Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:27:13.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dam and sire group on the propensity for twin calving in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. A. Morris  and
A. M. Day
C. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
A. M. Day
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

The incidence of twin calvings and double ovulations was studied in two Milking Shorthorn herds and one Friesian herd, each with above-average annual twin calving rates (average 0·031, compared with a national rate of 0·01). The proportions of double ovulations were calculated from records comprising 1237 cow × years (cows over 2·0 years of age); means were 0·08, 0·27 and 0·50, for three groups which had previously produced 0, 1 or >1 sets of twins, respectively. All cows (whether still present or no longer in the herd) were then allocated a twin production status, to indicate the number of twin sets (0, 1 or >1) produced, or produced so far, in their lifetime. There were records from 1559 cows, with sire and dam also known. Twin production status was significantly influenced by dam group (P < 0·01), i.e. the twin production status of the cow's dam. Sires were classified into two groups, according to whether any daughters had produced two or more sets of twins. After allowing for ascertainment, sires in the two groups were found to differ (P < 0·01) by 0·06 in the probability of their daughters producing at least one set of twins in their lifetime (i.e. 0·08 to 0·14). One sire and dam combination in particular had prolific daughters with a probability of 0·39 of producing at least one set of twins in their lifetime (compared with a probability of 0-07 for the other extreme combination). The possibility of these observations being explained by the segregation of a single recessive gene was considered, but the necessary interaction between sire group and dam group was not significant.

Keywords

cattlegenetic factorstwinning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 481 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowman, J. C. and Hendy, C. R. C. 1970. The incidence, repeatability and effect on dam performance of twinning in British Friesian cattle. Animal Production 12: 55–62.Google Scholar
Burfening, P. J., Kress, D. D. and Trowbridge, D. D. 1984. Effect of Simmental breeding on the incidence of twinning in Simmental cows. Journal of Animal Science 59: Suppl. 1, p. 474 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Davis, G. H., Montgomery, G. W., Allison, A. J., Kelly, R. W. and Bray, A. R. 1982. Segregation of a major gene influencing fecundity in progeny ofBooroola sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 25: 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, A. W. 1973. Human twinning in and around the Aland Islands. Commentationes Biologicae 64. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1965. The inheritance of liability tocertain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Annals of Human Genetics 29: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulley, J. L., Gillard, P., Manfredi, E. and San Cristobal, M. 1990. Natural twinning in Maine Anjou and prospects for selection. Proceedings of the International Congress on Maine Anjou Cattle, Calgary, Alberta, 1990 In press.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Echternkamp, S. E., Dickerson, G. E., Cundiff, L. V. and Koch, R. M. 1988. Twinning in cattle. Proceedings of the 6th World Association of Animal Production, Helsinki 1988, p.481 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Johansson, I. 1932. The sex ratio and multiple births in cattle. Zeitschrift fur Züchtung B 24: 183–268.Google Scholar
Maijala, K. and Syväjärvi, J. 1977. On the possibility of developing multiparous cattle by selection. Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 94: 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. A. 1984. A review of the genetics andreproductive physiology of dizygotic twinning in cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 52: 803–819.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A. and Day, A. M. 1986. Ovulation resultsfrom cattle herds with high twinning frequency. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Nebraska, Vol. 11, pp.96–100.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A. and Day, A. M. 1987. Ovulation andcalving data in a twin breeding experiment. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Reproductive Biology 19: 29 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
New Zealand Dairy Board. 1961. Farm Production Division, Annual Report, 1960161, Vol. 37, p. 78.Google Scholar
Piper, L. R. and Bindon, B. M. 1982. Genetic segregation for fecundity in Booroola Merino sheep. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Sheep andBeef Cattle, Palmerston North, New Zealand, Vol. 1, pp. 395–400.Google Scholar
Rankin, B. J. and Okidi, M. D. 1975. Twinning in a closed Hereford herd. Journal of Animal Science 41:256 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ron, M., Ezra, E. and Weller, J. I. 1990. Genetic analysis of twinning rate in Israeli Holstein cattle. Génétique, Sélection, Evolution In press.Google Scholar
Stolzenburg, U. and Schonmuth, G. 1979. Genetische aspekte der zwillingsträchtigkeit beim rind. Academieder Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, (1086 Berlin) 17: (7), 1–49.Google Scholar
Syrstad, O. 1984. Inheritance of multiple births incattle. Livestock Production Science 11: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar