 0·49 (s.e. 0·07) excluding problem sows) of the maintenance energy requirement in each season. Faeces of unrung sows indicated a high ingestion of soil or stones by some individuals: one of the sows produced a bulked faeces sample containing 450 g/kg fresh weight of stones, whilst another sow had a faecal ash content of 937 g/kg DM. The results indicate that the intake of nutrients from herbage by grazing sows is highly variable between seasons and individuals.

Keywords

digestibilityfood intakeseasonal variationsows
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 501 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. CAB, Farnham Royal, Slough.Google Scholar
Boaz, T. G. 1962. The significance of level of protein in the nutrition of the pregnant sow. Veterinary Record 74: 1482–1489.Google Scholar
Brouns, F., Edwards, S. A. and English, P. R. 1995. Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54: 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. M. E., Edwards, S. A., Smith, W. J., Thompson, E. and Duncan, J. 1996. Welfare and production implications of teeth clipping and iron injection of piglets in outdoor systems in Scotland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 27: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, L. J., Bruce, J. M. and Edwards, S. A. 1994. Modelling the energy system of outdoor sows. Pig News and Information 15: 125N–128N.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. and Poornan, P. K. 1993. Outdoor pigs: their nutrient requirements, appetite and environmental responses. In Recent advances in animal nutrition-1993 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D.J. A.), pp. 175–196. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A. and Chadd, S. A. 1989. Voluntary food intake of growing pigs. In The voluntary food intake of pigs (ed. Forbes, J. M., Varley, M. A. and Lawrence, T.L. J.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no 13, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
Crowther, C. 1934. Pig breeding annual no. 14. 61–70.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. R. 1930. The value of grazing for fattening pigs. Scottish Journal of Agriculture XIII: 3.Google Scholar
Dove, H. and Mayes, R. W. 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42: 913–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. A. 1994. Outdoor pig production: the European perspective. Pig News and Information 15: 111N-112N.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. and Zanella, A. 1996 [Pig production in outdoor systems in Europe: production, welfare and environmental considerations.] A Hora Veterinara 92: 86–93.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. C. B. 1937. The feeding of farm livestock. Crosby Lockwood and Son, London.Google Scholar
Gannon, M. A. 1996. The energy balance of pigs outdoors. Ph.D. thesis. University of Nottingham. Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. 1985. The advantages and limitations of fibrous feedingstuffs. Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. and Fowler, V. R. 1984. Pig feeding in the future: back to nature? Span 27: 3.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. and Fowler, V. R. 1987. The correction of digestible energy for fermentative losses: a simple concept for the evaluation of unusual feed sources for pigs. Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Lisboa, Portugal 5·10.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. 1993. Role of dietary fibre in pig diets. In Recent developments in pig nutrition — 1 (ed. D. J. A. Cole, , Haresign, W. and Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 137–162. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Nappan Experimental Farm. 1964. Sows fed with grass. Department of Agriculture, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
Salt, C. A., Mayes, R. W. and Elston, D. A. 1992. Effects of season, grazing intensity and diet composition on the radiocaesium intake by sheep on re-seeded hill pasture. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 378–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, T. G. 1976. A preliminary evaluation of the value of grass and grass pulp to non lactating sows. M.Sc. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, H., Sinclair, A. G., Hovell, F. D., Mayes, R. W. and Edwards, S. A. 1999. Validation of the n-alkane technique for measuring herbage intake in sows. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1999, p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar