Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:01.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle 1. Food intake and milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Cushnahan  and
C. S. Mayne
A. Cushnahan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 SDR
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 SDR
Get access

Abstract

Twelve lactatiug dairy cows were offered either fresh grass (G) or grass silage prepared from the same pasture which had undergone either an extensive (E) or restricted (R) fermentation, in a three-period change-over design experiment. Ensilage resulted in a reduction in forage pH and water-soluble carbohydrate concentration and an increase in ammonia-nitrogen concentration. The ensiling techniques used ensured that both silages were well preserved with pH values for E and R of 3.81 and 4.08 respectively, while the respective lactic acid concentrations were 124.6 and 27.0 g/kg dry matter respectively. Whilst there were no significant differences in dry-matter intake between treatments, when corrected for losses of volatile compounds, animals offered silage with a restricted fermentation consumed their food at a higher rate of intake (P < 0.001) than did animals on the other treatments. It was also found that while there was no significant difference in milk yield between animals offered fresh or ensiled forage, both butterfat and protein concentration and yields of butterfat were significantly higher (P < 0.01 or greater) with grass and restricted fermented silage than with extensively fermented silage. Ensiling of herbage had no significant effect on apparent digestibility. It is concluded that ensiling of herbage per se had little effect on overall animal performance but pattern of silage fermentation resulted in alterations in milk composition.

Keywords

dairy cmvsfood intakemilk productionsilage making
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Pfeffer, E. and Armstrong, D. G. 1971. The effect of drying and ensiling grass on its digestion in sheep. Sites of energy and carbohydrate digestion. British Journal of Nutrition 26:123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, A. M. and Lancaster, R. J. 1970. The effect of storage time on the voluntary intake of silage by sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 30: 77–89.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. 1982. Feeding high-quality silage. In Silage for milk production (ed. Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C.), technical bulletin, National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading, no. 2, pp. 127–150.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Martin, P. A., Robertson, S. and Hunter, E. A. 1992. Effects of the type of additive and the type of supplement on the utilization of grass silage for milk production in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 47: 391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. and Quig, J. 1987. The effects of rate of addition of formic acid and sulphuric acid on the ensilage of perennial ryegrass in laboratory silos, journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 38: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Robertson, S., Martin, P. A. and Jackson, D. A. 1990. The effects of the addition of a mixture of ammonium salts of methanoic and propanoic acids and octanoic acid at ensiling on the nutritional value of silage for milk production. Proceedings of the ninth silage conference, Newcastlc-upon-Tyne, pp. 120–121.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. 1971. Detergent method for total lignin in herbage. CSIRO Division of Plant Industry (Aust.), Field Station Record 10: 29–34.Google Scholar
Cushnahan, A. and Gordon, F. J. 1995. The effects of grass preservation on intake by sheep, digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60: 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A., Mayne, C. S. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. Effects of ensilage of grass on performance and nutrient utilization by dairy cattle. 2. Nutrient metabolism and rumen fermentation. Animal Science 60: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, O. D. and Haigh, P. M. 1993. A comparison of formic acid and an acid-salt type additive on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation. Grass and Forage Science 48: 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. and Dulphy, J. P. 1977. Effect of ensiling on feed intake and animal performance. Proceedings of the international meeting on animal production from temperate grassland, Dublin, pp. 53–61.Google Scholar
Doherty, J. G. and Mayne, C. S. 1992. The effects of supplementary soluble carbohydrate or lactic acid on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows offered either restricted or extensively fermented silages. Proceedings of the third research conference, British Grassland Society, Greenmount, pp. 151–152.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. 1980. The intake of conserved forages. In Forage conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, D.), occasional symposium, British Grassland Society, no. 11, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Michalet-Doreau, B. and Demarquilly, C. 1984. Etude comparee des quantities ingérées et du comportment alimentaire et merycique dovins et de bovins recevant des ensilages d'hérbe realises selon differentes techniques. Annales de Zootechnie 33: 291n320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, H. F. and Mayne, C. S. 1992. The effects of fermentation characteristics of grass silage on the eating behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Production 54: 464(abstr.).Google Scholar
Farhan, S. M. A. and Thomas, P. C. 1978. The effect of partial neutralisation of formic acid silages with sodium bicarbonate on their voluntary intake by cattle and sheep. journal of the British Grassland Society 33: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockill, P. and Hoyle, B. S. 1986. A method for the automatic monitoring of food intake and feed behaviour of individual cattle kept in groups. Research and Development in Agricultures 3: 175–180.Google Scholar
Gill, M. 1986. Interaction between animal and feed in the control of voluntary intake of conserved forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the 1986 Cornell nutrition conference, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
Harris, C. E. and Raymond, W. F. 1963. The effects of ensiling on crop digestibility, journal of the Britisli Grassland Society 18: 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, T. W. J. and Murphy, J. J. 1993. The effects of ensiling on the intake of herbage and milk production by lactating dairy cows. Animal Production 56: 423–424 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Keady, T. W. J. and Murphy, J. J. 1994. An evaluation of ensiling per se and of the addition of sugar and fishmeal on forage dry matter intake and milk production of lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 77: suppl. 1, p. 113.Google Scholar
Kenney, P. A. and Black, J. L. 1984. Factors affecting diet selection by sheep. 1. Potential intake rate and acceptability of feed. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 35: 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. 1981. Equations for predicting silage intake by beef and dairy cattle. Proceedings of the sixth silage conference, Edinburgh, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. and Edwards, R. A. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayne, C. S. 1992. An evaluation of the concentrate sparing effect of four silage additives. Animal Production 54: 488 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Steen, R. W. J. 1993. A review of animal production responses to formic acid and inoculant treatment of grass silage in trials at the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the tenth silage conference, Dublin, pp. 178–179.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. M. 1979. Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. J. 1992. The performance of dairy cows fed Maxgrass and formic acid-treated silages. Annual Production 54: 488 (abstr.).Google Scholar
O'Kiely, P. 1993. Influence of a partially neutralised blend of aliphatic organic acids on fermentation, effluent production and aerobic stability of autumn grass silage. Irish journal of Agricultural and Food Research 32: 13–26.Google Scholar
O'Kiely, P. and Moloney, A. P. 1994. Silage characteristics and performance of cattle offered grass silage made without an additive, with formic acid or with a partially neutralised blend of aliphatic organic acids. Irish journal of Agricultural and Food Research 33: 25–39.Google Scholar
Parker, J. W. G. 1979. Self-feeding dairy cows. Great House Experimental Husbandry Farm annual review 1979, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Poots, R. E., Carson, M. T. and Kennedy, S. J. 1992. The effect of Maxgrass silage additive and level of concentrate supplementation on silage intake, animal performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef cattle. Animal Production 54: 488–489 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Rae, R. C.Thomas, C.Reeve, A., Golightly, A., Hodson, R. G. and Baker, R. D. 1987. The potential of an all-grass diet for the late-winter calving dairy cow. Grass and Forage Science 42: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. L., Bryant, A. M., Jury, K. E. and Hutton, J. B. 1979. Silage and dairy cow production. 1. Digestible energy intake and yield and composition of milk of cows fed pasture and pasture silages. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, A. J., Dhanoa, M. S. and Gill, M. 1990. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 2. Principle component and ridge regression analyses. Animal Production 50: 439–454.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J. and Gill, M. 1990. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 1. Linear regression analyses. Animal Production 50: 425–438.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L., Gill, M. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1992. Studies of method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle. 1. Voluntary feed intake, digestion and rate of passage. British journal of Nutrition 67: 305–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. III. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. and Harris, C. E. 1971. The voluntary intake of silage by sheep. 1. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. 1987. Silage in western Europe. In evelopments in silage 1987 (ed. Wilkinson, J. M. and Stark, B. A.), pp. 1–5. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow.Google Scholar